Author Topic: Me-4210 versus P-61  (Read 4371 times)

Offline mthrockmor

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2649
Me-4210 versus P-61
« on: June 16, 2012, 10:21:39 PM »
I voted for the Me-410 though I am all '2 weeked' out. Should we have them swap it to a P-61? It out excellerates and turns the P-47, awesome firepower. It will own most birds, or so I am going to brag.

Or we could just get the Me-410, or maybe another Storch. haha

Flame on!

Boo
No poor dumb bastard wins a war by dying for his country, he wins by making the other poor, dumb, bastard die for his.
George "Blood n Guts" Patton

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2012, 11:04:10 PM »
The P-61 out accelerated the P-47 in a specific circumstance, and out accelerating a P-47N isn't exactly staggering.  On WEP and at about 100ft it takes the P-47N 27 seconds to go from 150 to 250mph.  It takes the Mosquito Mk VI 25 seconds to do the same.

Also, the P-61A and P-61B, the two that fought in WWII, had a top speed of 366mph.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2012, 05:51:40 AM »
Me-410 was much more significant airplane in WWII than the P-61. It seems that at the time, many were not so impressed with the P-61, especially due to its top speed. The Wikipedia source blames the Brits for painting a comparison with the mosquito in pink colors so they would not have to give up any mosquitoes to the USAAF:

Quote
Colonel Winston Kratz, director of night fighter training in the USAAF, had organised a similar competition earlier. He said of the results "I'm absolutely sure to this day that the British were lying like troopers. I honestly believe the P-61 was not as fast as the Mosquito, which the British needed because by that time it was the one airplane that could get into Berlin and back without getting shot down. I doubt very seriously that the others knew better.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline mbailey

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5677
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2012, 08:06:42 AM »
Id like to see the P61  :aok
Mbailey
80th FS "Headhunters"

Ichi Go Ichi E
Character is like a tree and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.

When the game is over, the Kings and Pawns all go into the same box.

Offline Ruah

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1083
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2012, 12:11:39 PM »
I hope that after the 410 - and the 410 will be what we get - HiTec will be kind enough to look at some early and mid war birds.  Things like the Lagg3 and the Ki43, planes that will never win any open popular vote here where more fantasy power planes are proposed.  the 61 may have seem nice, but I think there is a good reason it was used more as a night fighter, and only used as a daylight raider after there was no air opposition.  To me, all these sorts of planes cannot be truly relevant in the marginal utility choice unless the 'ords issue' is resolved - that is the fighter carrying the 2x1000pound payload.

Kommando Nowotny
I/JG 77, 2nd Staffel
Mediterranean Maelstrom
HORRIDO

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2012, 12:37:15 PM »
Ruah,

Keep in mind that the 410 is a Mid-War bird.  People keep talking about it as though it won the vote because it was a late war monster.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23926
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2012, 12:47:50 PM »
  People keep talking about it as though it won the vote because it was a late war monster.


I'm suspecting many of the voters actually thought that ;)
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2012, 12:48:48 PM »

I'm suspecting many of the voters actually thought that ;)
Probably true.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #8 on: June 17, 2012, 01:01:25 PM »
Who cares? We did better in their ignorance than we would have had they been better informed.


I also wonder if we would be getting the Ju-87G if the 410 hadn't won the vote.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2012, 01:02:40 PM »
I also wonder if we would be getting the Ju-87G if the 410 hadn't won the vote.
I'd be quite surprised if the outcome of the vote had any effect at all beyond its stated purpose.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #10 on: June 17, 2012, 01:05:44 PM »
IDK, Hitech might have said, "we're adding the Mk 103, you guys want to add the Ju-87's BK-37 along with it?".


I'm not saying thats what happened, just that I wouldn't faint with shock if they came out and said the 410 gave the 87-G a jump start.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #11 on: June 17, 2012, 01:16:24 PM »
IDK, Hitech might have said, "we're adding the Mk 103, you guys want to add the Ju-87's BK-37 along with it?".


I'm not saying thats what happened, just that I wouldn't faint with shock if they came out and said the 410 gave the 87-G a jump start.
Doubt it as I don't see a relation.  Adding the BK37 now doesn't save any work over adding it later.

I am glad to see three new guns, MK103, BK37 and BK5, in the next version.

Out of curiosity, is there anything else that used the BK5? (Not the test on the Me262).
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23926
      • Last.FM Profile
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #12 on: June 17, 2012, 01:24:41 PM »
Out of curiosity, is there anything else that used the BK5? (Not the test on the Me262).


There had been a few Ju-88 P-4 carrying the BK-5 for ground attack.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

In November 2025, Lusche will return for a 20th anniversary tour. Get your tickets now!

Offline Tank-Ace

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5298
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #13 on: June 17, 2012, 01:27:34 PM »
Would love to see the Ju-88P series. 4 BK 37's, a BK5, and even a BK-7!.
You started this thread and it was obviously about your want and desire in spite of your use of 'we' and Google.

"Once more unto the breach"

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
Re: Me-4210 versus P-61
« Reply #14 on: June 17, 2012, 01:34:42 PM »
I listed the Ju88P as one I wanted in a Wishlist thread wherein I got savaged by Krusty for false equivalence.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-