You on the other hand are defending people's right to do what ever they want
Here I think we've stumbled upon a point of agreement.
I absolutely, 100%, without qualification or reservation, defend other player's right to do what ever the heck they want in the open sandbox Melee combat arena.
I only recognize these constraints:
1. Abide by the HTC player agreement
2. Don't hack the game
3. Don't intentionally exploit obvious bugs in the software
I was trying to find the actual player agreement text. I suspect 2 and 3 are already included into 1. I know they could get you booted.
That's it. Period. Full stop. I recognize no other constraints other than my whim.
If someone loves egging tanks, even those just involved in tank v tank battles?

Rock on Garth!
If someone wants to drop fighter hangars at a base they have no intention of taking anytime soon?

Rock on Garth!
If 5 guys want to pile on one hapless enemy who got himself in a bad situation?

Rock on Garth!
If I'm that guy that 5 guys are piling on because I got stupid?

Rock on Garth!
If 20 guys want to drop ack and strafe idjits trying to launch from a capped field?

Rock on Garth!
If someone flys by a 1v1 and decides not to join?

Rock on Garth! (Which I usually do for tactical reasons, not ethics. I just reject anyone else telling me which I should have done. I do what I please. )
One of my most amusing moments in AH late one night was following a damaged, smoking bomber down to one crate at treetop alt, staying above and just out of gun range. I let him get within eye sight of the base he was heading toward and then dove and finished him. Why? Because it's fricken Westworld.

He probably thought I was giving him a chivalrous escort. Sauce for the goose.
