Author Topic: Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38  (Read 7323 times)

Offline Seeker

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #30 on: March 04, 2001, 09:47:00 AM »
While you guys are discussing former flying vets, you might like to pop in here and say hi to them your self:
 http://www.worldwar2pilots.com/

And if StSanta's reading this, go here Santa, ya wannabee :-)
 http://www.worldwar2pilots.com/LW-Bernard.htm

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #31 on: March 04, 2001, 11:29:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by LJK Raubvogel:
We've been through this Galland and Lowell thing before. All evidence points to it not being Galland in the cockpit, and it was certainly not a 190D-9.

Except that Lowell and Galland agreed that they were the participants.....

Based upon that evidence, the case is a slam-dunk. How do can argue with eyewitness testimony? Granted, deliveries of the 190D did not begin until August of '44. So what?
Don't you think that Galland could have one at his disposal with little more than a telephone call? It seems to me that the 190D would have been extensively evaluated in combat PRIOR to delivery to the various fighter units. Is it implausible that Galland would want to evaluate the aircraft before it was issued?

It seems to me that those who are unhappy with the story will try to rationalize that it could not be, because it is disturbing to their preconceived vision of reality. It's the old Luftwaffe apologist mafia mindset at work. Just like the Robert E. Lee cult, the Luftwaffe cult cannot admit that they were defeated by superior equipment, tactics and training. Using the exact reasoning of the Confederate Lost Cause die hards, "we were overwhelmed by numbers" rings out as their unending mantra.

One indisputable fact should be remembered when we hear the endless whine that the P-38 was no match for the obsolecent Bf 109 and marginal Fw 190A; after seperating operational losses from the equation, the P-38 holds nearly a 4 to 1 positive kill ratio over the Luftwaffe. That gentlemen, is the final arbiter in this debate. Flying hundreds of miles from home, low on fuel and usually out-numbered, the P-38 gave a hell of a lot better than it received to the mighty Luftwaffe. No amount of pissing and crying can change the cold, hard reality of these facts. Which, by the way were confirmed not only by gun camera film, by eyewitnesses, but by several years of postwar research by the AAF.

Another thing that is always cast aside by the Luftwaffe mafia is the P-38's drubbing of the Japanese. "Doesn't count" say's the mafia, "the Japanese were much easier foes than the illustrious Luftwaffe."

Really? Then explain this: Pilots who fought against the Japanese with little or no success, and later transferred to the ETO (George Preddy and John Landers being two examples), generally performed very well. However, successful pilots transferring from the ETO to the SWPA, CBI and Central Pacific generally performed poorly against the Japanese. Why does this appear to be the case? Let's hear your arguments.

My regards,

Widewing

My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Nath-BDP

  • Guest
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #32 on: March 04, 2001, 03:41:00 PM »
 
Quote
It seems to me that those who are unhappy with the story will try to rationalize that it could not be, because it is disturbing to their preconceived vision of reality. It's the old Luftwaffe apologist mafia mindset at work. Just like the Robert E. Lee cult, the Luftwaffe cult cannot admit that they were defeated by superior equipment, tactics and training. Using the exact reasoning of the Confederate Lost Cause die hards, "we were overwhelmed by numbers" rings out as their unending mantra.

   

Pretty good for being outnumbered 5-20:1 on the Western front eh?

Face it, the only reason the Allies did so well in the air was because they had lots of numbers and lots of resouces which they could fall back on, eg pilots, fuel, etc.

According to "Focke-Wulf Fw 190 combat" by Alfred Price the Luftwaffe had 84 190s operational on the Western front on 31 May 1944 and 187 on 17 May 1943. The Allies operated 4-10x that many and sent raids with 1000 bombers and 1200 escorts by 1944, and yet Luftwaffe still destroyed an amazing amount of aircraft, IN INFERIOR AIRCRAFT!

