i believe that if the virtual consequences were more representative of the real world consequences,
then the virtual behavior in the virtual environment would be more like the real behavior in the real world,
and the 90+ years of real world expertise would be more applicable to the video game.
if you do not agree then i guess we will remain in disagreement.
+S+
t
How so?
Like, if you die, you're just done playing? That's what it would take to get people to fly like they're lives depended on it, and even that wouldn't do it. People would just move to a new game, or create a new account. Maybe if HTC could add a RL death aspect to the subscription? You can't expect people to fear death, when death isn't a possibility...
Or do you have specific things you think need to be changed (rather than all the vague claims/references you've made so far) in the FM?
What should specifically happen if an F4U drops two notches of flaps in a fight with a Spit8, if the Spit8 is in front of the F4U, and how does the game differ from RL in this respect? Or pick your 190A8 as an example. What does it do differently than it should, specifically? Since you started with flap deployment, what speed should they drop in the 190A8, and what should be the effect? And would it be a good idea to drop them anyway?
Can you even present any examples from the
GAME (film, maybe) where you believe the FM is wrong? And back that opinion up with any factual RL examples?
Are you blowing smoke?
Is it possible that your frustration with the "FM" has more to do with your skill level? I agree with Anaxogoras, in that you don't need a great score to be a decent stick, but at the same time your score doesn't make you look very successful at all. It looks like I imagine
mine would if I just avoided 1v1 fights, and flew around high and fast looking for some cherry picking opportunities (that you then have trouble connecting on). I could be wrong of course- do you have any film of your fights? Showing your self-acclaimed 190A8 E-fighting prowess? I really have no interest in "ripping them apart", I'm just curious as to how you fight, and how it may skew your perception of the FM. Can you show yourself getting away with things you think you shouldn't be able to? Out-turning a spit with a full-flaps F4U, maybe? Or show others doing the same?
This is a crazy argument that just goes 'round and 'round. Of course, you could take the "easy route" and blame it on our inability to comprehend your writing, or claim that we're only selectively monitoring the conversation, but of course we could do that too. Look back at your own posts, do they flawlessly present an argument? How about some specifics for a change? You're the one claiming the game/FM is "broken"; show us the crack!
Since you're the one making the claims, the burden of proof falls on you. Your inability to present that proof doesn't mean we're selectively monitoring your argument, or that we can't comprehend it. Conversely, it's just as likely that your attempt to present a factual, comprehensive argument is a failure.