Die Hard,
I usually don't get involved in these types of arguments, because for the most part, it's a matter of opinion not fact. You initiated this discussion, and asked for others opinions in a very odd way. You stated that you only wanted to hear from people who had the same thoughts, without allowing for any discussion.
Anyone else have the same thoughts on this subject?
From that point on, you should have just ignored any opinion that you disagreed with. It was clear to me that you had no intention of changing your opinion or looking for a discussion. So while many of the responses provided valid points of disagreement with you opinion, you continue to engage them as if they are wrong and you are right. So to make this very clear, to this point in the discussion,
no one has completely agreed with your opinion. Some have agreed that any additional planes are good. A few, myself included, have agreed that the early versions of the Mustang are not represented properly.
Almost every other response is directed at the position that many other aircraft are need,
BEFORE any further late war Mustang's would need to be added. I concur with that opinion, and suspect that you would have an extremely difficult time trying to convince any of us, otherwise.
You have done nothing to support your original position, and instead have chosen to react to the comments you should be ignoring. Perhaps if you posted some documentation to support your original position you'd do more to help this discussion. Because your current approach to responding, is only going make this worse.
Just a thought,
<S> Baumer
