Author Topic: 1946  (Read 6442 times)

Offline EVZ

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
Re: 1946
« Reply #45 on: January 08, 2012, 12:34:31 AM »
where do you see "s now"? I said "is now" in the last scentence, but aside from that, I think thats the only place where the letters S and N are next to each other
:rofl
it's a PLURAL dude ... he's adding an S to your -fail-
:angel:
I am my Ideal ! - You may now return to your petty bickering.

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: 1946
« Reply #46 on: January 08, 2012, 12:38:56 AM »
LOL what was the first paragraph?? Confusing, mostly :/

You had said "linguistic fail" in a different thread, and I wanted to preserve the truth and nothing but the truth. So, I tried to add an 's' onto the end, outside of the quote, but it didn't work :(

Also, see:
--basicly=basically
--upto=up to

^ That was your previous post.

The most recent one:
--scentence=sentence
--nessicarily=Necessarily

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: 1946
« Reply #47 on: January 08, 2012, 12:41:09 AM »
He did it weird then. He should have edited the quote, and put a bolded "s" after the "fail".

But even so, hes attempting to point out something that isn't there, and on top of that, hes using that term in an incorrect context.


B-17's, thats spelling-fail, which is completely different from linguistics-fail. Linguistics-fail could be loosely defined as shooting yourself in the foot by screwing up a definition, or failure at an attempt to look clever due to incomplete understanding or grasp of the topic.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2012, 12:47:18 AM by Tank-Ace »
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: 1946
« Reply #48 on: January 08, 2012, 12:44:50 AM »
--hes=he's

I'm on my phone; it displays things wierd.

Offline EVZ

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
Re: 1946
« Reply #49 on: January 08, 2012, 06:41:15 AM »
He did it weird then. He should have edited the quote,
Ohyez, I have noted that some people posting here seem to think that editing quotes is an allowable sin. ???

and put a bolded "s" after the "fail".
SO B-17, I guess you have BOLDLY-failed, where many have gone before ...
:lol


I am my Ideal ! - You may now return to your petty bickering.

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: 1946
« Reply #50 on: January 08, 2012, 07:28:13 AM »
:lol This thread amuses me; let's not stop bickering, shall we??? :D

Offline Seanaldinho

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1363
Re: 1946
« Reply #51 on: January 08, 2012, 12:51:01 PM »
Just to keep the record straight ... My "argument" for the 335 was stated in the original post. - "This plane would add a new dimension to late war and provide some serious competition for the 51s, 262s, and LA7s." Evidently some people find that objectionable.

The moderator LOCKED that topic ... Do you intend to reopen it here?
:huh



No I do not.

51's La-7's and 262's are easily defeated by other planes. Most kills I land are 51's Spit 16's or La's. The plane I fly the most is the Brewster which is a 30 ENY plane. It only takes 3 50 cals and a 30 cal.

Offline EVZ

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
Re: 1946
« Reply #52 on: January 08, 2012, 01:44:19 PM »
51's La-7's and 262's are easily defeated by other planes. Most kills I land are 51's Spit 16's or La's. The plane I fly the most is the Brewster which is a 30 ENY plane. It only takes 3 50 cals and a 30 cal.
Sounds like you have all the idiots and noobs who think they can turn fight a brewster with a 51 covered. An alternative aircraft might be nice for dealing with those who have something that resembles a brain. Aside from the occassional B&Z pass, I prefer an I-16 for brewster busting. (but the KI works well too in LW).
:rock

I am my Ideal ! - You may now return to your petty bickering.

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: 1946
« Reply #53 on: January 08, 2012, 01:50:42 PM »
Oh, but we do have an alternative aircraft for those with a brain. Infact, we have over 100. My personal favorite is the 109E.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline B-17

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2672
Re: 1946
« Reply #54 on: January 08, 2012, 02:00:19 PM »
No I do not.

51's La-7's and 262's are easily defeated by other planes. Most kills I land are 51's Spit 16's or La's. The plane I fly the most is the Brewster which is a 30 ENY plane. It only takes 3 50 cals and a 30 cal.

If they can catch them/vulch them/sneak up on them when they're AFK/spawn-kill them/HO them.

You've also got twice the engines, and about 4 times the power of the average lawnmower we have in-game.

Offline Seanaldinho

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1363
Re: 1946
« Reply #55 on: January 08, 2012, 02:35:29 PM »
Sounds like you have all the idiots and noobs who think they can turn fight a brewster with a 51 covered. An alternative aircraft might be nice for dealing with those who have something that resembles a brain. Aside from the occassional B&Z pass, I prefer an I-16 for brewster busting. (but the KI works well too in LW).
:rock



When I dont fly a brewster I fly a D-11 or a mossie.


Offline Seanaldinho

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1363
Re: 1946
« Reply #56 on: January 08, 2012, 04:24:09 PM »
"This plane would add a new dimension to late war

Just to be clear how does this add a new "dimension"? All it is is a very fast plane with decent guns.

Offline skorpion

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3798
Re: 1946
« Reply #57 on: January 08, 2012, 04:27:18 PM »
Ultimate answer to this thread.

Nothing past WW2 should be in the game.

Offline guncrasher

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17419
Re: 1946
« Reply #58 on: January 08, 2012, 04:33:12 PM »
--hes=he's

I'm on my phone; it displays things wierd.

get on your phone to ah so you can get your account back  :D.


semp
you dont want me to ho, dont point your plane at me.

Offline EVZ

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 540
Re: 1946
« Reply #59 on: January 08, 2012, 04:59:33 PM »
Just to be clear how does this add a new "dimension"? All it is is a very fast plane with decent guns.
I'd suggest you read thru the Do335 thread ... Sorry,  I'm not going to reopen the topic here.
:angel:

I am my Ideal ! - You may now return to your petty bickering.