Author Topic: A-26 Invader  (Read 2561 times)

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
A-26 Invader
« on: January 28, 2010, 10:19:09 AM »
It's been way too long since the last A-26 request.  So, here goes:



Here's a link to a very recent post with videos about the A-26:
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,247368.0.html

And here's the video website itself:
http://www.zenoswarbirdvideos.com/MATINEE.html

Now, as for why I think we should have this aeroplane at some point in the near future (i.e. ASAP :P):

a) It came out in 3rd place in the vote HiTech Creations held, below the B-25 (first place) and the P-39 (second place).  We have had both the B-25 and P-39 added already, so it makes sense that the A-26 be added sooner rather than later.  In my opinion, the other planes which came after the A-26 should be added after the A-26 itself, for the simple reason that the vote represents what the players of this game want.  The results of that vote are in this thread:
http://bbs.hitechcreations.com/smf/index.php/topic,202838.0.html

b) It would be a very popular aeroplane amongst many players.  Whilst I am aware that there are a lot of people who want the He-111, the speed, survivability and firepower of the A-26 Invader would give it a very prominent role as a light bomber.

c) The A-26 is a good enough aeroplane in my view that it would be worthy of a perk point price.  If this were the case, it would give us all a much-needed way to spend our bomber perks (aside from the Ar-234, which at the end of the day is rather limited in its usefulness).

Now for some stats about the A-26B (Number built: 1355):

"Armament (Typical for early block A-26B): Two .50-cal. machine guns in a dorsal barbette, two .50-cal. machine guns in a ventral barbette and various combinations of forward-firing weapons: 75mm cannon, 37mm cannon and .50-cal. machine guns, plus provisions for 6,000 lbs. of bombs (4,000 lbs. internal and 2,000 lbs. external on wing racks); (Typical for early/mid block A-26B): Two .50-cal. machine guns in a dorsal barbette, two .50-cal. machine guns in a ventral barbette, and six forward-firing .50-cal. machine guns in the nose, plus provisions for 6,000 lbs. of bombs (4,000 lbs. internal and 2,000 lbs. external on wing racks), aircraft could be fitted with up to four wing-mounted gun pods each housing a pair of .50-cal. machine guns; (Typical for late block A-26B): Two .50-cal. machine guns in a dorsal barbette, two .50-cal. machine guns in a ventral barbette (sometimes omitted in favor of an extra fuel cell), eight forward-firing .50-cal. machine guns in the nose, and six .50-cal. machine guns in the wings, plus provisions for 6,000 lbs. of bombs (4,000 lbs. internal and 2,000 lbs. external on wing racks, 14 5-inch rockets could be carried in place of the wing-mounted bombs
Engines: Two Pratt & Whitney R-2800-27 radials of 2,000 hp each
Span: 70 ft. 0 in.
Length: 50 ft. 0 in.
Height: 18 ft. 6 in.
Weight: Approx. 35,000 lbs. gross takeoff weight
Maximum speed: 355 mph
Cruising speed: 284 mph
Range: 3,200 miles maximum ferry range
Service ceiling: 22,100 ft.
Crew: Three (pilot, navigator/cannon loader, gunner)
Serial numbers: 41-39100 to 41-39151; 41-39153 to 41-39192; 41-39194; 41-39196 to 41-39198; 41-39201 to 41-39599; 43-22252 to 43-22303; 43-22305 to 43-22307; 43-22313 to 43-22345; 43-22350 to 43-22466; 44-34098 to 44-34753"
All the above stats are from this website: http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=3060


Here are some links containing information on the A-26:

http://www.warbirdalley.com/a26.htm

http://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=91

http://members.tripod.com/a26invader/
« Last Edit: January 28, 2010, 10:46:35 AM by Yossarian »
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline Denholm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9667
      • No. 603 Squadron
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2010, 10:30:26 AM »
I disagree for reasons stated in the past. We have plenty of American bombers and attack planes in the plane-set. It's time we looked at countries lacking (Russia, Italy, Japan, and Germany).
Get your Daily Dose of Flame!
FlameThink.com
No. 603 Squadron... Visit us on the web, if you dare.

Drug addicts are always disappointed after eating Pot Pies.

