« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8   Go Down

Author Topic: Update on Update.  (Read 6864 times)

Offline Greebo

  • Skinner Team
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7008
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #60 on: January 11, 2014, 07:21:18 AM »
I'd imagine HTC would be wary of making predictions about future framerates at this early stage. Until they have a working version with all the features implemented, all the debug stuff removed and it has been tested they can't know for sure.

In theory as the new version will implement the currently unused Shader 3.0 feature of the video card this should free up the CPU to either improve framerates or make the game look better at the same framerates.
Logged

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7312
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #61 on: January 11, 2014, 07:25:55 AM »
Well done HTC  :aok
Logged
JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube+Twitch - 20Dolby10

"BE a man and shoot me in the back" - pez

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #62 on: January 11, 2014, 07:48:48 AM »
Quote from: Vortex on January 11, 2014, 12:25:42 AM
However, I do think that B-26 needs to be transitioned to an A-26. Blood Pig'n (most fun in a game ever) must rise again! ;->
Why?  That would be stupid.  You'd get rid of one of the most popular bombers in the game, a mass produced bomber in WWII to add a hardly played a part in WWII perk attack aircraft?

Just add the A-26 and keep the B-26.  What is so hard about that?  Why to people keep suggesting that units we already have be removed at the same time as they request new units?
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7312
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #63 on: January 11, 2014, 07:51:38 AM »
Quote from: Karnak on January 11, 2014, 07:48:48 AM
Why to people keep suggesting that units we already have be removed at the same time as they request new units?

Remove the bonkers Brewster and add the F2A  :D
Logged
JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube+Twitch - 20Dolby10

"BE a man and shoot me in the back" - pez

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #64 on: January 11, 2014, 08:02:38 AM »
Great news!

I'd hope the new plane would be a Pe-2 but I'm guessing it'll be a Beaufighter which certainly isn't a bad choice in itself.
Logged
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline pipz

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4899
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #65 on: January 11, 2014, 08:24:11 AM »
Outstanding!  :aok  :aok
Logged
Silence tells me secretly everything.
                                                                     
Montreal! Free the Pitt Bulls!!!!!

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #66 on: January 11, 2014, 09:24:28 AM »
Quote from: Karnak on January 11, 2014, 07:48:48 AM
Why?  That would be stupid.  You'd get rid of one of the most popular bombers in the game, a mass produced bomber in WWII to add a hardly played a part in WWII perk attack aircraft?

Just add the A-26 and keep the B-26.  What is so hard about that?  Why to people keep suggesting that units we already have be removed at the same time as they request new units?

I think it may partly be because people STILL don't get that the B-26 and A-26 are two entirely different, unrelated aircraft.
Logged
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline --)SF----

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 262
      • Musketeers Squadron
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #67 on: January 11, 2014, 09:32:47 AM »
Quote from: Karnak on January 11, 2014, 07:48:48 AM
Why?  That would be stupid.  You'd get rid of one of the most popular bombers in the game, a mass produced bomber in WWII to add a hardly played a part in WWII perk attack aircraft?

Just add the A-26 and keep the B-26.  What is so hard about that?  Why to people keep suggesting that units we already have be removed at the same time as they request new units?

remove Karnack from the boards and add Midway back,
Logged

Offline 1Canukk

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4830
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #68 on: January 11, 2014, 09:34:40 AM »
 Excellent Looking    :aok
Logged

JG11  Sonderstaffel , Geschwader Kommodore

 The P51 D was made by the Gods for men to fly. 
 The FW190 D  was made by men, for Gods to fly .

Offline Randy1

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4227
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #69 on: January 11, 2014, 09:36:05 AM »
What I like about the move is their commitment to improve AH as quickly as resources allow.  They are making all the right moves to keep me as a subscriber. :aok
Logged

Offline Vortex

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #70 on: January 11, 2014, 09:37:24 AM »
Quote from: Karnak on January 11, 2014, 07:48:48 AM
Why?  That would be stupid.  You'd get rid of one of the most popular bombers in the game, a mass produced bomber in WWII to add a hardly played a part in WWII perk attack aircraft?

Just add the A-26 and keep the B-26.  What is so hard about that?  Why to people keep suggesting that units we already have be removed at the same time as they request new units?

Poor wording on my part. I didn't mean remove one for the other. I meant the development work being done should "transition" to the A26. More=better
Logged
--)-Vortex----
The Musketeers, circa 1990

AH In-Game Handle: Vort

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #71 on: January 11, 2014, 09:46:22 AM »
Quote from: Vortex on January 11, 2014, 09:37:24 AM
Poor wording on my part. I didn't mean remove one for the other. I meant the development work being done should "transition" to the A26. More=better
Can't really agree with you there either.  B-26 was horribly outdated and needed to be redone.

Adding the A-26 would be good too, but it does not obviate the need to update the 2000 and 2001 3D models.
« Last Edit: January 11, 2014, 09:59:21 AM by Karnak »
Logged
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Changeup

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5688
      • Das Muppets
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #72 on: January 11, 2014, 09:55:51 AM »
Quote from: Saxman on January 11, 2014, 09:24:28 AM
I think it may partly be because people STILL don't get that the B-26 and A-26 are two entirely different, unrelated aircraft.

Fascinating
Logged
"Such is the nature of war.  By protecting others, you save yourself."

"Those who are skilled in combat do not become angered.  Those who are skilled at winning do not become afraid.  Thus, the wise win before the fight, while the ignorant fight to win." - Morihei Ueshiba

Online zack1234

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13213
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #73 on: January 11, 2014, 10:00:18 AM »
Sheep sheep sheep sheep where our sheep :cry
Logged
There are no pies stored in this plane overnight

                          
The GFC
Pipz lived in the Wilderness near Ontario

Offline M0nkey_Man

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2254
Re: Update on Update.
« Reply #74 on: January 11, 2014, 10:01:33 AM »
Beautiful  :O
Logged
FlyKommando.com


"Tip of the dull butter knife"
delta07
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8   Go Up
« previous next »