Author Topic: spitfire mk xiv (14)  (Read 3060 times)

Offline Amsoil21

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 651
spitfire mk xiv (14)
« on: April 18, 2012, 02:12:23 PM »
was it really as bad as it was in this game, yes its fast and rightly so but bloody hell what an animal it is.

what you guys think

Offline Tupac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5056
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2012, 02:24:40 PM »
I think they need to unperk it.
"It was once believed that an infinite number of monkeys, typing on an infinite number of keyboards, would eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare. However, with the advent of Internet messageboards we now know this is not the case."

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2012, 02:47:13 PM »
It was an animal.  More power then the fuselage could really handle, even with the bigger tail surfaces.  They really didnt solve that until the spit 22/24 and Spiteful and even then the only real solution was the counter rotating props.

Flying a 14 was not like flying a 5 or 9 as many veteran Merlin Spit drivers found out when introduced to the Griffon 14
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2012, 03:05:55 PM »
Why does the larger Spitfire Mk XIV airframe with larger surface areas handle ~2000hp worse than the Bf109K-4?
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8632
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2012, 03:18:43 PM »
"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline MachFly

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6296
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2012, 03:40:04 PM »
Based on what I read it was the same as in AH. But it's not bad in AH, just got to know how to fly it.
"Now, if I had to make the choice of one fighter aircraft above all the others...it would be, without any doubt, the world's greatest propeller driven flying machine - the magnificent and immortal Spitfire."
Lt. Col. William R. Dunn
flew Spitfires, Hurricanes, P-51s, P-47s, and F-4s

Offline PR3D4TOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2884
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2012, 03:53:47 PM »
Why does the larger Spitfire Mk XIV airframe with larger surface areas handle ~2000hp worse than the Bf109K-4?

Does it?
No gods or kings. Only Predator.

Offline Amsoil21

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 651
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2012, 05:17:26 PM »
well what i cant work out is that yes the engine chucks out major horses but even when throttled off or low it still moves around like its being pulled with strings away from where you want to go. i mean how can it be so so so much different from the other spits. especially when slow. is it much much heavier?

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2012, 05:27:45 PM »
Does it?
To me, yes, the Bf109K-4 is clearly more docile.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline RTHolmes

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8260
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #9 on: April 18, 2012, 05:34:25 PM »
... how can it be so so so much different from the other spits. especially when slow. is it much much heavier?

the engine is alot heavier, and thats a problem because its stuck right out at the front, so all the extra mass is about as far away from the centre of gravity as it can get.

this increases the pendulum effect (it has a higher polar moment of inertia), same reason that porsche 911s are notorious for wagging their tail. this is why the nose is so much bouncier than the merlin spits.

71 (Eagle) Squadron

What most of us want to do is simply shoot stuff and look good doing it - Chilli

Offline Amsoil21

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 651
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #10 on: April 18, 2012, 05:36:42 PM »
rt holmes  :aok now that makes sence it sure has got a long nose. still amazing how different it is :) i guess ill have to keep flying it for a while and find out how to cope.  :airplane:

Offline FLS

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11621
      • Trainer's Website
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #11 on: April 18, 2012, 06:05:11 PM »
If you are used to flying Spits the 14 is also tough just because it rotates the opposite direction so you tend to roll and turn the "wrong" way.

Offline kilo2

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3445
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #12 on: April 18, 2012, 06:11:34 PM »
Been trying out the 14 a bit and to be honest it feels untouchable.

It does not have any quarks the 152 doesn't and really "feels" similar.
X.O. Kommando Nowotny
FlyKommando.com

"Never abandon the possibility of attack."

Offline icepac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7280
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #13 on: April 18, 2012, 06:18:01 PM »
The XIV models the compromises the manufacturers had to address in order to achieve great speed and altitude.

It's the other planes in game that sometimes ignore the downside of the compromises.

Offline Babalonian

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5817
      • Pigs on the Wing
Re: spitfire mk xiv (14)
« Reply #14 on: April 18, 2012, 06:51:55 PM »
the engine is alot heavier, and thats a problem because its stuck right out at the front, so all the extra mass is about as far away from the centre of gravity as it can get.

this increases the pendulum effect (it has a higher polar moment of inertia), same reason that porsche 911s are notorious for wagging their tail. this is why the nose is so much bouncier than the merlin spits.



Not just the engine alone, correct?

It was an animal.  More power then the fuselage could really handle, even with the bigger tail surfaces.  They really didnt solve that until the spit 22/24 and Spiteful and even then the only real solution was the counter rotating props.

Flying a 14 was not like flying a 5 or 9 as many veteran Merlin Spit drivers found out when introduced to the Griffon 14

Didn't they have to reinforce the airframe around the cowl/nose signifigantly?... like riveted steel beams and plates signifigant?  I've always assumed it's also been inherantly more nose-heavy than other models (even with the upsized tail).
« Last Edit: April 18, 2012, 06:54:30 PM by Babalonian »
-Babalon
"Let's light 'em up and see how they smoke."
POTW IIw Oink! - http://www.PigsOnTheWing.org

Wow, you guys need help.