Author Topic: Bf-109T  (Read 1407 times)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #30 on: September 15, 2010, 09:55:03 PM »
i think we need to bring back the G-10, but i know that has been requested numerous times
As I have asked in each of those threads, so shall I ask here.  Why?  Why do we need the Bf109G-10?  It fills no gap.  The Bf109G-6/AS or Bf109G-14/AS would be a great addition, but the Bf109G-10, no.  It came later than the Bf109K-4.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Chalenge

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15179
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #31 on: September 16, 2010, 03:36:24 AM »
At Pearl Harbor?   

I am beginning to better understand you for the moonbat you are!  :rolleyes:

OP: You are free to fly any plane to any of your carriers and land and rearm there. Its also very easy to land an E4 on the CV and takeoff again... even on one that is turning.
If you like the Sick Puppy Custom Sound Pack the please consider contributing for future updates by sending a months dues to Hitech Creations for account "Chalenge." Every little bit helps.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #32 on: September 16, 2010, 08:00:20 AM »
I am beginning to better understand you for the moonbat you are!  :rolleyes:

OP: You are free to fly any plane to any of your carriers and land and rearm there. Its also very easy to land an E4 on the CV and takeoff again... even on one that is turning.

Sure thing Voss.   Go preach to the masses about your timid arse saving gas at 30k.   
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #33 on: September 16, 2010, 08:01:42 AM »
i think we need to bring back the G-10, but i know that has been requested numerous times

The G-10 does not fill any void.   As others have stated previously, the G-6A/S or G-14A/S would be preferred.
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline IrishOne

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1529
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #34 on: September 16, 2010, 09:59:24 AM »
I am beginning to better understand you for the moonbat you are!  :rolleyes:

OP: You are free to fly any plane to any of your carriers and land and rearm there. Its also very easy to land an E4 on the CV and takeoff again... even on one that is turning.

WTF is a moonbat?  Do you just make this stuff up as you go?  look around, thats not a real word!    and hey man, be careful.  you could get stung by another scorpion.   I hear scorpion stings are real hell if you already have brain cancer.  I bet the CIA would still let you go on ops; i hear you're just that damn good.


i don't think the OP gives a crap about what you can and can't land on a cv.  

oh yeah, i vote  :aok on the 109E7, no to the 109T.  
-AoM-

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #35 on: September 16, 2010, 11:03:22 AM »
If we get any more 109s i need my





M-18 :noid
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #36 on: September 16, 2010, 01:01:44 PM »
A early 109 would fill in for the "F" on BoB event.  +1

Yes, we will get the  M+18..............when you are no longer playing AH.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20387
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #37 on: September 16, 2010, 02:53:06 PM »
A early 109 would fill in for the "F" on BoB event.  +1

Yes, we will get the  M+18..............when you are no longer playing AH.

109F in the B of B?  Which B of B are we talking about?  109E4 that we have covers the B of B just fine thanks.  109E7 would post B of B and cover the North African, MTO, Russia etc bits.  It hung on as a fighter bomber for a bit after the F showed up too.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline oakranger

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8380
      • http://www.slybirds.com/
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #38 on: September 16, 2010, 03:34:12 PM »
109F in the B of B?  Which B of B are we talking about?  109E4 that we hh
ave covers the B of B just fine thanks.  109E7 would post B of B and cover the North African, MTO, Russia etc bits.  It hung on as a fighter bomber for a bit after the F showed up too.


Sorry, forgot we have the E4.
Oaktree

56th Fighter group

Offline perdue3

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4693
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #39 on: September 16, 2010, 06:03:56 PM »
There were some tail hook versions used in Northern Scandinavia. The tail hooks allowed for a very short landing which was necessary in terrible weather. But I do not think any saw combat up there.

Yes it would be nice to have a 109 off of a boat but it's not going to happen. And krusty, the 109T would be an E-7 in comparison.


perdweeb
C.O. Kommando Nowotny 

FlyKommando.com

 

Offline 321BAR

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6140
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #40 on: September 16, 2010, 06:46:28 PM »
A early 109 would fill in for the "F" on BoB event.  +1

Yes, we will get the  M+18..............when you are no longer playing AH.
M-18!!! :furious :noid
I am in need of a new epic quote
Happy Jack's Go Buggy

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20387
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #41 on: September 16, 2010, 11:29:17 PM »
There were some tail hook versions used in Northern Scandinavia. The tail hooks allowed for a very short landing which was necessary in terrible weather. But I do not think any saw combat up there.

Yes it would be nice to have a 109 off of a boat but it's not going to happen. And krusty, the 109T would be an E-7 in comparison.


perdweeb

The 109T in question were the ones sent to Norway.  Modified E models.  E7 would make more sense by far in terms of Russian Front, MTO, ETO, North Africa.  That being said, we've got plenty of 109s just like we have plenty of Spits.

Other birds first if my opinion.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
Re: Bf-109T
« Reply #42 on: September 16, 2010, 11:39:27 PM »
WTF is a moonbat?  Do you just make this stuff up as you go?  look around, thats not a real word!    and hey man, be careful.  you could get stung by another scorpion.   I hear scorpion stings are real hell if you already have brain cancer.  I bet the CIA would still let you go on ops; i hear you're just that damn good.


i don't think the OP gives a crap about what you can and can't land on a cv.  

oh yeah, i vote  :aok on the 109E7, no to the 109T.  

     I thought it was a scorpion bite, but apparently it was just a sting after all  :rofl  Fortunately I don't
fly F-16s for the CIA or own a P-51, so I'm pretty sure I'm safe :aok
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars