Author Topic: We need 2 sides for low player numbers  (Read 9936 times)

Offline nugetx

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 628
We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« on: August 19, 2018, 07:52:23 AM »
So i'm currently on Arena and there are 50 people, but they are spread all over with 15 one one side 15 on other and 20 on 3rd, even though there are 50 people i'm flying alone.

with 2 sides it would be 25 vs 25 and much better to find a fight.

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17934
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2018, 09:14:59 AM »
More likely 40 vs 10

Offline nrshida

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8594
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2018, 09:21:47 AM »
We are scanning the roster right now!  :noid

"If man were meant to fly, he'd have been given an MS Sidewinder"

Offline AAIK

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 656
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #3 on: August 19, 2018, 09:21:58 AM »
Maybe the opposite direction? 4 sides but smaller maps.

Offline Vraciu

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14141
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #4 on: August 19, 2018, 09:53:11 AM »
More likely 40 vs 10

I think people will balance up.

+1 to OP. 
”KILLER V”
Charter Member of the P-51 Mustang Skin Mafia
- THE DAMNED -
King of the Hill Champ Tour 219 - Win Percentage 100
"1v1 Skyyr might be the best pilot ever to play the game." - Via PM, Name Redacted

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17934
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2018, 10:46:25 AM »
I think people will balance up.

+1 to OP.

LOL!!! nope, not with the side switching rule. Remember rule number one, "Go where the most players are playing", that includes the team thats rolling with the most players.

Offline Vraciu

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14141
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2018, 10:57:39 AM »
LOL!!! nope, not with the side switching rule. Remember rule number one, "Go where the most players are playing", that includes the team thats rolling with the most players.

You have to modify the sideswitch rules for this to work.

We never had this problem in Warbirds.  When things got out of balance people switched to fix it.  Worked fine.

Frankly I don't care either way.  I'd rather be on the outnumbered side of a horde than on the side ignored by the other two teams.   The time for two sides has arrived.  We are whistling past the graveyard in denying this.    When numbers rebound the third side can be re-introduced.
”KILLER V”
Charter Member of the P-51 Mustang Skin Mafia
- THE DAMNED -
King of the Hill Champ Tour 219 - Win Percentage 100
"1v1 Skyyr might be the best pilot ever to play the game." - Via PM, Name Redacted

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17934
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2018, 11:20:49 AM »
You have to modify the sideswitch rules for this to work.

We never had this problem in Warbirds.  When things got out of balance people switched to fix it.  Worked fine.

Frankly I don't care either way.  I'd rather be on the outnumbered side of a horde than on the side ignored by the other two teams.   The time for two sides has arrived.  We are whistling past the graveyard in denying this.    When numbers rebound the third side can be re-introduced.

Ya that just falls under "that was then, this is now" If everything worked like it did "then" we wouldnt be having these issues.  :devil

Offline popeye

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3658
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #8 on: August 19, 2018, 11:26:28 AM »
Given the prevalence of hordes and 2 countries attacking 1 while ignoring each other, it seems that the current player base has little interest in "balance".
KONG

Where is Major Kong?!?

Offline Vraciu

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14141
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #9 on: August 19, 2018, 11:38:26 AM »
Ya that just falls under "that was then, this is now" If everything worked like it did "then" we wouldnt be having these issues.  :devil

Exactly.  Three sides worked THEN.  It doesn't work NOW.    :devil

Given the prevalence of hordes and 2 countries attacking 1 while ignoring each other, it seems that the current player base has little interest in "balance".

Nope, so at least I would be able to find a fight instead of being ignored by the purse swingers on the other side of the map.
”KILLER V”
Charter Member of the P-51 Mustang Skin Mafia
- THE DAMNED -
King of the Hill Champ Tour 219 - Win Percentage 100
"1v1 Skyyr might be the best pilot ever to play the game." - Via PM, Name Redacted

Offline nugetx

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 628
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #10 on: August 19, 2018, 11:39:49 AM »
If there will be 200+ people it can always come back to 3 sides.... but for now it should be 2.

Offline Vraciu

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14141
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #11 on: August 19, 2018, 11:42:53 AM »
If there will be 200+ people it can always come back to 3 sides.... but for now it should be 2.


Agreed.

The war will be a lot more dynamic, too, which is in and of itself fun.

I do miss the fullscreen map we had in WBs though.   You got a much better idea of what was going on than you do when forced to "fold" your map onto a clipboard-sized area.  A  fullscreen map option would be a good move.  Most games have this (even Zombie hunting games have it).


The clipboard is a nice work of coding prowess, but I think it probably confounds noobs a bit.
« Last Edit: August 19, 2018, 11:47:15 AM by Vraciu »
”KILLER V”
Charter Member of the P-51 Mustang Skin Mafia
- THE DAMNED -
King of the Hill Champ Tour 219 - Win Percentage 100
"1v1 Skyyr might be the best pilot ever to play the game." - Via PM, Name Redacted

Offline Zardoz

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 190
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #12 on: August 19, 2018, 01:52:57 PM »
I like 3 sides
Your incessant whining just adds entertainment value to my gaming experience :cool:

Offline Ciaphas

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1955
      • DethKlokDave
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #13 on: August 19, 2018, 06:32:12 PM »
Check this out, there is a two sided war being fought at the moment. One is a blatant front and the other is a silent front (players and performance)

here is a way to deal with them both at the same time:

Remove the third country

  • 1/3 of 3d geometry removed from the rendering engine - better performance
  • force a two sided war, people are more apt to fight if they have numbers with them (don't even start about the three countries have numbers crap)
  • stronger fronts for people to fight over


there is more but I feel the beer gods calling my name.



10.(Jabo)/JG 26 Nuisance Raids Scenario


Offline Vraciu

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 14141
Re: We need 2 sides for low player numbers
« Reply #14 on: August 19, 2018, 07:50:06 PM »
Check this out, there is a two sided war being fought at the moment. One is a blatant front and the other is a silent front (players and performance)

here is a way to deal with them both at the same time:

Remove the third country

  • 1/3 of 3d geometry removed from the rendering engine - better performance
  • force a two sided war, people are more apt to fight if they have numbers with them (don't even start about the three countries have numbers crap)
  • stronger fronts for people to fight over


there is more but I feel the beer gods calling my name.

^^^^ I like this guy.   

+1

”KILLER V”
Charter Member of the P-51 Mustang Skin Mafia
- THE DAMNED -
King of the Hill Champ Tour 219 - Win Percentage 100
"1v1 Skyyr might be the best pilot ever to play the game." - Via PM, Name Redacted