 
Quote
One indisputable fact should be remembered when we hear the endless whine that the P-38 was no match for the obsolecent Bf 109 and marginal Fw 190A; after seperating operational losses from the equation, the P-38 holds nearly a 4 to 1 positive kill ratio over the Luftwaffe. That gentlemen, is the final arbiter in this debate. Flying hundreds of miles from home, low on fuel and usually out-numbered, the P-38 gave a hell of a lot better than it received to the mighty Luftwaffe. No amount of pissing and crying can change the cold, hard reality of these facts. Which, by the way were confirmed not only by gun camera film, by eyewitnesses, but by several years of postwar research by the AAF.

I assume that k/d was in 1943? Well look at the chart my friend... LW owned 1943. Also when looking at these numbers you must remember that the LW were ordered to engage bombers and ignore the fighter escort, so those P38 kills and basically hollow victories.


 
Quote
Another thing that is always cast aside by the Luftwaffe mafia is the P-38's drubbing of the Japanese. "Doesn't count" say's the mafia, "the Japanese were much easier foes than the illustrious Luftwaffe."
 
Quote
Really? Then explain this: Pilots who fought against the Japanese with little or no success, and later transferred to the ETO (George Preddy and John Landers being two examples), generally performed very well. However, successful pilots transferring from the ETO to the SWPA, CBI and Central Pacific generally performed poorly against the Japanese. Why does this appear to be the case? Let's hear your arguments.

Heh, preddy was only in combat in the pacific for 2 months and got 2 assists iirc, August to early October 1942 in which he was most likely flying F4Fs. As for Landers, he was an ace in the Pac, thats not successfull enough for you?

Hehe I really love that story of Hartmann taking on 8 P51s for 20 minutes with them not being able to get a shot at him--then he finally got position on one and was out of ammo and fuel, so he was forced to bail.

Widewing, you are so American-biased, and your webpage makes it much more obvious.

[This message has been edited by Nath-BDP (edited 03-04-2001).]

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #33 on: March 04, 2001, 04:50:00 PM »
Look at the Battle of Britain, it is only because the Luftwaffe was so heavily outnumbered that they lost.

Nath-BDP

  • Guest
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #34 on: March 04, 2001, 04:58:00 PM »
No, they lost BoB because of bad leadership higher up.

Offline F4UDOA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1731
      • http://mywebpages.comcast.net/markw4/index.html
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #35 on: March 04, 2001, 07:23:00 PM »
Err,

In the battle of Britain the majority (large majority) of British planes were Hurricanes. And I believe the Brits were the ones out numbered. Also the Brits didn't have combat trained pilots. The Germans had every possible advantage on there side except range and the fact that they were fighting over NME territory. And the Germans still could not win.

Remember this was before operation Barbarosa (the invasion of Russia) so the Germans had every resource devoted to squashing the RAF. Tactics or no tactics, the Luftwaffe had an enormous opportunity to Vulch Britian and couldn't get the job done.

Also Nath,

How many of the German victories in your chart were unescorted bombers? And how many are actual kills versus over claiming? Remember in 1940 the British probably didn't have 1,500 airplanes to shoot down. They were building them and flying them straight into combat.

F4UDOA

[This message has been edited by F4UDOA (edited 03-04-2001).]

Nath-BDP

  • Guest
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #36 on: March 04, 2001, 07:33:00 PM »
 
Quote
How many of the German victories in your chart were unescorted bombers? And how many are actual kills versus over claiming? Remember in 1940 the British probably didn't have 1,500 airplanes to shoot down. They were building them and flying them straight into combat.

Note that that table doesn't include the German night fighter kills, which is around 5,000.

4,234 B17s were lost...

As for your last comment, 1939-40 includes not just British, yet French, Polish, Belgian...

------------------
Nath_____
9./JG 54 "Grünherz"
 

A captured Bolshevik pilot once stated, "In battle, the fighters with the green hearts are generally in the minority. But when they're there, things realy heat up. They're all aces!"

[This message has been edited by Nath-BDP (edited 03-04-2001).]

