Agreed!
But... but... it's just so weird to think that there might be merit in using CV gunnery in the offensive roll.
I mean really, it's a known fact that no Navy's Command would endorse bringing naval power in close to shore for the purpose of direct fire actions.
Nope. Never.
They wouldn't dare disturb the furball, as described in article VI of the Geneva Convention.
Now I pose this question to you Gents:
If we had the ability to separate our cruisers and destroyers from the task group, would you object to them being parked close to shore, and providing direct fire support to a landing?