« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 ... 9   Go Down

Author Topic: Me 410 data  (Read 22373 times)

Offline Megalodon

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2272
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #45 on: November 02, 2011, 04:19:32 PM »








These?
« Last Edit: November 02, 2011, 04:43:06 PM by Megalodon »
Logged
Okay..Add 2 Country's at once, Australia and France next plane update Add ...CAC Boomerang and the Dewoitine D.520

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #46 on: November 02, 2011, 04:26:39 PM »
Nice. I have those as well. I was thinking of this one that you just put up:

http://i836.photobucket.com/albums/zz281/Megalodon2/me410illus-4.jpg

as well as another I think I have with more cross sections.
Logged

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #47 on: November 02, 2011, 09:20:08 PM »
I got these from a website as a source of info for building models. They are clearly scans from a book but I never knew which book. At least credit for the drawings is listed on the pages.

THESE ARE BIG! I left them big to avoid quality loss on resizing them down

Things to note: The bomb door pivot points show how the bomb doors rotate inward.

Specific angles of the radio mast, landing gear, engine angles. Note in the cross-section profiles how the wing trailing edge forms a fillet against the fuselage. Note size and placement of leading edge slots. Note droop of oil cooler flaps.

[/IMG]








(I hope this works, sorry for anybody on dial-up, altogether it's 325kb for the 4 pictures)


EDIT: The forums are down-sizing them. They're really about 1500x2000 or so. I made them links to the full size pictures. Bring them up in new windows for full size. Click on each image as if it were a thumbnail.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2011, 09:23:30 PM by Krusty »
Logged

Offline Ruah

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #48 on: November 03, 2011, 12:04:51 AM »
she is a pretty one!!
Logged

Kommando Nowotny
I/JG 77, 2nd Staffel
Mediterranean Maelstrom
HORRIDO

Offline Volron

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5805
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #49 on: November 03, 2011, 12:17:15 AM »
With all this info, I now drool at what she'll look like when she gets added. :x  Well, I'm drooling more than I was before.... :lol
Logged
Quote from: hitech
Wow I find it hard to believe it has been almost 38 days since our last path. We should have release another 38 versions by now  :bhead
HiTech
Quote from: Pyro
Quote from: Jolly
What on Earth makes you think that i said that sir?!
My guess would be scotch.

Offline ScottyK

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 463
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #50 on: November 03, 2011, 12:43:23 AM »
On the 3rd diagram, i see dive brake listed, is this similar to the P47D40 or more like JU88 or JU87?
Logged
Childhood is over the moment you know your gonna die.  Fight not to Fail, or end up like the others.   In my crate, im the commander.


IGN: Scotty57

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #51 on: November 03, 2011, 01:17:58 AM »
Totally different from any you've seen before, no doubt.

See here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zvkbIJWSRI&feature=player_detailpage#t=212s
Logged

Offline STEELE

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 541
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #52 on: November 03, 2011, 05:30:23 PM »
Looks like with that style dive brakes, trim won't be affected too much when deployed   
Logged
Quote from: Masherbrum on November 18, 2009, 08:32:43 AM
The Kanonenvogel had 6 rounds per pod, this is not even close to being open for debate.

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #53 on: November 03, 2011, 10:38:27 PM »
Quote from: Pyro on November 01, 2011, 09:24:35 PM
Send them to me please.  I can use whatever documentation you have.    :aok


Empty ah say empty yo' email inbox, son, it appears ta be full.

(grins)
Logged
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline Pyro

  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 4020
      • http://www.hitechcreations.com
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #54 on: November 04, 2011, 09:23:37 AM »
Did some emails bounce?
Logged

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #55 on: November 04, 2011, 11:46:28 AM »
I'm wondering about the damage model here:



See the domed cover of the wing spar joint? Outboard of the engine. Hypothetically if you lost a wing tip due to damage, that's where it'd break off (similar in P-38 also, it breaks outboard of the engines).

However, the underwing radiator is outboard of this point! Hypothetically, if you lost your wingtip, would it also mean instant loss of radiator on that wing, even if the radiator was never shot up?

It would make RTBing with missing wingtips very hard! Interesting, but hard!

Thoughts?
Logged

Offline Scherf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #56 on: November 04, 2011, 02:48:12 PM »
Quote from: Pyro on November 04, 2011, 09:23:37 AM
Did some emails bounce?

One did, yes.

Will try it again.
Logged
... missions were to be met by the commitment of alerted swarms of fighters, composed of Me 109's and Fw 190's, that were strategically based to protect industrial installations. The inferior capabilities of these fighters against the Mosquitoes made this a hopeless and uneconomical effort. 1.JD KTB

Offline 10thmd

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1872
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #57 on: November 05, 2011, 01:03:19 AM »
Quote from: Krusty on November 04, 2011, 11:46:28 AM
I'm wondering about the damage model here:

(Image removed from quote.)

See the domed cover of the wing spar joint? Outboard of the engine. Hypothetically if you lost a wing tip due to damage, that's where it'd break off (similar in P-38 also, it breaks outboard of the engines).

However, the underwing radiator is outboard of this point! Hypothetically, if you lost your wingtip, would it also mean instant loss of radiator on that wing, even if the radiator was never shot up?

It would make RTBing with missing wingtips very hard! Interesting, but hard!

Thoughts?


Around 71 looks looks to be the point after the main spar.
Especially since we know HTC doesn't model 2 rads.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2011, 01:06:33 AM by 10thmd »
Logged
- Der Wander Zirkus -
“You can all go to hell; I will go to Texas

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #58 on: November 05, 2011, 01:08:50 AM »
Quote from: 10thmd on November 05, 2011, 01:03:19 AM

Around 71 looks looks to be the point after the main spar.
Especially since we know HTC doesn't model 2 rads.

Say whut?
Logged

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Re: Me 410 data
« Reply #59 on: November 05, 2011, 02:06:11 AM »
The area of the wing near annotation # 71
Just below caption "Traversing angle of remotely controlled guns .. "
Logged
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 ... 9   Go Up
« previous next »