Really... so your saying that a spitfire is as durable as a P-47??! I'd really like to see how. Did a spitfire take a full auto load from a 190, no. The P-47 was a tank and could take that kind of punishment, the only reason why the P-47 sucks so bad at durability in AH is because it's undermodeled and the uber ack.
He never stated that the Spitfire was as rugged as the P-47, you misunderstood because you lack the basics of reading comprehension.
LOL, go look at some real gun footage
Again, please point out where I said the Spitfire was a "damage sponge". If you were to have someone that can comprehend what people write, have them read to you my original post again. They'll explain it to you slowly that I was telling MachFly his survival was more due to poor gunnery of the other player and the lack of hitting MachFly at the convergence point of the other guy's guns. Had the other guy been a better shot, MachFly's Spitfire wouldn't have absorbed the damage that his plane did.
Really... so your saying that a spitfire is as durable as a P-47??! I'd really like to see how. Did a spitfire take a full auto load from a 190, no. The P-47 was a tank and could take that kind of punishment, the only reason why the P-47 sucks so bad at durability in AH is because it's undermodeled and the uber ack.
How is the P-47 (which model?) under modeled? Or is this claim come from the same place you pulled your claims of the Spitfire XVI or did you watch something of YouTube again?
ack-ack