Author Topic: How about the A26?  (Read 3228 times)

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #60 on: July 21, 2010, 04:45:15 PM »
In AW the Vader flew like a poni with a second engine on 25% fuel with more guns blazing than Dodge City on a Saturday night. Oh, yeah, add bombs and it was it's own airforce.

The P38 was a Tie fighter and outclassed everything. Then the Me110 was introduced and for awhile outlooped and out turned the spit9. The Vader just about did as long as I remembered. The Dora was introduced and flew faster than everything but the 262 for awhile and looped and turned WITH the spit9 and outclimbed it on wep. Then Leviathins favorite, Oh, back then, he was a punk college kid named "deadf", the La5. It was faster than the spit9, out climbed it and turned with it. The N1K2 was added and it out turned the spit9, out climbed everything but the P38 on wep, and had four cannons to spray with. 999000 still killed them all with his B17...... :angel:

So which A26 Invader are these SIM fans begging for ACK-ACK?

The one from the SIM where the B-17 was able to out turn any fighter in the game and the P-38J could out flat turn a Spit 9 on the deck.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #61 on: July 21, 2010, 05:13:59 PM »
The one from the SIM where the B-17 was able to out turn any fighter in the game and the P-38J could out flat turn a Spit 9 on the deck.

ack-ack

Yeah, I remember that one, 1989 or so. Wasen't it called "Air Weirdos" or "Aero Weirds" or "Air Wallabes" or something like that... ;)....Loved those bright red dot tracers though. Was it 2 or 3 colors of tracers to choose from? It actually had a Lead Computing gun sight and rear view mirrors that I always got backwards when I hat switched to it. And those red cones that flickered on the end of the 262 engine pods. Half the time you joined as a buff gunner you got booted from the game......Yeah that one.

Had a 38 pilot show me a gamey trick to beat the 38 with the spit9 in a flat turn fight. Start pumping the nose up and down in a slow sine wave and in about two circle revolutions your spit is on the 38's six. It worked up to AW3. Tried that in AH1 when I first started flying and got the dreded don't move your controls too fast message...... :) 

The Vader I remember from AW would have to be perked right up there with the 262 in Aces High. Sorta like replacing the P51-D with the Martin Baker MB 5.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin-Baker_MB_5
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17423
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #62 on: July 21, 2010, 09:37:16 PM »
well if it doesn't turn as well as in AW we Can always use it to ho everthing in AH. The a26 had the most guns of amything else and it would make an awesome town buster.  Btw akak do you know that you are against almost anything that is asked to be added/changed in the game?


Semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #63 on: July 21, 2010, 09:56:42 PM »
Btw akak do you know that you are against almost anything that is asked to be added/changed in the game?


Semp

No, you're wrong.  I have never been against adding the A-26, I would like to eventually see it in the game but it rightly shouldn't be a high priority when there are so many gaps in the existing plane set.  Also, there are dozens of planes in our current plane set that have yet to be brought up to AH2 standards. 

I am against wishes that are born out of ignorance or a squeaker's desire just to get some uber plane or ground vehicle to help make up for their lack of skill.


ack-ack

"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #64 on: July 21, 2010, 10:19:41 PM »
So has anyone yet asked the "unintended consiqunces" list of questions for all of the bright shiny new toy I gotta have it assertions with no admission to why you WANT this new toy?

Lets see....

A20 - 4klbs bombs internal external, 6 .50 cal nose, 330+- top speed.
B26 - 4-6klbs bombs internal, 4 .50cal fixed forward, 287+- top speed.
A26B - 4-6klbs internal and 2klbs external, +-8 .50cal forward firing with 8 additional in wing pods, 355 +- top speed. A26C Glass Nose - 370+- top speed.

