« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9 10   Go Down

Author Topic: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII  (Read 18972 times)

Offline Redlegs

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1151
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #105 on: September 17, 2008, 05:59:46 PM »
Quote from: Schlowy on September 16, 2008, 10:56:53 PM
Japan couldn't invade the tiniest island of the Alaskan chain up there.

Please, tell me this was a joke.  :uhoh
Logged
Resident Arizona Cardinals/Cincinnati Reds fan

Offline Captain Virgil Hilts

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6128
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #106 on: September 17, 2008, 06:06:13 PM »
Quote from: Schlowy on September 16, 2008, 10:56:53 PM
Japan couldn't invade the tiniest island of the Alaskan chain up there.

Congratulations on upping the ante for stupidity in this thread. In fact, you've cornered the market. The Aleutian Island chain WAS invaded, and some were held for quite some time.
Logged
"I haven't seen Berlin yet, from the ground or the air, and I plan on doing both, BEFORE the war is over."

SaVaGe

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18211
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #107 on: September 17, 2008, 08:20:06 PM »
Lets settle this once and for all, Somebody give this dork a few sheets of plywood, and a jig saw. Let him build a simple 12 "foot" (need to be sure he understand the units), jig. Nothing too complicated. We'll give him an hour to finish just the jig, not a whole plane.


I get to drop the one bomb on his house while he works. Lets see if he can finish just the jig   :D
Logged

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #108 on: September 17, 2008, 08:48:22 PM »
What is an inch foot inch? :devil You could have wrote "'". :D

An example of a plywood assembly jig. :rolleyes:
Logged

Offline Rollins

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1041
      • 4thFG
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #109 on: September 17, 2008, 10:18:52 PM »
Ahh, well that's looks doable.  An hour, huh?  OK, Showy get to it, Ack-Ack keeps time and Virgil throws the bomb.  He really does deserve it after all this.
Logged
http://www.flamewarriors.net    Here kitty kitty...

Offline SIK1

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3758
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #110 on: September 17, 2008, 10:22:30 PM »
Quote from: MiloMorai on September 17, 2008, 08:48:22 PM
What is an inch foot inch? :devil You could have wrote "'". :D

An example of a plywood assembly jig. :rolleyes:
(Image removed from quote.)

I could build that jig in an hour.

What I want to know is this. The one bomb used to take out the plywood jig, is it 250lbs, 500lbs, or a 1,000lbs? That makes a huge difference you know.
Logged
444th Air Mafia since Air Warrior
Proudly flying with VF-17 The Jolly Rogers

"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG54

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #111 on: September 18, 2008, 05:05:28 AM »
« Last Edit: September 18, 2008, 05:11:04 AM by Charge »
Logged
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #112 on: September 18, 2008, 05:48:57 AM »
Sometimes factory bombing worked,sometimes it didn't....
Logged
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #113 on: September 18, 2008, 05:57:35 AM »
Logged
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #114 on: September 18, 2008, 06:03:19 AM »
Logged
See Rule #4

Offline Schlowy

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #115 on: September 18, 2008, 01:13:06 PM »
Yes japan did take one of those tiny little snowy islands DUH. Had nuthing on it at all, right? Was it even defended? Let me guess, 'big bad japan' killed a single eskimo familly? Nobody cared that they were even there. They couldn't even do anything from there. They didn't take pearl harbor, and they didn't take alaska either, not even two of the small islands? LOL

If you think that was an invasion, I know for a fact that the Nazi's invaded a small school in Milwauki, Wisconsin. Well, atleast 2 5th graders made a flag out of a white sheet and some red paint and some black paint, and ran it up the school's flagpole in the middle of the night, GOOD MORNING!  :uhoh
OMG THE NAZIS TOOK OVER THE WHOLE USA <--- what you fewls sound like, PATHETIC!

1 bomb would not do anything to america, period.
On the other hand, 1 (nuke) american bomb killed a whole city of theirs, twice!

SMARTY PANTS FEWLS... tell us the name of the airbase and where it was located, that kept a large percentage of Japans Airforce on Defense, for most of the war, in FEAR of their own invasion? :huh

Oh and those baloons they launced, documentary I saw said it killed a mother and 2 kids was it? At that, it didn't even explode till after the kid messed with... briliant those japans were? LOL
« Last Edit: September 18, 2008, 01:21:43 PM by Schlowy »
Logged
if the BoB is proof the spitty was better, then the Battle of Dieppe is proof the 109 was better.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dieppe_Raid
Shane said in game 'oh the nazi kid' referring to me...
Lynx got in it saying 'yawn' and then calling me 'tw@' again...
I got chat

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #116 on: September 18, 2008, 01:19:44 PM »
This is a perfect example of why the BBS needs a squelch function. We should call it the 'anti-troll' button.
Logged
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Schlowy

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 105
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #117 on: September 18, 2008, 01:23:11 PM »
I repeat:

SMARTY PANTS FEWLS... tell us the name of the airbase and where it was located, that kept a large percentage of Japans Airforce on Defense, for most of the war, in FEAR of their own invasion?

C'mon, yeah the squelching begin.
Logged
if the BoB is proof the spitty was better, then the Battle of Dieppe is proof the 109 was better.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dieppe_Raid
Shane said in game 'oh the nazi kid' referring to me...
Lynx got in it saying 'yawn' and then calling me 'tw@' again...
I got chat

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #118 on: September 18, 2008, 01:25:40 PM »
Schlowy... you finish that jig yet. :lol
Logged
See Rule #4

Offline RATTFINK

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3488
Re: Hiding the Lockheed plant during WWII
« Reply #119 on: September 18, 2008, 01:31:24 PM »
WOW... how we have strayed from the cool topic I started with...  LOL!!
Logged
Hitting trees since tour 78
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 [8] 9 10   Go Up
« previous next »