Originally posted by Dowding:
Remember that the German high command could have unconditionally surrendered at any time and put a halt to the bombing, the very same day. They are the true criminals - if they didn't give a flying shag about their own people, why should the allies?
why? because doing otherwise would be falling to the same level as their enemies'.
And remember 1940? london bombings? should have Churchill surrendered AT ONCE?. War is hell, right?, and if his civilian population is being bombed day and night, is because he (he and his clearly criminal and biased high command) is a criminal for not surrendering right?.
That line of argument STINKS, m8.
About your argument on the German High command, you know, there were several plots against hitler's life all during the war?. Of course is very easy,isnt it?. You decide that you want the war to end, but happens that Hitler doenst want. What do you do?
1944 plot against hitler is a good show of what do you do, and what do you risk for failing in doing it. Seems you have a short memory right?.
So, war is hell. Perfect. Then why Nuremberg, condemning soldiers?. Then why did Doenitz go to prison for 15 years?. Then why was Goering sentenced to death?. Then why was the major part of the German wehrmacht and luftwaffe's high command sent to prison?. War is hell right?.
Then either of two things: either you do the same trial on the Allies high commanders (Lockwood, Harris, Lemay, even Churchill, stalin, Zukhov,etc...)...or you dont do it at all.
Nuremberg was the epitome of the unfairness, regarding the armed forces. (NOTE I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT THE DEATH CAMPS AND EXTERMINATION, I TALK ABOUT MILITARY CHARGES ONLY).
As I said...Vae victis.
[This message has been edited by R4M (edited 03-27-2001).]