Author Topic: Roe Overturned  (Read 21401 times)

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #90 on: June 24, 2022, 07:14:12 PM »
You are trying to reason with someone who has no interest in reason.

And then there are those who have NO interest in facts.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #91 on: June 24, 2022, 07:16:02 PM »
Staking the SC court refers to adding new judges in order to swing the other way. By adding judges I mean adding additional judges. There's no limit to the amount of judges that are on the supreme Court. You can almost bet the Democrats are going to try to do this. Stack in the supreme Court isn't what you think it is.

Trump did his nominee judges which is what any president does when openings occur.

Stacking the court is the act of making sure you have a majority of politically biased judges that will make rulings along party ideology/bias. It need not be accomplished via adding seats. It can be accomplished by refusing to consider the nomination of a candidate through spurious reasoning then flipping said reasoning once a different president of the 'right' flavor is in office. Mitch pulled that one off.

Please don't pretend you didn't know that (or continue to ignore that).  :)

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #92 on: June 24, 2022, 07:16:59 PM »
You are trying to reason with someone who has no interest in reason.

You are making a judgement based on your belief alone.  :aok

Offline knorB

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 858
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #93 on: June 24, 2022, 07:17:15 PM »
see FDR...

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #94 on: June 24, 2022, 07:20:21 PM »
see FDR...

FDR added seats, yes (not a secret). Nobody has since ... but Republicans are scared shirtless over the possibility if they fail to regain a sufficient majority. Never mind that a case for multiple judicial impeachments quite likely exists now.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #95 on: June 24, 2022, 07:27:56 PM »

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #96 on: June 24, 2022, 07:28:26 PM »
The first judiciary act was passed in 1789 when the Supreme Court itself was set up, and it established six as the number of members. In the earliest court structure, the number of justices corresponded to the number of judicial circuits. The Judiciary Act of 1789 established three circuit courts for the new United States, and each circuit would be manned by two Supreme Court judges who would ride the circuit for part of the year, and be based in the then-capital of Philadelphia the rest of the time.

After Thomas Jefferson won the controversial election of 1800, the lame-duck Federalist Congress didn't want him to be able to select a new judicial appointment. They passed a new Judiciary Act, reducing the court to five after the next vacancy. The following year, Congress repealed that Federalist bill and returned the number to six.

Over the next century and a half, as circuits were added without much discussion, so were Supreme Court members. In 1807, the number of circuit courts and justices was set at seven; in 1837, nine; and in 1863, the 10th circuit court was added for California and the number of both circuits and justices became 10.

https://www.thoughtco.com/how-many-supreme-court-justices-are-there-104778

Offline RotBaron

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3543
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #97 on: June 24, 2022, 07:46:34 PM »
Milo you’re obsession with the US is concerning. Where are you from/live?
They're casting their bait over there, see?

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #98 on: June 24, 2022, 07:50:58 PM »
Milo you’re obsession with the US is concerning. Where are you from/live?

From a position that looks down on you.

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #99 on: June 24, 2022, 07:52:23 PM »
Stacking the court is the act of making sure you have a majority of politically biased judges that will make rulings along party ideology/bias. It need not be accomplished via adding seats. It can be accomplished by refusing to consider the nomination of a candidate through spurious reasoning then flipping said reasoning once a different president of the 'right' flavor is in office. Mitch pulled that one off.

Please don't pretend you didn't know that (or continue to ignore that).  :)

As I said, they have selective memories.

Offline RotBaron

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3543
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #100 on: June 24, 2022, 08:00:31 PM »
From a position that looks down on you.

Just as I figured, you refuse to answer. 

As a foreigner who won’t answer that simple question, your demands that anyone here answer your questions are quite laughable. 

Your answer however does spotlight your disdain for the US in general, which obviously comes from jealousy. 
They're casting their bait over there, see?

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #101 on: June 24, 2022, 08:02:55 PM »
Just as I figured, you refuse to answer. 

As a foreigner who won’t answer that simple question, your demands that anyone here answer your questions are quite laughable. 

Your answer however does spotlight your disdain for the US in general, which obviously comes from jealousy.

 :rofl

I did answer your question. Just shows your ignorance of geography.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #102 on: June 24, 2022, 08:05:48 PM »
Just as I figured, you refuse to answer. 

As a foreigner who won’t answer that simple question, your demands that anyone here answer your questions are quite laughable. 

Your answer however does spotlight your disdain for the US in general, which obviously comes from jealousy.

Demands of that nature by U.S. citizens really aren't to be taken more seriously.  :old:

Offline Bopgun

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #103 on: June 24, 2022, 08:09:28 PM »
Blame ruth for being so arrogant as not to exit while 0 was in...

Shes the same kind of piece of poop as O was. More concerned about their legacy than their constituency, and in the end that is all they be remembered as, selfish LOSERS.   

On second thought, I think I leave a hot duece on her grave, that retched woman.
Ingame: StepSis

Stuck in the Washing Machine!

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24759
Re: Roe Overturned
« Reply #104 on: June 24, 2022, 08:12:01 PM »
Shes the same kind of piece of poop as O was. More concerned about their legacy than their constituency, and in the end that is all they be remembered as, selfish LOSERS.   

On second thought, I think I leave a hot duece on her grave, that retched woman.

Make sure you do it during business hours so you can see.