I'm having a hard time visualizing "excessive recoil" from a 40 Short & Weak in even the most compact version I've seen. 
It is so hard to imagine that some people have joint injuries, smaller hands, or thinner cartilage at various joints such as the wrist?
Imagine how irritating it would be if I went around talking about how I have a hard time visualizing anyone needing eyeglasses, since my vision is 20/10 uncorrected. Or how I have a hard time visualizing people getting airsick since I do not. Or how I have a hard time visualizing people being unable to swim a mile in 20 minutes or swim up the SoCal coastline from LaJolla Cove to LaJolla Shores and back in under 2 hours. Or have a hard time visualizing people who cannot avoid getting speeding tickets. Or how I have a hard time visualizing people who can't fit into pants with greater than 32" waist. Or...

The CHP did a study and determined that it would be cheaper to pay off CHP officers for wrist injuries than to switch to a different gun. The S&W .40s they issue are known to cause wrist injuries. I fired my Dad's service pistol and it twists badly in my hand, and it isn't even considered a "compact" pistol. I am quite certain that if I had to fire that gun routinely as part of my job, I'd end up with a permanent injury from it. That's why when I bought my own .40 pistol, I went with the full size beretta. Not only does training with it directly benefit my mandatory USAF weapons training, but also because it recoils straight and the extra weight of the gun makes it a lot less damaging to my wrist.
Then again, the most painful gun I ever fired was a teeny tiny .30 subcompact auto... That thing felt like someone whacking my hand and wrist with a tip of a screwdriver, since the gun's size and shape meant that the recoil was transmitted directly to one of the nerve junctions in the wrist. It wasn't a very strong recoil, but it was sharp and directly impacted that nerve junction. Hurt like hell.