Author Topic: 109 vs Spitfire  (Read 8415 times)

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #60 on: August 22, 2012, 06:56:23 PM »
pervert and I tried this match up and if I didn't bring him down within the first few merges, the 109F has a much better engine and can get on top and stay on top in climbing circles.

109E vs Spit1    Spit should win as long as he doesn't stall out badly or do excessive negative G manoeuvres losing energy in the process
109F vs Spit5   109F can win if he flies smart and uses sustained turns over yank and bank
109F vs Spit9    Spit 9  all the way haven't found a 109F pilot that would win in a straight out fight.
109G2 vs Spit9   Spit 9.
109G14 vs Spit8    Spit 8,  the earlier 109 models stand a better chance of exploiting any mistakes.
109K4 vs Spit14    K4 all the way,  Spit 14's handling slow is dodgy.  The 16, 8 and 9 would all lick a 109k4 if he stood and turn fought.  

Hopper and Jo have thrown various 109's around to really make my Spitty work 100% to beat them but the 109 vs spit fight is much closer than some luft cry babies would make out as long as they fly with aggression, purpose and stick time.  

I find the Spit V more of a challenge than the Spit IX or Spit VIII. Primarily because my goal is to drag the fight into the vertical against the Spit V and force a turning contest with the Spit IX and Spit VIII. There's certain characteristics of the 109F that can be exploited against the later Spitfires.

As to the Spitfire XIV, it's not a stall fighter by Spitfire standards. I, along with a very capable and well know player, flew a series of duels, Tempest vs Spit XIV. No matter who flew the Spit, the fight invariably ended up with a 50-50 split of wins vs losses. Primarily due the Tempest having more useful flaps at very low speeds (progressive settings vs all up or all down). The Tempest's 4 cannon also gave it an advantage in a snap shot.

When the 109 flight model was updated several years ago, I flew two hours of duels with one of our Finn pilots. I used the 109F exclusively, he flew many different fighters, from Zeros on up. Ultimately, the 109F won every fight. Why? Because the other fighter had at least one weakness that the 109F could exploit. Now, the 109F has one weakness that can be overcome if you know what to do, and those who don't fly it often will not know about it. In fact, most who fly the 109F never push it hard enough to discover this weakness. It's there and can get you clobbered if you don't know how to avoid it.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2012, 06:59:51 PM by Widewing »
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #61 on: August 22, 2012, 07:07:40 PM »
Manual trim is a 109 pilot's best friend...
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #62 on: August 23, 2012, 12:38:48 AM »
Fight!!  :lol
Aircrafts cars and bikes arent sexy. Girls are.   :old:

There are plenty of aircraft, cars and bikes that are sexier than some girls. 
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #63 on: August 23, 2012, 12:45:55 AM »
True, but my eyes are selective  ;)
AoM
City of ice

Offline Ardy123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3417
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #64 on: August 23, 2012, 12:48:07 AM »
There are plenty of aircraft, cars and bikes that are sexier than some girls.  
I told you to stop trying to pick up women at Rochesters Big-And-Tall  :D
Yeah, that's right, you just got your rear handed to you by a fuggly puppet!
==Army of Muppets==
(Bunnies)

Offline pervert

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3968
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #65 on: August 23, 2012, 09:43:42 AM »
Or maybe because the ones who spent their time with teaching me forgot to show me how awesome the continous circling can be.

I tried showing you once but you threw a childish tantrum and kept jumping out of your plane, then logged :rofl


Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #66 on: August 23, 2012, 09:47:00 AM »
Varietas delectat, Pervert.
And i get bored quickly by the continously repeating stuff  ;)
Im just that kind of person. Sorry. I give you my word that will never happen again, if you know what i mean.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2012, 10:08:00 AM by Debrody »
AoM
City of ice

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15678
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #67 on: August 23, 2012, 11:24:23 AM »
I'm sure I have, but I can't remember ever losing a 1-on-1 in the F to a IX.

(Image removed from quote.)

(Image removed from quote.)

Also, the F out turns the IX.

the charts only tell you so much.   Next time you see me online, I'd love to witness the 109F's abilities first hand!   :salute
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline Krupinski

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2085
      • Twitch
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #68 on: August 23, 2012, 11:31:54 AM »
The 109F does great against the Spit9.. MickyD knows what I'm talking about.

Offline Debrody

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4487
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #69 on: August 23, 2012, 11:37:41 AM »
The 109F does great against the Spit9.. MickyD knows what I'm talking about.
Its more like Krup does great against everyone. Micky is about at my level and i dont have much chance against you.
The Spit has a major raw turn rate advantage while the 109 handles a bit better in the post-stall moves. Its more like who can force his game to the other one.
AoM
City of ice

Offline ACE

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5569
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #70 on: August 23, 2012, 11:50:53 AM »
The 109F does great against the Spit9.. MickyD knows what I'm talking about.
Where you in the spit stalling out all over?
Sixth Tri-Annual Dueling Bracket Champion

The Few

-Spek

Offline Krupinski

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2085
      • Twitch
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #71 on: August 23, 2012, 11:56:04 AM »
Where you in the spit stalling out all over?

I was at first Spit9 vs Spit9... Micky was pwning me so I took a 109F and I was able to give him a challenge.

Offline Bruv119

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15678
      • http://www.thefewsquadron.co.uk
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #72 on: August 23, 2012, 11:58:22 AM »
had the same discussion with m00t years ago he said exactly the same thing.   

Now those fights were closer than I thought they were going to be but guess what the SPIT9 still won   ;)
The Few ***
F.P.H

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #73 on: August 23, 2012, 01:09:03 PM »
But of course that doesn't say they are being used. Therefore I did a silly thing and tried to determine something like an "average fighter top speed". I took USAGE (K+D) and max speed on deck and came up with an average fighter max speed of 342mph in 2005 and 346mph in 2011.
That is a cool factoid, thanks!
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline GScholz

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8910
Re: 109 vs Spitfire
« Reply #74 on: August 23, 2012, 01:31:28 PM »
had the same discussion with m00t years ago he said exactly the same thing.   

Now those fights were closer than I thought they were going to be but guess what the SPIT9 still won   ;)

I'm guessing skill also played a part ;)
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."