Author Topic: A-26 Invader  (Read 10781 times)

Offline 442w30

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 471
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #75 on: September 28, 2008, 10:54:45 AM »
As compared to what? 48,000 lb 3somes of LancStukas already dropping on tanks battles and CVs  like use once and throw away pampers daipers?

Or my all time favorite. The fire and forget JU-torpedo express. Why would anyone risk perk points when the same stupidity can be accomplished with free airplanes?

I am not seeing that anymore- the LancStukas anyway. First time I had seen it in months was last week and all three Lancs were shot down by a Wirbel before they could drop there bombs.  A smaller, much faster (than the Lancs) A26 would be even more deadly to GVs than the plane that scares me the most when I am in a tank, the A20.  It is after all a better A20.  You second post pretty much helps make this argument.

<S> bombrich
Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time

"The plural of anecdote is no data."- statistician's axiom

Offline TwinEng

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 286
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #76 on: September 28, 2008, 08:16:13 PM »
Why don't you stop fighting this war and let some axis planes be added.


Why don't you stop being so very rude, and saying untrue things about other people???

.

Offline macerxgp

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 333
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #77 on: September 28, 2008, 08:19:46 PM »

Why don't you stop being so very rude, and saying untrue things about other people???

.

 :lol

Seriously though, needs more axis bombers.
Quote from: Saurdaukar
Operational kettles in August 2009 exceed operational pots by approximately 142%.

Your comparison is invalid.

DeMaskus
357th-Death Dragons

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #78 on: September 28, 2008, 08:53:44 PM »

Why don't you stop being so very rude, and saying untrue things about other people???

.
:huh :huh :huh?
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline 1pLUs44

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3332
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #79 on: September 28, 2008, 09:09:56 PM »
Why don't you stop fighting this war and let some axis planes be added.

Because the He-111 and the A-26 will be added in it's own time. No offense, but the He-111 sucks. As soon as we do get it, you'll just call it a POS. (remember the P-39?)
No one knows what the future may bring.

Offline SuBWaYCH

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #80 on: September 28, 2008, 09:14:41 PM »
glock, get some fresh air. You must have close to 100 posts on this week alone, and just about all of them being in this forum.

On topic, I think we could deff. see this, but in the not-so-near future.
Axis C.O. for Battle of the Dnieper, Winter '43

Air superiority is a condition for all operations, at sea, on land, and in the air. - Air Marshal Arthur Tedder

364th Chawks

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #81 on: September 28, 2008, 09:31:20 PM »
glock, get some fresh air. You must have close to 100 posts on this week alone, and just about all of them being in this forum.

On topic, I think we could deff. see this, but in the not-so-near future.
Just saying there really no need for the A-26 2 be added now. Later on when we get some new GVs. :devil
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline SuBWaYCH

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1730
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #82 on: September 28, 2008, 09:47:41 PM »
Just saying there really no need for the A-26 2 be added now. Later on when we get some new GVs. :devil

Didn't you say earlier in this thread you wanted axis bombers?
Axis C.O. for Battle of the Dnieper, Winter '43

Air superiority is a condition for all operations, at sea, on land, and in the air. - Air Marshal Arthur Tedder

364th Chawks

Offline BaDkaRmA158Th

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2542
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #83 on: September 29, 2008, 05:25:37 AM »
I fly the 39 all the time.
Do not blame me wanting it for years on the fact you are unable or unwilling to fly it in combat.

 :rock

---Subject---

Anything with wings engines and a few guns =  :aok

So quit pushin' your planes agenda in someone elses WISH post.


Last time i checked it was called a wishlist, not a debate list.
~383Rd RTC/CH BW/AG~
BaDfaRmA

My signature says "Our commitment to diplomacy will never inhibit our willingness to kick a$s."

Offline vonKrimm

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 949
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #84 on: September 29, 2008, 08:17:57 AM »
If we get the King Tiger (or the IS-whatever), then we should automatically get the A-26. :devil
The reciprocal is not true.


Fight Like a Girl

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #85 on: September 29, 2008, 01:53:43 PM »
Didn't you say earlier in this thread you wanted axis bombers?
Yes we need axis bombers to be added no USA fighters or bombers need to be added.
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline stroker71

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 939
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #86 on: September 29, 2008, 05:50:38 PM »
Yes we need axis bombers to be added no USA fighters or bombers need to be added.

Well like it or not the A-26 was third in the voting.  I know what you can do...boycott the BBS till they do what you say!!!!  Yes they do call me the idea guy!
Back to DuHasst
Here since tour 84
Quote by Uptown "It's one thing to play the game...quite another to live there."

Offline Rich46yo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #87 on: September 29, 2008, 06:14:58 PM »
I fly the 39 all the time.
Do not blame me wanting it for years on the fact you are unable or unwilling to fly it in combat.

 :rock

---Subject---

Anything with wings engines and a few guns =  :aok

So quit pushin' your planes agenda in someone elses WISH post.


Last time i checked it was called a wishlist, not a debate list.

The P-39 is a nice airplane. The problem is getting guys in it. Once you get in it, have a few runs in them, then you are left with a favorible impression of it.
"flying the aircraft of the Red Star"

Offline glock89

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #88 on: September 29, 2008, 06:46:19 PM »
Well like it or not the A-26 was third in the voting.  I know what you can do...boycott the BBS till they do what you say!!!!  Yes they do call me the idea guy!
:aok
Fear and death in the wings, in thrall of those fallen from grace
Petty is as petty does, witness the mass disgrace.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #89 on: September 29, 2008, 08:26:21 PM »
but the He-111 sucks.

Ignorance is bliss and you've got a mightly blissful look on your face.  Please explain to all of us how in your 'experten' opinion that the He-111 sucks.  We're waiting...


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song