Author Topic: "and now for something completely defiant"  (Read 1290 times)

Offline Tinribs

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 175
"and now for something completely defiant"
« on: May 22, 2011, 06:21:30 AM »
It wasnt very good but for some reason I allways loved this plane,best fighting tactics to circle and lose alt rapidly hmm would be interesting to see what some of the top sticks in game could make of it. :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ce9My4IKydo
I carnt relax cos I havent done a thing and I carnt do a thing cos I carnt relax.

Offline gyrene81

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11629
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2011, 08:20:35 AM »
you really really really want to get ho'd don't you?  :lol  may as well look at the blackburn skua and the fairey fulmar...at least they had a chance.  :D
jarhed  
Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day...
Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett

Offline Tinribs

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2011, 09:37:36 AM »
you really really really want to get ho'd don't you?  :lol  may as well look at the blackburn skua and the fairey fulmar...at least they had a chance.  :D
Its not comparable to the skua or fulmar at all,you are gonna get ho`d anyway so you may as well give them an excuse for it.Im sure that given the amount of flying hours and lack of death(sudden illness,catastrophic electrical failure allways possible)compared to the real pilots that flew these planes we would find a way to make it reasonably successful.
It could take a while but most of us like a challenge. :uhoh
I carnt relax cos I havent done a thing and I carnt do a thing cos I carnt relax.

Offline iron650

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 662
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2011, 05:24:56 PM »
+1

It served in the Blitz. Also, from the source and another it didn't say anything about forward mounted guns or bomb load. Does anybody else have information on that?  :headscratch:

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #4 on: May 22, 2011, 05:34:09 PM »
I think it will be a hangar queen
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #5 on: May 22, 2011, 06:30:23 PM »
+1

It served in the Blitz. Also, from the source and another it didn't say anything about forward mounted guns or bomb load. Does anybody else have information on that?  :headscratch:
It had no forward firing guns and as it was a poor performer due to the weight of the turret I'd be very surprised if they ever even considered trying to enable it to carry bombs.  That it was also essentially helpless in daylight operations would have also argued against any attempt to use it to drop bombs.

Other than a little bit of initial success it was a dismal failure in daylight operations and lacked the performance to be effective as a night fighter, though it did have some success there.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #6 on: May 22, 2011, 10:25:42 PM »
That folks were sent into combat in those things was an absolute crime.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #7 on: May 22, 2011, 10:31:21 PM »
to the OP:   :rofl nice title...


now seriously...

maybe historically it had no truly effective role in WWII, but in AH, i can see it being used (however rarely) as a kind of extra tail gun on bomber raids. park it around back, and chill with the bomber stream. tada!!
on the other hand, until the other, more important/effective aircraft/tanks/boats are added to the game, i think it should be kept out.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #8 on: May 22, 2011, 11:53:22 PM »
maybe historically it had no truly effective role in WWII, but in AH, i can see it being used (however rarely) as a kind of extra tail gun on bomber raids. park it around back, and chill with the bomber stream. tada!!
on the other hand, until the other, more important/effective aircraft/tanks/boats are added to the game, i think it should be kept out.
Wouldn't it be a lot more effective for that player to take an additional formation of bombers?

Defiant wouldn't even be able to keep up with the Ki-67 or Boston Mk III.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Tinribs

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #9 on: May 23, 2011, 02:29:19 PM »
Of  course you are all right and as I said from the start it wasnt much good but this is a game and not reality, it would be an interesting plane to fly being that in the main part your best tactics would be a complete opposite of every other fighter in the hanger. :headscratch:
I carnt relax cos I havent done a thing and I carnt do a thing cos I carnt relax.

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #10 on: May 23, 2011, 03:37:20 PM »
Wouldn't it be a lot more effective for that player to take an additional formation of bombers?

Defiant wouldn't even be able to keep up with the Ki-67 or Boston Mk III.

yeah, it would be, but if it were a b-29 only mission, and a bunch of VR pilots didnt have the perks for the 29, they could just up the defiant, and tada.

unfortunately, your last point erases my first (^) point altogether. youre right.
                                                                   |
                                                                   |

Offline M0nkey_Man

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2254
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #11 on: May 23, 2011, 04:42:36 PM »
poor bombers, all they would here is pingpingpingpingpingpingpingp ingpingpingpingpingpingpingpi ngpingpingpingpingpingpingpin gpingpingpingpingpingping
FlyKommando.com


"Tip of the dull butter knife"
delta07

Offline B3YT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #12 on: May 24, 2011, 05:24:44 PM »
not really I find the Hurricane MkIa very effective against most bombers if you hit the right place.   engines mostly .303 seem to do damage them  just as well as 50cal.
As the cleaners say :"once more unto the bleach"

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2011, 07:53:27 PM »
not really I find the Hurricane MkIa very effective against most bombers if you hit the right place.   engines mostly .303 seem to do damage them  just as well as 50cal.

when did the hurri come into this?

Offline Pigslilspaz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3378
Re: "and now for something completely defiant"
« Reply #14 on: May 25, 2011, 02:39:06 AM »
when did the hurri come into this?
Hurri Mk I and Hurri Mk IIA/IIB had the same guns as in the turret, browning .303's. It was a comment on the lethality of the weapon. Also, I remember reading that when it started out, German pilots at first would mistake them as Hurri's and would saddle up on their six to a nasty surprise.

Quote from: Superfly
The rules are simple: Don't be a dick.
Quote from: hitech
It was skuzzy's <----- fault.
Quote from: Pyro
We just witnessed a miracle and I want you to @#$%^& acknowledge it!