2 Country AH

[Ardy123]

The first post you made didn't get the answer TJ expected.  You said no. That doesnt tell him why.   Then you come back with a smart remark.  Very childish sir.

I don't agree with scorpion, but I believe he is a child, I think I read somewhere that he stated he was entering 9th grade.

[ACE]

Omg you just sided with me kinda. 

[beau32]

If HTC wanted to test that theory, they could shut down the all three main servers for "maintenance" and just see how the AvA server goes.    Yes, the plane set would be MUCH more restrictive, but they could open it up and let loose the dogs of war and allow any and all aircraft for both sides.  And then.... BAM!  We know it works or doesnt.     

Something like this happened a few years ago when all the servers went down except the AVA and one other I think. It was spits and Hurri's vs 109's and 190's. I think everyone there had a heck of a time, and it was actually fun for everyone involved.

[cobia38]

 i think we should just have one country    just think of the free for all action  

[Ardy123]

Omg you just sided with me kinda. 

  I agree with your idea... its true

[ACE]

I'm a very blunt person get it blunt

[Messiah]

you've never played team death match have you? yes, timer...tdm's have rounds, and each round has a timer to end the round then tally the scores for each person. 2 sided match ups in the main arenas would end up being much more endless repetitive brawls than what happens now, without goals and little possibility of any victory. you think the hordes are bad now, 2 sided would be worse than furball lake. with 3 sides there are 2 fronts to fight on and 2 enemy populations to deal with.

that enough logic for you cupcake?

Actually, it makes just as little sense as your original post.  Your first person shooter analogy is weak since it really has little in common with Aces High; here let me break down what you were essentially stating:
(1) A and B are similar.
(2) A has a certain characteristic.
Therefore:
(3) B must have that characteristic too.


Saying that having two countries will resort to 'endless repetitive brawls' or that it would be void of goals and possibility of victory is just incorrect and remains to be seen until it can be tested and proven.

[skorpion]

how on gods green earth could my resoning have been a "smart remark"? if your talking about when i said if that reason was good enough for you, that wasnt a retorical question.

i swear all the adults here think that everything a kid posts is no good.

[Krusty]

Way to over-react, people.

No. <-- his answer

What we have now is fine. <-- his reason for that answer.


He answered and gave you the why. Don't rip into him for no reason simply because you don't agree. Like TonyJoey said, don't get into the opinions of what's broken and what isn't, just accept his answer and move on.

[SuperDud]

no. the way we  have it is fine right now.

[gyrene81]

Actually, it makes just as little sense as your original post.  Your first person shooter analogy is weak since it really has little in common with Aces High; here let me break down what you were essentially stating:
(1) A and B are similar.
(2) A has a certain characteristic.
Therefore:
(3) B must have that characteristic too.


Saying that having two countries will resort to 'endless repetitive brawls' or that it would be void of goals and possibility of victory is just incorrect and remains to be seen until it can be tested and proven.

i'm sorry but, how long have you been clueless? i can tell you're not a real thinker, more of a semi-independent drone.

[skorpion]

He answered and gave you the why. Don't rip into him for no reason simply because you don't agree. Like TonyJoey said, don't get into the opinions of what's broken and what isn't, just accept his answer and move on.

not ankle humping, but thx for clearing that up. if i had posted it, they probably would have shoved it off and thought that i was doing damage control.

[Messiah]

i'm sorry but, how long have you been clueless? i can tell you're not a real thinker, more of a semi-independent drone.

An Ad Hominem was about what I was expecting your response to be. Keep proving me right 

[Zoney]

TonyJoey.

The presentation of an idea expressed with correct punctuation, grammer, spelling and proper word usage allows for the idea itself to be thought of without the distractions that improper use affords.

Simplified: By the time I had struggled through reading your suggestion I had already decided not to reply about the subject you chose.  If you have a great idea that is ignorantly articulated, you may expect people to dismiss your idea because of that alone.  People will assume that your idea has diminished value if they think you are ignorant.

Yes, I know this is harsh.

[gyrene81]

Way to over-react, people.

No. <-- his answer

What we have now is fine. <-- his reason for that answer.


He answered and gave you the why. Don't rip into him for no reason simply because you don't agree. Like TonyJoey said, don't get into the opinions of what's broken and what isn't, just accept his answer and move on.

not ankle humping, but thx for clearing that up. if i had posted it, they probably would have shoved it off and thought that i was doing damage control.

obviously both of you missed the obvious...the bolded words were what got their attention

"NO. THE WAY WE HAVE IT IS FINE" what part didnt you understand? thats my reasoning. >snip<

that good enough for you?

that would be construed as "smart alec"...