« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Bomber Perk Choices  (Read 1453 times)

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2009, 01:46:33 PM »
Quote from: Lusche on January 26, 2009, 01:00:37 PM
So what? The Tallboy/Grand Slam requests followed the Lancaster too, same as the requests about making B-25's available from CVs ...  ;)

I'll just be satisfied to get the B-25s rockets and external bomb pylons....
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline stroker71

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 939
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #16 on: January 26, 2009, 02:04:36 PM »
So how about it costing bomber perks everytime to strap on anything bigger than 250# bomb to a fighter.  It was very very rare that fighters carried such heavy bombs anyway.  Forget the B-29! for now anyway.
Logged
Back to DuHasst
Here since tour 84
Quote by Uptown "It's one thing to play the game...quite another to live there."

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2009, 05:07:39 PM »
Quote from: stroker71 on January 26, 2009, 02:04:36 PM
So how about it costing bomber perks everytime to strap on anything bigger than 250# bomb to a fighter.  It was very very rare that fighters carried such heavy bombs anyway.  Forget the B-29! for now anyway.
500s were not uncommon.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #18 on: January 26, 2009, 05:37:22 PM »
It would also have to depend on the type of aircraft and the arena, as well. By the end of the war 1000lbers were NOT uncommon for some American fighters.

Now, Tiny Tims, OTOH....

 :noid
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15723
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #19 on: January 26, 2009, 08:21:16 PM »
Quote from: Saxman on January 26, 2009, 01:46:33 PM
I'll just be satisfied to get the B-25s rockets and external bomb pylons....
+1.
Logged
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline FYB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #20 on: January 27, 2009, 07:14:03 PM »
Quote from: Lusche on January 26, 2009, 01:00:37 PM
So what? The Tallboy/Grand Slam requests followed the Lancaster too, same as the requests about making B-25's available from CVs ...  ;)
There should be a version of a B-25 for the CV, i mean it was used to give japan breakfast then the B-17's and 24's were lunch and B-29 = nuke, made dinner.

I should make a thread or not, maybe.

-FYB
« Last Edit: January 27, 2009, 07:42:09 PM by FYB »
Logged
Most skill based sport? -
Quote from: Skuzzy on July 11, 2012, 04:31:22 PM
The sport of understanding women.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #21 on: January 27, 2009, 07:37:05 PM »
Quote from: FYB on January 27, 2009, 07:14:03 PM
There should be a version of a light weight B-25 for the CV, i mean it was used to give japan the breakfast then the B-17's and 24's were lunch and B-29 = nuke, made dinner.

I should make a thread or not, maybe.

-FYB

You comment makes no sense to anybody remotely familiar with WWII history.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline FYB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #22 on: January 27, 2009, 07:41:20 PM »
Quote from: Karnak on January 27, 2009, 07:37:05 PM
You comment makes no sense to anybody remotely familiar with WWII history.
The Doolittle raid??? Does it sound familiar?

-FYB
Logged
Most skill based sport? -
Quote from: Skuzzy on July 11, 2012, 04:31:22 PM
The sport of understanding women.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #23 on: January 27, 2009, 07:59:06 PM »
Yes. It sounds like ONE sortie out of the thousands flown.

Save it for Special Events.
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #24 on: January 27, 2009, 08:35:17 PM »
Quote from: FYB on January 27, 2009, 07:41:20 PM
The Doolittle raid??? Does it sound familiar?

-FYB
I know quite a bit about the Doolittle raid.  You seem to think it was significant enough to warrant something it does not.  It was pure propaganda, very effective propaganda, but it had no effect on the Japanese capabilities.

B-17s and B-24s did not have much effect on the war in the pacific either.  The B-29 did have a large effect of course.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline FYB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1074
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #25 on: January 27, 2009, 08:56:27 PM »
Quote from: Saxman on January 27, 2009, 07:59:06 PM
Yes. It sounds like ONE sortie out of the thousands flown.

Save it for Special Events.
yeah, yeah... you too karnak, yeah, yeah...

-FYB

Logged
Most skill based sport? -
Quote from: Skuzzy on July 11, 2012, 04:31:22 PM
The sport of understanding women.

Offline SmokinLoon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6168
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #26 on: January 28, 2009, 12:48:10 AM »
I've been saying for quite some time that a there are 4 buffs that should be perks now as it is simply due to their destructive power, their ability to defend themselves, and the range they possess.

Lancs, B24, B17, and B26.  If the Ar234 is perked for its speed... then why not the raw destructive power for those I just metioned?

If the Ar234 is perked at 60 for a "norm", the try the Lancs at 12, the B24's at 9, B17's at 7, the B26's at 5. 

Stop and think of how many bomber perk points we have built up.  Stop and think what we spend them on.  Stop and think how easy they are to earn... still think perking the bombers is a bad idea???  Why? 
Logged
Proud grandson of the late Lt. Col. Darrell M. "Bud" Gray, USAF (ret.), B24D pilot, 5th BG/72nd BS. 28 combat missions within the "slot", PTO.

Offline phatzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3734
      • No Crying
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #27 on: January 28, 2009, 07:48:03 AM »
Logged
No thank you Turkish, I'm sweet enough.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #28 on: January 28, 2009, 10:29:07 AM »
Because the Lanc, B-17 and B-24 are not survivable and were in no way rare in the real deal.

The idea of perking those three is absurd.
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Anaxogoras

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7072
Re: Bomber Perk Choices
« Reply #29 on: January 28, 2009, 10:47:34 AM »
Bomber drones don't belong in the game simply because of how much they warp, how much they're abused (flight of Lancs carpet-bombing gv battles), and their violation of the 1 player 1 aircraft/vehicle principle.

If that weren't bad enough, bomber drones can't follow their leader through a sharp turn (they'll explode), but they can follow their leader through an Immelmann.
Logged
gavagai
334th FS

RPS for Aces High!
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »