Author Topic: If we had the Meteor  (Read 4274 times)

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: If we had the Meteor
« Reply #60 on: January 19, 2009, 05:46:00 PM »
If horde noe toolsheding can be considered combat in this game... shooting down buzz bombs IRL qualifies as combat.

Or a am I on a different page?
See Rule #4

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: If we had the Meteor
« Reply #61 on: January 19, 2009, 05:49:57 PM »
You are reading the cliff's notes.. slacker.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: If we had the Meteor
« Reply #62 on: January 19, 2009, 06:10:03 PM »
You are reading the cliff's notes.. slacker.
Sorry  :cry
See Rule #4

Offline Banshee7

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6593
Re: If we had the Meteor
« Reply #63 on: January 19, 2009, 06:15:19 PM »
don't cry...we all make mistakes...you just make more  :D
Tours 86 - 296

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: If we had the Meteor
« Reply #64 on: January 20, 2009, 04:14:55 AM »
So, did the H-162 shoot down some?
AFAIK the Meteor made many more sorties though. And 10 months of combat service is IMHO enough to put it on the list of AH.
AND the V-1  :t
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: If we had the Meteor
« Reply #65 on: January 26, 2009, 01:50:00 PM »
Wasn't aware they could shoot back.  I'll get back to reading now.

Mossie B MkXVI?
71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: If we had the Meteor
« Reply #66 on: January 26, 2009, 02:07:51 PM »
This argument of "it did vs it did not" could be solved if HTC would just step in and say their position on the matter...


...


...


but dont count on it.   ;) 
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: If we had the Meteor
« Reply #67 on: January 29, 2009, 03:02:14 AM »
Maybe they're looking for us to settle it?
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Hap

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3908
Re: If we had the Meteor
« Reply #68 on: January 29, 2009, 02:53:42 PM »
Having more planes cannot help but allow for more fun.  Don't have to feed them, pay for them, or wash them.

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: If we had the Meteor
« Reply #69 on: February 02, 2009, 03:54:20 PM »
So YESSSS to the Meteor ;)
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)