There were not "many, many" Bf109G-6s produced in 1943 with the 30mm cannon. "Many, many" would imply close to 50%, if not the majority of those produced.
If you want to be convincing, post actual production numbers of both 20mm and 30mm armed Bf109G-6s, broken down by at least to quarterly numbers, preferably monthly. Don't use completely subjective language like "many, many".
Don't worry about Karnak, Anaxogoras. He couldn't have done it in the case of IL-2's NS-37 cannons either when they weren't in the game, they are here now as you can see. When it comes to this issue he seems to be one big double standard at work...
From another thread:
Many of us asked for the NS-37 gun package on the IL-2. I think I first requested it when the IL-2 was originally added without them.
He keeps saying how the MK-108 in G-6 will get abused in events and yet he himself asks a rare gun package to another aircraft which most definately would get abused in scenarios like Niemen, Kurland, Stalins Fourth and so on. Oh wait, no it wouldn't...these kind of load out restrictions (like no bombs should be carried) will be and have been dealt with gentlemans agreements before. Many times Snapshot-event's rules state that 100% fuel should be carried also. Of course the best way would be to have a tool for the CM's so that they could define only the allowed load outs available as an arena setting for events.
G-6 is the 109 for events from 2/43 until spring/summer of '44 no matter what canopy it carries or from what serial number-block the external features of the AH's 3D-model come from. It also has to engage '44 US heavy bombers in the midwar-arena.
So as long as there are load out options like NS-37 for Il-2 and 3xB-20 for La-7 in AH, 109G-6 should have its 30mm cannon just for sake of consistency alone.