Jan 06

[CptTrips]

I stayed up until 1am PST to watch the election. Trump was 600k votes ahead in PA and 160K votes in MI, among other states. I must have just missed the ballot dump at 4am to put Biden ahead. When I woke up, he was winning. This has NEVER happened in US history like this. We have them on tape bringing suitcases into the room at 4am. We have them on Tape in Atl pulling suitcases out of a table that NO ONE knew about all day.

Hey, tell us about those ChemTrails again.

 

[Busher]

I stayed up until 1am PST to watch the election. Trump was 600k votes ahead in PA and 160K votes in MI, among other states. I must have just missed the ballot dump at 4am to put Biden ahead. When I woke up, he was winning. This has NEVER happened in US history like this. We have them on tape bringing suitcases into the room at 4am. We have them on Tape in Atl pulling suitcases out of a table that NO ONE knew about all day.

Using cartel tactics to steal an election is treason.

If the courts or military don't do anything about this, there will be hell to pay, and it won't be by me, it will be people far more pissed off and desperate than I am. Because let me tell you, there are business owners who have lost everything because of this bioweapon attack, there are military soldiers who have lost everything  from middle eastern wars who are pissed.

We gave Sudan 700,000,000 US dollars on this last bill.

Do you understand how pissed off people are?

Well we sure hear how pissed you are. How's the blood pressure

[CptTrips]

Well we sure hear how pissed you are. How's the blood pressure

Just wait until the Trump indictments start rolling in.

Te heheh he heh eh hee.

[Gman]

Of course they aren't. And I bet they weren't on Obama's side either. Historically speaking I think it's fair to say that Republicans are the pro-military pro-defense type, so naturally, service members are going to support the people who support their spending bills. But to suggest there would be some sort of national coup because a few people you talk to say they don't like Biden is laughable.

As for police, I am on the fence - there is next to no accountability when it comes to many of these cases we hear about, but at the same time, these officers are put in life or death situations daily so split second decisions matter. I wrote a pretty lengthy research paper in college about the use of Body cams. They definitely have their pros and cons. But it always begs the question why many of these incidents they are conveniently turned off.

Can't argue with any of that.

[Gman]

Your name will be forwarded to CSIS.

Hah hah.  Good bless you Milo, pretty good bait on that hook.

[MiloMorai]

We gave Sudan 700,000,000 US dollars on this last bill.

You do know the the Administration put forward that money and other moneys to be included in the 2cd part of the bill. Are you saying that the Orange Clown had not one iota of what was in the 2cd part of the bill.

You would fit in well here DmonSlyr, https://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/index.php?board/7-main-forum/

[MiloMorai]

Hah hah.  Good bless you Milo, pretty good bait on that hook.

On 2cd thought maybe not as the USA has lost the trust of other nations with the Russian hack.

[Gman]

On 2cd thought maybe not as the USA has lost the trust of other nations with the Russian hack.

Again, posting a verbatim quote a former President made, can't be an illegal action in any context.

[LCADolby]

All this prove it and go pound that... there's CCTV evidence of the voting cards being taken from black bags hidden underneath covered tables with no supervision and no impartial adjudicator knowing where they came from.. 

As I said, "When the proof is produced, no one wants to hear it, even though its there in plain sight." Sometimes the proof just isn't good enough on blind eyes, deaf ears and closed minds.

Doesn't matter who those voting cards are for, fact is, they were counted when they shouldn't have been.
Politics is a dirty business, and this passed election was the dirtiest I've ever seen, I hope never to see it again.

[Arlo]

Relax.

[CptTrips]

All this prove it and go pound that... there's CCTV evidence of the voting cards being taken from black bags hidden underneath covered tables with no supervision and no impartial adjudicator knowing where they came from.. 

As I said, "When the proof is produced, no one wants to hear it, even though its there in plain sight." Sometimes the proof just isn't good enough on blind eyes, deaf ears and closed minds.

Doesn't matter who those voting cards are for, fact is, they were counted when they shouldn't have been.
Politics is a dirty business, and this passed election was the dirtiest I've ever seen, I hope never to see it again.

No court has found your evidence compelling.  No court victory, no remedy.

Prove it in federal court, or go pound sand.

[Gman]

Trips, what happens when the highest court refuses to let it be "proved in court", due to fear about the consequences of a verdict that could make one side/group go wild with rioting/etc. From an outside observer, it makes it look like those on the right in the USA feel betrayed by their Supreme Court, as cases that they feel should have been heard by that Supreme Court, were rejected, and not because they weren't valid cases, but again, due to the fear of the consequences of hearing said case.

THAT is also a big problem.

[CptTrips]

Trips, what happens when the highest court refuses to let it be "proved in court", due to fear about the consequences of a verdict that could make one side/group go wild with rioting/etc.

First, that is just a bunch of bs right-wing extremists fantasy daydreaming. 

Second, SC has made plenty of hard calls before.  Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade.  Maybe they just don't find your evidence convincing.

Third, I ask again, how many of the court cases filed by the Presidents legal team, Rudy, et. al, have they under oath claimed the existence of voter fraud?  I think the answer is none.  You say they won't listen to your evidence of voter fraud, but maybe you should stipulate voter fraud occurred in your plea.  Have you thought about why they won't do that? 

Fourth, even if you have totally feel you've been screwed by the courts,  that's tough.  You may think they are right, you may think they are wrong, but we as citizens are obligated to accept the court ruling.  File more cases, lobby for legislative changes to voter laws, but attempt armed rebellion and they'll be machinegunned down in the streets like terrorist dogs.

Do the spoiled brat Trumpkins really think they are the only ones who have ever lost a court case they think they should have won?

Prove your case in court (which means convincing a judge and jury, not just making wild internet claims), or go pound sand.

Or try an armed rebellion and see what you get.

[Busher]

Trips, what happens when the highest court refuses to let it be "proved in court", due to fear about the consequences of a verdict that could make one side/group go wild with rioting/etc. From an outside observer, it makes it look like those on the right in the USA feel betrayed by their Supreme Court, as cases that they feel should have been heard by that Supreme Court, were rejected, and not because they weren't valid cases, but again, due to the fear of the consequences of hearing said case.

THAT is also a big problem.

I am at a complete loss to understand your point. What the F do you think courts do? Sit and make judgements on opinions and beliefs?
If you wish to make a case before the Court (all courts for that matter), you must present actual evidence of wrong doing. The court is not refusing to allow anything to be proven.... nothing has been presented that is provable.

[Arlo]

Trips, what happens when the highest court refuses to let it be "proved in court", due to fear about the consequences of a verdict that could make one side/group go wild with rioting/etc. From an outside observer, it makes it look like those on the right in the USA feel betrayed by their Supreme Court, as cases that they feel should have been heard by that Supreme Court, were rejected, and not because they weren't valid cases, but again, due to the fear of the consequences of hearing said case.

The legal system requires that a viable case be presented. If all that is being put forth is Rudy Giuliani, feelings and spurious complaints then of course it doesn't make the sniff test for even being considered a case. I don't think right wing suicide terrorist bombers are going to impact the normal procedure of law.