Nath-BDP

  • Guest
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #37 on: March 04, 2001, 07:50:00 PM »
Here is the caption under this table.,

"Comment:
The most commonly quoted source on this matter is Ernst Obermaier's Die Ritterkreuztriiger der Luftwaffe, Band 1 Jagdflieger 1939-1945. According to Obermaier, the German fighter pilots claimed a total of 70,000 aerial victories during World War 11- 25,000 against the "West" and 45,000 on the Eastern Front. At the same time, the German Flak (AAA
batteries) reported the shooting down of more than 20,000 enemy aircraft.
According to the same source, 16,400 German day fighter aircraft were lost (total
loss, i.e. aircraft with more than 60% damage) as the result of hostile action during the war years. 8,500 German day fighter pilots were killed, 2, 700 went missing or were taken prisoners and 9, lOO were injured.

Different total loss figures for the RAF and USAAF are published frequently. Less
known are the loss statistics for the Soviet Air Force. The so far most reliable figures are given in the book Red Stars, recently published in Finland. According to this, the combat losses of the Soviet Air Force in the Second World War amounted to 46, lOO aircraft. Over 18,400 Soviet officer pilots were killed in action and another 20,600 went missing in
action or were taken prisoners.
Previously, the German author HeinzAF Schmidt (in Sowjetische Flugzeuge) put the
total number of individual combat missions undertaken by the Soviet Air Force between
June 22, 1941 and YE Day 1945 at 3,223,000, thus giving the total loss rate 1.4% for the
whole war, compared with the loss figures given in Red Stars. (As a comparison, the total loss rate for the RAP Bomber Command between July 1940 and YE Day 1945, was 2.9% )
Not included in the table above are the results of the German night fighters, who
claimed to have downed a total of 5,729 Western Allied aircraft, the true figure probably being around 5,000.

This leads to the conclusion that on average, eight Western Allied aircraft were shot down for every ten aerial victories claimed by German day fighter pilots, while the ratio on the Eastern Front was probably a bit smaller, due to the fact that the major part of the air combats in this war theater took part over Soviet held territory."

From the book "Luftwaffe Fighter Aircraft In Profile" isbn 0-7643-0291-4


Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #38 on: March 04, 2001, 11:31:00 PM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Nath-BDP:
 Heh, preddy was only in combat in the pacific for 2 months and got 2 assists iirc, August to early October 1942 in which he was most likely flying F4Fs. As for Landers, he was an ace in the Pac, thats not successfull enough for you?

To be flying F4Fs, Preddy would have had to be in the Navy or Marine Corps. Since he was in the AAF, we can discount Wildcats. Preddy was assigned to the 49th Fighter Group. You remember the 49th, they shot down 668 enemy aircraft, the third highest total for any Fighter Group in any theater. Preddy scored exactly zero while he was with the the 9th Fighter Squadron. He was seriously injured when he dove into John Sauber's P-40, killing Sauber. Preddy was with the squadron for 5 months prior to his accident.

John Landers scored 6 kills (two of which are disputed to this day) while with the 49th FG. Coming to the ETO he claimed another 8.5 and 20 claimed destroyed on the ground, which do not count towards his total.  

 
Quote

Widewing, you are so American-biased, and your webpage makes it much more obvious.

If that means that I don't have any material about the Nazi Luftwaffe, you're right. I have not, nor ever intend to include articles that glorify Luftwaffe. Why? Because there is more than enough on the web already. As I said, there is an entire cult dedicated to apologizing for the failure of the Luftwaffe and the Nazi leadership to defend Germany from the Allied horde. Indeed, the apologia runs deep, with countless books in print, and more being added every year. I see no useful reason to jump on that bandwagon.

What we write about are the aircraft and pilots. We have published historical pieces on the Soviets and Italians, both of which get scant coverage, especially the Italians.

More importantly, we talk to the men who flew the aircraft. In this respect, we work hard to debunk much of the misinformation that already crowds the internet. We don't rely on some author's research, we do our own, and make every effort to talk to the men who were there.

