right, because personal attacks are a better contribution to this thread rather than posting technical info.
getting no concrete evidence regarding this issue, i wouldnt be surprised if this same argument come up again two years (or earlier) from now.
Its not a personal attack. Its a warning to anyone reading this thread to take your posts with a Michigan highway spreader's truckload of salt. Because you haven't posted any unbiased technical info, all you've done is been a rather loud AMD fanboy.
I'll even give you that at the low end there's probably some AMD systems that run Aces High better than an equally priced Intel system, even with the "Aces High only runs on one core on AMD CPUs" problem holding it back. You certainly haven't told us anything new other than to refute perceived slander against AMD's good name.
Your "
unbiased peer-reviewed facts" came from, as Skuzzy pointed out, an AMD sales pitch. You lost all credibility at that point. Anyone listening to anything you say now, would be a fool.
Here's the bottom line for anyone new to this thread:
Intel for Aces High. AMD is perfectly good for other applications, but for your money, you're almost certainly better off with an Intel CPU for Aces High, because Aces High only runs on one core in a multi-core AMD cpu, while on Intel CPUs, it'll use two cores.
If anyone wants to refute that, please don't bring "facts" from an AMD sales pitch.