C-models were fitted with more powerful engines in the form of 2 x Pratt & Whitney R-2800 engines of 2,000 horsepower each with water injection. Wings were also strengthened to mount up to 14 x 5" rockets or 2,000lbs of bombs. The wings were slightly altered to accommodate 6 x 12.7mm wing-mounted machine guns to make up for the lack of punch caused by the removal of the nose-mounted armament common to the B-models. 1,091 A-26C models were delivered.

The Douglas Invader's lethality was furthermore accented by the option of carrying between 4,000 and 8,000lbs of internal and external ordnance in the form of drop bombs or 8 to 14 x 5" rockets (the latter held externally on eight or fourteen underwing pylons - the full 16 rocket deployment was achievable in lieu of the drop tanks and wing mounted bombs). In fact, Invaders were known to be able to carry greater bombloads than that as found on the larger Boeing B-17 Flying Fortresses. Endurance could be extended with the addition of 165-gallon underwing drop tanks, increasing the aircraft's range by up to 300 miles. C-model Invaders with the glassed-in nose were fitted with 2 x 12.7mm machine guns in the nose along with the 2 x 12.7mm gun systems in each turret but forward firepower was augmented with the addition of the 6 x wing-mounted machine guns.


Welcome to the AH ultimate CV killing Lancstuka B or C Model. Not to mention it will become the spit16 of the AH bomber world.
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline cobia38

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1258
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #65 on: July 21, 2010, 10:51:52 PM »

  the idea is to have another perk ride to spend our bomber points on, other then the 234
    so perk it at say 200


  Harvesting taters,one  K4 at a time

Offline 1carbine

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 237
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #66 on: July 21, 2010, 11:14:38 PM »
So has anyone yet asked the "unintended consiqunces" list of questions for all of the bright shiny new toy I gotta have it assertions with no admission to why you WANT this new toy?

Lets see....

A20 - 4klbs bombs internal external, 6 .50 cal nose, 330+- top speed.
B26 - 4-6klbs bombs internal, 4 .50cal fixed forward, 287+- top speed.
A26B - 4-6klbs internal and 2klbs external, +-8 .50cal forward firing with 8 additional in wing pods, 355 +- top speed. A26C Glass Nose - 370+- top speed.

C-models were fitted with more powerful engines in the form of 2 x Pratt & Whitney R-2800 engines of 2,000 horsepower each with water injection. Wings were also strengthened to mount up to 14 x 5" rockets or 2,000lbs of bombs. The wings were slightly altered to accommodate 6 x 12.7mm wing-mounted machine guns to make up for the lack of punch caused by the removal of the nose-mounted armament common to the B-models. 1,091 A-26C models were delivered.

The Douglas Invader's lethality was furthermore accented by the option of carrying between 4,000 and 8,000lbs of internal and external ordnance in the form of drop bombs or 8 to 14 x 5" rockets (the latter held externally on eight or fourteen underwing pylons - the full 16 rocket deployment was achievable in lieu of the drop tanks and wing mounted bombs). In fact, Invaders were known to be able to carry greater bombloads than that as found on the larger Boeing B-17 Flying Fortresses. Endurance could be extended with the addition of 165-gallon underwing drop tanks, increasing the aircraft's range by up to 300 miles. C-model Invaders with the glassed-in nose were fitted with 2 x 12.7mm machine guns in the nose along with the 2 x 12.7mm gun systems in each turret but forward firepower was augmented with the addition of the 6 x wing-mounted machine guns.


Welcome to the AH ultimate CV killing Lancstuka B or C Model. Not to mention it will become the spit16 of the AH bomber world.

More like spit 14 cause it would have to be perked.
Obama is the Energizer bunny of fail.

_|o[____]o
[1---L-OllllllO-
()_)()_)=°°=)_)

Offline bustr

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12436
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #67 on: July 21, 2010, 11:55:51 PM »
Wonder how the AH prototype has turned out in HiTech's sandbox?
bustr - POTW 1st Wing


This is like the old joke that voters are harsher to their beer brewer if he has an outage, than their politicians after raising their taxes. Death and taxes are certain but, fun and sex is only now.

