to Ghost , who said
"Or, you can whine, and you see how much sympathy that gets you around here."
"I'll give you another one for free, quit complaining about toolshedders!"
Fisrt.
Nobody are whining.
Second
You don't give me properly NOTHING!
And becaefull to use this mafia leanguage with me or You will loose my respect for You!
(I cannot belive You did that, perhaps i read bad Your line. I hope for You.)
Third
If noe bombers could be the problem, then operate on they.
"Adapt, etc." <--- i was not speaking about these.
To WMlute, who said: "NOE Hoards do NOT promote combat."
"Yes this change promotes the combat element as it forces players to have to fight if they want that base"
Otherwise furballing gangbanging is a combat?
I spent a lot's of effort in defending field from any kind of attak, noe ones included.
So old style radar did not reduce combat element as You say.
For the rest, WMlute Your arguments seems to me a paralogism only.
I repeat. I post this not for a lak of skill (what skill can have You with a 65 fts noe alt settings!)
Last night, with new feature, i did well too. In 2 hours, I did not ho anybody
but many so-called aces ho me. except a p51 at 133 field, probably flown, by a loose deuce pilot.
Good guys, except Chewi!
But i was very brb to do furball every time!
About HTC, is quite obviously that they can decide what they think better.
As to me they understimate very much that many players play for fun not for scoring
or to win the war. Their methods is quite buggy I said. Let's tray new feature in one
arena, and observe what happens would be better.
To Lusche, who said: "It wasn't the newbies that were running constant horde NOE's against constantly changing targets to avoid any opposition and to roll a map."
Where did You see this? At the cinemascope!
No, that was star wars film!
Lushe are You a teacher?
