I've been around long enough to remember the complaints leading up to HT reducing the icon ranges. Lots of complaints from GV guys losing perk tanks to aircraft, icon range should be reduced, etc.
The reasoning was that they felt a pilot shouldn't be able to spot a tank from above a certain altitude. I agree to an extent.......the icon range was 6K at that time, which meant you could ID a GV from around 18K feet above the ground. All in the interest of "realism".
What was left unsaid was that without binoculars, they wouldn't be able to ID plane type and distance either. So the pendulum swung WAY over in favor of the GV crowd. But it was AH2, trees were more sparse, and you could still find GV's if air to ground was your thing.
Now, with AH3 and the additional trees and bushes (very out of scale IMO, but that is another story), the GV's have the ability to hide up on a ridge or hill and snipe fields from beyond icon range. Even in a field gun, oftentimes you cannot see them, only a flash and a tracer arcing towards you. So, again IMO, more balance is needed.
I agree with LilMak, especially points 2, 3, and 4.
GV guys should not be able to ID an enemy plane until he is able to ID them also. I would add that I think once a GV fires, his icon should pop up, for like 60 seconds or so, regardless of whether his engine is running or not, whether he is moving or not. Once you fire, you are a target also. Just my opinion.
GV tracks would be an interesting addition, for realism and gameplay. Dunno how HT could code them in without causing a frame rate hit, but having them only extend a certain distance, like the offline airshow smoke, would be one thought. Say, 400 yards and fading over perhaps 2-3 minutes?
Bustr is working on terrains like crazy, and adding GV friendly features even though he has stated he is not a huge GV fan. Hopefully the open spaces surrounding bases will improve things.
I do wish the base defenses would engage GV's more than they do now. I can remember getting too close to a base and taking fire from WAY out there......now the base defenses seem to ignore GV's and blast away at aircraft 6-10K above the field. Seeing the autoguns trying to hold GV's at bay until a live person can get in a GV or plane and mount a defense would be a welcome change, too.
I can understand the GV guys' frustrations, but only to an extent. But they have had things their way so long, and moves to rebalance things causes some of them to quit? That's just childish and immature.
Offer alternative solutions, try to reach compromises, acknowledge that the person(s) expressing an opposing view just might have a point......but to just threaten to quit? Come on, folks.....get real.