Blech. What's wrong with keeping the old (good) style and tweaking it from time to time? Seems to work just fine for the 911. Ford should try an updated 67 Mustang look, similar to the way the Challenger was done. Nothing wrong with 4 cylinder turbos (it will make almost double the HP that my 1983 Mustang GT 5.0 made from the factory) but they have no business in a Mustang. The V-8 is part of it's personality. If you want a fast turbo motor, buy an STI.
only a moron would use Dolby positioning in a game.
How can "it looks like an Aston Martin" be construed as a bad thing?
+1
Seems like ford is going to kill the mustang once in for all. Not only does it look like a aston martin now but you can get it with a 4 cylinder turbo charged engine as a option. RIP in mustang, RIP.Discuss
Bring back the 50's desgin
This, I have no problem with 4 bangers with turbos running around at 10k RPM. But mustang is a v8 car and should stay one.
(Image removed from quote.)Seems like ford is going to kill the mustang once in for all. Not only does it look like a aston martin now but you can get it with a 4 cylinder turbo charged engine as a option. RIP in mustang, RIP.Ill be sticking to(Image removed from quote.)Discuss
That turbo'd 4 banger is producing more horsepower than the earlier V6 Camaros and Mustangs. 4 banger tech is getting better and better.Not to mention Ford and Aston Martin teamed up for the design of some cars, and Aston Martin was also a subsidiary of Ford.. Do a bit of research and you wont look like a fool when you say "Mustang looks like a Aston Martin wannabe" because it really isn't.If you want a real knock-off car look at the JDM cars and then look at European cars. Some of them are strangely familiar in appearances.
i believe the turbo4 was rated at 305hp. the 5 liter is supposedly gonna be in the 440hp range i think. the car's also a couple hundred pounds lighter.
I don't suppose you'd know about the torque would you?