Look M.M., it comes down to this..
I don't mind digging the dirt to 'demolish'[ as Widey put it] the P-38 myth..
But the Ww is just so low on the 'best heavy fighter' list..
.. & that it is - is so self-evident - that no more time need be wasted on it ..
Got it , now?
So basically, you can't back up your inane crap, and so you're going to say its not worth your time to avoid looking like an arse. I mean do you really,
honestly think you're fooling anyone?
Because quite frankly, you're transparent as glass, and stupid to boot. Do you even remember that M.M. (because god forbid you take the 5 seconds to type out MiloMorai, instead of using those lazy, careless initials) isn't arguing the Whirlwind is the best heavy fighter? He's just using it as an example to show you that Hawker was by no means first to use a bubble canopy, or 20mm's. You come out saying the whirlwind sucked, and when he merely asks about the problems you attribute to the Whirlwind, you post uncited quotes as evidence, and then say that its Milo's job to do what you should have done about 13 posts back.
Besides that, the last 2 pages have had barely a thing to do with heavy fighters. Instead its just been you spewing your drivel, like hawker being the first to use bubble canopies, and implying that quad 20mm's is somehow innovative, and others trying to talk sense to you.
And before that, it was you trying to argue (and making a
complete hash of that, I might add) over high altitude performance, which is ENTIRELY irrelevant for a JABO aircraft. And before that, it was you wacking off to your inline engines, and calling the radials "fat" and "lazy".
Oh, and I'm curious as to your obsession with initials. What do yours stand for, "jack-arse banana"?