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17423
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #68 on: July 22, 2010, 12:46:50 AM »
No, you're wrong.  I have never been against adding the A-26, I would like to eventually see it in the game but it rightly shouldn't be a high priority when there are so many gaps in the existing plane set.  Also, there are dozens of planes in our current plane set that have yet to be brought up to AH2 standards. 

I am against wishes that are born out of ignorance or a squeaker's desire just to get some uber plane or ground vehicle to help make up for their lack of skill.


ack-ack



Which planes are not up to AH standards?  If they are not then they should be removed. 

As for wishes born out of ignorance, well we are not as educated as you are.  But, that's why its called a wish.  As in I wish it would be added because it would see more use than any of the other airplanes that people want to add so they sit pretty in the hangar.  :airplane: and  :bolt:.


semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline Yossarian

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #69 on: July 22, 2010, 05:44:32 AM »
Which planes are not up to AH standards?  If they are not then they should be removed. 


I think he means a lot of the planes in the game now haven't been updated to have the latest graphics.
Afk for a year or so.  The name of a gun turret in game.  Falanx, huh? :banana:
Apparently I'm in the 20th FG 'Loco Busters', or so the legend goes.
O o
/Ż________________________
| IMMA FIRIN' MAH 75MM!!!
\_ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6487
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #70 on: July 22, 2010, 06:09:37 AM »


I am against wishes that are born out of ignorance or a squeaker's desire just to get some uber plane or ground vehicle to help make up for their lack of skill.


ack-ack



That's taken care of.  We already have the Wirblewind and the Spit XVI.
Snuggie - voted "Sexiest Man Alive" for the entire Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #71 on: July 22, 2010, 05:43:55 PM »
That's taken care of.  We already have the Wirblewind and the Spit XVI.
The Spitfire LF.Mk IX (Spifire Mk XVI in AH2) was the most produced version of the Spitfire other than the Spitfire Mk Vc.  It played a major role in WWII.  Care to revise your thoughts?
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline caldera

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6487
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #72 on: July 22, 2010, 06:12:18 PM »
The Spitfire LF.Mk IX (Spifire Mk XVI in AH2) was the most produced version of the Spitfire other than the Spitfire Mk Vc.  It played a major role in WWII.  Care to revise your thoughts?

AH2's Spit XVI is easy mode no matter what my thoughts pertaining to it are.  Doesn't matter if they made just one or a million and one.
Snuggie - voted "Sexiest Man Alive" for the entire Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere!

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #73 on: July 22, 2010, 06:19:03 PM »
AH2's Spit XVI is easy mode no matter what my thoughts pertaining to it are.  Doesn't matter if they made just one or a million and one.

The Spitfire in real life had the same reputation as being easy and forgiving to fly, a real fighter pilot's dream.  Why should it be different in game?  Also, the Spitfire Mk XVI in game isn't any different in regards to ease of flying than any of the other Spitfires.  Before the Spitfire Mk XVI, people were whining about the Spitfire Mk V and Seafire.

ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline 1Boner

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2285
Re: How about the A26?
« Reply #74 on: July 22, 2010, 06:21:01 PM »
No, you're wrong.  I have never been against adding the A-26, I would like to eventually see it in the game but it rightly shouldn't be a high priority when there are so many gaps in the existing plane set.  Also, there are dozens of planes in our current plane set that have yet to be brought up to AH2 standards. 

I am against wishes that are born out of ignorance or a squeaker's desire just to get some uber plane or ground vehicle to help make up for their lack of skill.


ack-ack



Gaps AND skill in one post!!

Folks, I thinkz we gotz a winna!!   :rofl :rofl
"Life is just as deadly as it looks"  Richard Thompson

"So umm.... just to make sure I have this right.  What you are asking is for the bombers carrying bombs, to stop dropping bombs on the bombs, so the bombers can carry bombs to bomb things with?"  AKP