Now, as to your whining about being out-numbered. You ignore the fact that there were just two fighter groups which flew all of the missions into Germany between October 1943 and the end of the year. These units flew the P-38H and J, and every mission found them, frequently with less than 40 total fighters, engaging as many as 300 German fighters. It was not the Luftwaffe who was out-numbered in those days. Moreover, the Luftwaffe did not ignore the P-38s. On the contrary, they did everything possible to disrupt their formations. Arthur Heiden has said that he cannot recall a single mission in where his squadron was not bounced by German fighters. That is until Doolittle authorized Kepner to go after the Luftwaffe, rather than defend the bombers. It was at this point that the Luftwaffe's fate was sealed.

The whole argument about the Luftwaffe being overwhelmed by sheer numbers is a red herring. The Luftwaffe was overwhelmed by technology, traing and tactics. This technology created fighter aircraft with the range to cover every airfield in Germany, from bases 500 miles away. This technology produced a whole host of fighter aircraft that were equal or superior to what Germany was able to field. This technology produced the bombers that pounded German industry and cities into ruin.

Training provided the Allies with pilots who entered combat with the skills required to defeat their German counterparts. The tactics employed pinned the Luftwaffe inside Germany, and then pinned them to their airfields.

Where was German technology? Wasted on weapons that were useless within the scope of the war. Why is it that Germany could not train enough pilots? Why is it that the obsolecent Bf 109 continued in production long after it had reached the limits of development? We could go on ad nauseum.

As I said before, the three Ts were the key to defeating Germany in the west. Technology, Training and Tactics.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #39 on: March 05, 2001, 12:56:00 AM »
Not to mention that LW had to deal with morphine-filled Goering (who was a very ineffective leader) and then Hitler's squeaking for a blitz bomber that killed the 262 from coming into service to make a difference.

I shudder to think what wouldve happened if Rommel had been in command of the Wehrmacht (spelled right?), Galland of the LW and Doenitz given full command of the kriegsmarine from the start.

Widewing.. you have any description of the Clover Leaf manouver in the P-38? Im dying to try it  

Offline Dune

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1727
      • http://www.352ndfightergroup.com/
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #40 on: March 05, 2001, 01:19:00 AM »
Preddy flew a P-40E with the 7th FS/49th FG.  The 49th reached their station at Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia on 18 Mar 42.  There they were tasked with intercepting Japanese bombers otw to Darwin.

Which was not an easy task in -40E's.  "I can recall sitting at 27,000 feet indicating 90 miles per hour and walking the stick all over the cockpit to keep from stalling out while an entire Japanese formation blithely sailed over Darwin three to five thousand feet above us.", from Lt. Lawrence Smith.

Preddy's collision occured on 12 July 42.  Also, from 18 Mar 42 to mid-May 42, the 49th only scored 38 kills (losing 7 planes and three pilots).  During this time he claimed two planes damaged (a Zeke and a Betty), although he lost a kill during his first engagement when he forgot to arm his guns.

BTW, Preddy's flight leader was Joe Kruzel.  Kruzel later became the XO of the 361st FG.  In the PTO he scored 3 kills and got another 3.5 while in the ETO.

- This info from "George Preddy, Top Mustang Ace" by Joe Noah and Sam Sox.

------------------
Col Dune
C.O. 352nd Fighter Group
"The Blue Nosed Bastards of Bodney"

"Credo quia absurdum est." (I believe it because it is unreasonable)
- The motto of the Republic of Baja Arizona

Offline flakbait

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 867
      • http://www.worldaccessnet.com/~delta6
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #41 on: March 05, 2001, 05:19:00 AM »
Hitler's squeaking about a Blitz bomber? That delayed the program for about a month maybe less. Bigger problems were lack of stability at high speeds, fragile nose gear, and engines that didn't like having their throttle changed. Pull a high-speed banking turn and the engines conked out. The 262 was a bigger threat to itself than Hitler ever was. One month after he declaired he wanted the 262 as a Blitz bomber he said 262 fighter production could continue. Somewhere between three weeks and a month after that, he said the idea of a 262 as a Blitz bomber was futile. That's when the Ar234 production effort was scrambled into high gear.

