Author Topic: Dreams  (Read 23814 times)

Offline JimmyD3

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4225
Re: Dreams
« Reply #180 on: August 21, 2024, 01:22:22 PM »
scandnvy map ver 0.07, Bishop and Knight bases and spawns set, first draft.
Kenai77
CO Sic Puppies MWK
USAF 1971-76

Offline Dadtallica

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1540
Re: Dreams
« Reply #181 on: August 21, 2024, 05:54:56 PM »
I like the new right side.
Back in 2022 after a loooooong break from 2010. Old name Ratpack, same for the BBS.

Squad I did the most tours with were the Excaliburs then The 172nd Rabid Dogs. Still trying to talk Illigaf, Coola, Oldman22, and Joecrow into coming back instead of being boring old farts!

Offline JimmyD3

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4225
Re: Dreams
« Reply #182 on: December 08, 2024, 02:43:56 PM »
Map for Molsman, Kursk128

Kenai77
CO Sic Puppies MWK
USAF 1971-76

Offline JimmyD3

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4225
Re: Dreams
« Reply #183 on: February 12, 2025, 04:18:21 PM »
dwnundr map

Any suggestions on how to divide this up fairly for 3 coountries?
Kenai77
CO Sic Puppies MWK
USAF 1971-76

Offline LCADolby

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7451
Re: Dreams
« Reply #184 on: February 12, 2025, 04:45:34 PM »
dwnundr map

Any suggestions on how to divide this up fairly for 3 coountries?

Doesn't matter how you divide that, the wildlife is going to be more deadly  :old:
JG5 "Eismeer"
YouTube+Twitch - 20Dolby10

MW148 LW301
"BE a man and shoot me in the back" - pez
"i’m good with just the game" - Animl-AW

Offline JimmyD3

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4225
Re: Dreams
« Reply #185 on: February 13, 2025, 09:58:55 AM »
New Dwnundr at 128 x 128. I think it's to small.

Kenai77
CO Sic Puppies MWK
USAF 1971-76

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4203
      • Aces High Tech Hangar
Re: Dreams
« Reply #186 on: February 13, 2025, 11:14:53 AM »
New Dwnundr at 128 x 128. I think it's to small.

Maybe not.
Define too small?

However, the landmass makes it tighter. Maybe 256?

Dunno, you’re the map wizzards.

Offline nopoop

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3210
Re: Dreams
« Reply #187 on: February 13, 2025, 12:02:37 PM »
Try too small for a change.. We have enough too big...
nopoop

It's ALL about the fight..

Offline JimmyD3

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4225
Re: Dreams
« Reply #188 on: February 15, 2025, 10:40:22 AM »
6 segment map.
Kenai77
CO Sic Puppies MWK
USAF 1971-76

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4203
      • Aces High Tech Hangar
Re: Dreams
« Reply #189 on: February 15, 2025, 12:20:50 PM »

Offline JimmyD3

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4225
Re: Dreams
« Reply #190 on: February 15, 2025, 12:35:14 PM »
No, its 256 x 256.
Kenai77
CO Sic Puppies MWK
USAF 1971-76

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4203
      • Aces High Tech Hangar
Re: Dreams
« Reply #191 on: February 15, 2025, 12:52:27 PM »
No, its 256 x 256.

I guess I should not look at things on phone

Offline The Fugitive

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18208
      • Fugi's Aces Help
Re: Dreams
« Reply #192 on: February 15, 2025, 01:15:05 PM »
6 segment map.

I really like the idea of the 6 segments, double the fronts and Id bet the defense to try to save one of those segments from getting fully captured would be a great battle. Whats Hitech think?

Offline Lazerr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4989
Re: Dreams
« Reply #193 on: February 15, 2025, 03:37:38 PM »
This concept looks interesting.. i like it.

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4203
      • Aces High Tech Hangar
Re: Dreams
« Reply #194 on: February 15, 2025, 04:45:07 PM »
No, its 256 x 256.

I looked at the wrong dang map

Dunno, I might get tared and feathered, but it kinda has a gamey feel.