I wouldn't necessarily say that's invalid, but I would note that it's a VERY limited perspective on the MUCH broader implications of having BOTH PLANES crash in the event of a Mid-Air. Limiting the perspective thus doesn't provide a true picture of the actual event (collision) ... or the process leading to it. Flying against players intentionally attempting to create and escape mid airs yields as much, if not MORE, "Control" over a victim's choices.
I did not state a perspective. I stated what you proposed. If the statement is incorrect, feel free to correct it.
Right now, the "victim" can chose to avoid any attempts to collide. With your proposal, that choice is removed. If you understood how collisions work, you would understand that as well.
You've never heard (seen) ME say that either ... tho you've tried to get me to plenty of times. What you DO HEAR (on a regular basis) are a few brave souls who DARE to post their desire that BOTH PLANES CRASH after a mid air, and are subsequently called names and subjected to personal insults when they decline to be "RE-EDUCATED" ... like good little drones. We've witnessed one such attempt in this thread already ... and a couple of B & Z runs by guys smart enough to get well away from the ensuing insults.
Here is what you said.
Yes ... If my participation results in a collision that causes someone else to crash, I should crash too.
Here is what I said.
I have not heard anyone who would prefer their plane be damaged when they avoid a collision, regardless of what the other player does or does not do, except for you.Stating you want both planes to go down due to collision already happens if both planes collide on their respective front ends. It has always worked like that.
As far as "re-educating" people, you may find people are more willing to support facts, rather than personal opinion. Your proposal is nothing but opinion. Why should it carry any more weight than any other opinion?
I've answered at least several, if not many, questions about the current collision model. I have not answered personal or "loaded" questions intended to provide the asker with a "Selling Point." Unlike at least SOME of the participants in this thread, I am NOT playing a game or keeping "Score."
My question is not about "score". It is not a leading question. It is a question about the topic at hand. A very pertinent question. Your paranoia displays a lack of confidence in the topic which is fine, as long as you are not the one trying to get something changed.
