Bf109F4

[FLS]

Even a child under 9 can learn to respect other people's choices.   

While you've made it clear that you'd like an improved Bf109F-4 to get an edge over other early war aircraft you haven't given any reasons why it would be a good idea.

[BrownBaron]

I've landed several tri, quad, or quintuple kill sorties in the F4 in the past week alone. It has advantages, or an "edge", over pretty much any plane in the set. It's fine the way it is.

[Karnak]

thats because spitfires are for losers who suck

if im going to let my kid my play im gonna set him up with a late model spitfire because its accessible....

And with that post you have revealed yourself to be a massively biased fanboy who's opinion isn't worth the electrons it took to transmit it.

Nothing you say from this point forward has any validity.

[Imowface]

I prefer to 1v1 different planes in the F-4 then any other 109, IMHO its the best 109 for furballing and turning, though I mostly fly the K-4 because I find it much easier to kill with then the F-4,G-2,G-6

[Boozeman]

I think the F4 already has a good competetive edge against all other EW rides that are freely available. 

[R 105]

The 109F-4 and the 109G-2 are my two favorite 109s in the game. While I like how the K-4s fly, I can't hit anything with the big gun. All 109s in the game have wep. So they are like late war up dates anyway and are fine as they are.

[dirtdart]

I think the OPs is saying our present 109F is a combination of times/airframes.  I will consult the 109 parchments when I get home, and ack-ack, I do consider myself a 109 Experten, lol.  I am not, however, a Spit hater. 

On all other post point, yes the 109 F4 is fine the way it is.  It does not have the top end to go head to head with LW planes, so in it's present modelling I find it adequate. 

[JOACH1M]

109f perfect the way it is now

[pervert]

I think the OPs is saying our present 109F is a combination of times/airframes.  I will consult the 109 parchments when I get home, and ack-ack, I do consider myself a 109 Experten, lol.  I am not, however, a Spit hater. 

On all other post point, yes the 109 F4 is fine the way it is.  It does not have the top end to go head to head with LW planes, so in it's present modelling I find it adequate. 

There are only 10 109 experten in this game, you are not privy to the secret experten's forum therefore you are not a member nor are you entitled to call yourself 'experten' please stop this unsanctioned use of our word or the lawyers will be called in. That is all 

[Imowface]

I shall make a new word for myself then, <experten in training 

[milesobrian]

Even a child under 9 can learn to respect other people's choices.   

While you've made it clear that you'd like an improved Bf109F-4 to get an edge over other early war aircraft you haven't given any reasons why it would be a good idea.

when did i say i wanted an edge against other early war air craft if anything i specifically mentioned the late war arena...this is just more fools putting words into my mouth

[FLS]

when did i say i wanted an edge against other early war air craft if anything i specifically mentioned the late war arena...this is just more fools putting words into my mouth

You said this in your original post.

... so the 109f4 can get some competive edge vs other low eny planes...

Your use of "other" was confusing. It seemed like you meant to say aircraft similar to the 109F. It's like your use of "more fools" to refer to a single person. When you don't write clearly you can hardly complain if you are misunderstood.

If you'd like some help with the Bf109F-4 come see me in the Training arena.

[Karnak]

when did i say i wanted an edge against other early war air craft if anything i specifically mentioned the late war arena...this is just more fools putting words into my mouth

Which was the point I replied against whereupon you went into an anti-Spitfire polemic.

My point was that the intention is not to make things like the 1941 Bf109F-4 and Spitfire Vb their most competitive against 1944/45 aircraft.  It is to make them appropriate for 1941 settings.  That is why when I suggested a Spitfire lineup I suggested changing the Spitfire Vc to the less competitive, but more appropriate for 1941 and general type progression, Spitfire Vb.

Sadly, you couldn't see through the red haze induced by seeing the word "Spitfire".

[Masherbrum]

thats because spitfires are for losers who suck

if im going to let my kid my play im gonna set him up with a late model spitfire because its accessible....

I bet you fly in Spitfires too.   

[LLogann]

Anybody know his ingame?   

I bet you fly in Spitfires too.