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10166
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2010, 10:38:01 AM »
+1 to the A-26.  Let HTC decide priority. :aok
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #3 on: January 28, 2010, 10:51:09 AM »
I disagree for reasons stated in the past. We have plenty of American bombers and attack planes in the plane-set. It's time we looked at countries lacking (Russia, Italy, Japan, and Germany).

Good point, but I think there's two different things to balance here.  Firstly, the category of bombers in AH overall, and as you say the various countries the planes come from.  In my opinion, you're definitely right about needing more bombers from other countries, however I think that a more pressing need is that of another perked bomber - that seems to be a far more serious hole in the plane set right now, and one which cannot be compensated for in any way.  IMO the A-26 fulfills all the requirements to be a perked bomber, and adding it would patch a major gap in the plane set.
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline cobia38

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2010, 11:21:09 AM »

  Build it..... and they will come    :noid


  Harvesting taters,one  K4 at a time

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6437
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2010, 11:49:53 AM »
Bring it on.  Would like the glass nose Mossie as another possible perk bomber. "Nigh uncatchable."
"Then out spake brave Horatius, the Captain of the gate:
 To every man upon this earth, death cometh soon or late.
 And how can man die better, than facing fearful odds.
 For the ashes of his fathers and the temples of his Gods."

Offline saantana

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 763
      • Dywizjon 308
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2010, 11:52:21 AM »
A lot of other planes are needed more and earlier. HTC needs more coading powaaaaaaaaa!
Saantana
308 Polish Squadron RAF
http://dywizjon308.servegame.org

"I have fought a good fight, I have finished the course, I have kept my faith"

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2010, 12:16:00 PM »
A lot of other planes are needed more and earlier.

Needed by who?
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2010, 12:23:07 PM »
Needed by who?

The value of an aircraft is NOT decided by its utility in the Mains.

FSO/AVA/Special Events has a FAR more pressing need for the:

Ki-43
G4M
Ki-44
He-111
Beaufighter

than we have for yet ANOTHER late-war monster plane. You're talking five of THE most important players in their respective theaters--the Ki-43, G4M and He-111 ESPECIALLY--that are missing from the game. So tell me, why should a plane that saw only limited action towards the very end of the war take precedence over aircraft that had a SIGNIFICANT impact?
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2010, 01:21:05 PM »
The value of an aircraft is NOT decided by its utility in the Mains.

I do beleive you are correct!

Look at the B-25,P-39 and the Brewster!!

Late war monsters indeed!
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP

Offline AWwrgwy

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5478
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2010, 01:52:11 PM »
+1 to the A-26.  Let HTC decide priority. :aok

Perhaps he already has....

 :devil

wrongway
71 (Eagle) Squadron
"THAT"S PAINT!!"

"If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through."
- General Sir Anthony Cecil Hogmanay

Offline jolly22

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1587
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2010, 02:09:43 PM »
I disagree for reasons stated in the past. We have plenty of American bombers and attack planes in the plane-set. It's time we looked at countries lacking (Russia, Italy, Japan, and Germany).


G55!!

3./JG 53 cheerleader - Battle Over The Winter Line - FLY AXIS - JRjolly

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2010, 04:07:22 PM »
Bring it on.  Would like the glass nose Mossie as another possible perk bomber. "Nigh uncatchable."
Mosquito B.Mk XVI would probably need a bit of a perk price.  It can carry a 4000lb 'cookie' about as fast as the Ar234 can go when laden.

Mosquito B.Mk IV would not need to be perked.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline waystin2

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10166
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2010, 04:26:58 PM »
Perhaps he already has....

 :devil

wrongway

Possibly, I really do not know.  I just get a little irked at all the "we need insert plane or vehicle name here before the plane/vehicle that the thread is requesting" responses.  If you want a plane or vehicle added, then request it. There, all better now....rant over. :D
CO for the Pigs On The Wing
& The nicest guy in Aces High!

Offline whiteman

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4206
Re: A-26 Invader
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2010, 04:29:01 PM »
I do beleive you are correct!

Look at the B-25,P-39 and the Brewster!!

Late war monsters indeed!

and all three have filled in holes for the events Saxman listed.