This didn't stop people from trying out new variants of a bomb-carrying 262. All in all what stopped the 262 was the USAAF, and they stopped it on the ground. US fighter-bombers blew up everything that moved, since 262's were moved by train they lost more on the ground than in the air. To quote a book on the 262:

 
Quote
By the end of the first week of April the Luftwaffe had accepted more than 1,200 Me 262s but fewer than 200 were assigned to operational units as follows:

Stab/JG 7
5 Fighters

1. Gruppe JG 7
41 Fighters

III. Gruppe JG 7
30 Fighters

JV-44
50 Fighters

1. Gruppe KG(J) 54
37 Fighters

1. Gruppe KG 51
6 Fighter Bombers

II. Gruppe KG 51
15 Fighter-bombers

10. Gruppe NJG 11
9 Fighters

NAGr 6
7 Recon

The Figure of 200 operational Me 262s would never be exceeded by the Luftwaffe. Of the thousand others that had been built, over half had been destroyed by the Allies, many without having flown an operational sortie. Another hundred served with units either training to enter combat, or withdrawn from combat for rest. The remainder sat unused on railway sidings or airfields.

The 55 sorties conducted by Me 262s on 10 April 1945 would mark the greatest number of missions flown in a single day. 10 American bombers were downed at the cost of 27 jets.

-----------------------
Flakbait [Delta6]
Delta 6's Flight School
Put the P-61B in Aces High
"For yay did the sky darken, and split open and spew forth fire, and
through the smoke rode the Four Wurgers of the Apocalypse.
And on their canopies was tattooed the number of the Beast, and the
number was 190." Jedi, Verse Five, Capter Two, The Book of Dweeb

   

[This message has been edited by flakbait (edited 03-05-2001).]

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #42 on: March 05, 2001, 07:15:00 AM »
 
Quote
Originally posted by Dune:
Preddy flew a P-40E with the 7th FS/49th FG.  (snipped) - This info from "George Preddy, Top Mustang Ace" by Joe Noah and Sam Sox.


It appears that Noah and Sox missed this one. Preddy's name does not appear on the 7th's roster. It does, however, appear on the roster of the 9th FS.

Sources:
The Official History of the 49th FG.
Protect and Avenge: The 49th FG in WWII by Ferguson and Pascalis.
Personal conversations with Bill Pascalis.

My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Westy

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2871
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #43 on: March 05, 2001, 08:36:00 AM »
Widewing, I wish I'd have been able to say what you said above. I usually botch it and get too personal with my reply"

"there is an entire cult dedicated to apologizing for the failure of the Luftwaffe and the Nazi leadership to defend Germany from the Allied horde."

You hit the nail on the head squarely.

 -Westy

Offline Jochen

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 188
      • http://www.jannousiainen.net
Macky Steinhoff talks about the P-38
« Reply #44 on: March 05, 2001, 08:49:00 AM »
 
Quote
In the battle of Britain the majority (large majority) of British planes were Hurricanes. And I believe the Brits were the ones out numbered. Also the Brits didn't have combat trained pilots. The Germans had every possible advantage on there side except range and the fact that they were fighting over NME territory. And the Germans still could not win.

roadkille. Ignorance or what but F4UDOA fails to mention that RAF had working radar chain which acted as force multiplier ie. direction planes where they were needed.

If that is not an advantage I dont know what is.

------------------
jochen Gefechtsverband Kowalewski

Units: I. and II./KG 51, II. and III./KG 76, NSGr 1, NSGr 2, NSGr 20.
Planes: Do 17Z, Ju 87D, Ju 88A, He 111H, Ar 234A, Me 410A, Me 262A, Fw 190A[/b, Fw 190F, Fw 190G.

Sieg oder bolsevismus!
jochen Gefechtsverband Kowalewski

Units: I. and II./KG 51, II. and III./KG 76, NSGr 1, NSGr 2, NSGr 20.
Planes: Do 17Z, Ju 87D, Ju 88A, He 111H, Ar 234A, Me 410A, Me 262A, Fw 190A, Fw 190F, Fw 190G.

Sieg oder bolsevismus!