Author Topic: Revisiting an old topic  (Read 21347 times)

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9705
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2026, 04:59:07 PM »
Guess some people don't understand how weather, clouds, and condensation trails from aircraft engines work.


Or what jet routes are.

- oldman

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7656
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #16 on: January 26, 2026, 05:00:52 PM »
Yus guys and your videos and unleashed imaginations, always seeking a daily conspiracy to juice the blood-flow.

This convo is comical to me.

A true candidate for National Enquirer, if fact it probably made it there.

BTW, we used the green lasers on Mars to cause the winter havoc in those states.
AH Tech Hangar
Windows Gaming Tweaks

Offline Lazerr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2026, 05:48:11 PM »
Guess some people don't understand how weather, clouds, and condensation trails from aircraft engines work.

Yeah I'm guessing the multiple airforce engineers blowing the whistle are pretty stupid.

Im assuming the laws put into effect in Florida are fake...

I've seen enough video and facts from the right type of people to at least make it worth watching and reading stuff about it.

If you turn a blind eye to something like this and totally disregard information provided,.. sheeeeep

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7656
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #18 on: January 26, 2026, 05:56:07 PM »
Yeah I'm guessing the multiple airforce engineers blowing the whistle are pretty stupid.

Im assuming the laws put into effect in Florida are fake...

I've seen enough video and facts from the right type of people to at least make it worth watching and reading stuff about it.

If you turn a blind eye to something like this and totally disregard information provided,.. sheeeeep

Do you know how many "air force engineers" I can find to confirm almost anything I want? Doctor shopping evidence.
You guys show videos all the time of self defined specialist making nut job claims.

The entire weather hacking things is totally politically one-sided. Maybe it's just God frowning on attitudes.

Ya FL may have put the law in place, doesn't mean one bit of it is based on fact, it was feeding the conspiracy base.

Turn a blind eye? Funny how these things with no hardcore evidence make you guys turn a blind eye to what is right in your face that is absolute.

Stepping over a dollar to pick up a dime.


« Last Edit: January 26, 2026, 05:57:47 PM by Animl-AW »
AH Tech Hangar
Windows Gaming Tweaks

Offline Busher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2668
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #19 on: January 26, 2026, 07:25:17 PM »
There is so much interesting science/technology to read and learn about:

Artificial Intelligence & Tech: Generative AI models.

Health & Biology: A novel, stem-cell-derived "pain sponge" is being developed to soak up pain signals before they reach the brain.

Space & Physics: Physicists have observed a quantum spinning effect in a levitating magnet, confirming long-sought gyroscopic magnetic behavior.

I know I am exaggerating but when there are so many fascinating things to learn, do we really want to find a hidden agenda in the fact that internal combustion engines eject water? :confused:
Being male, an accident of birth. Being a man, a matter of age. Being a gentleman, a matter of choice.

Offline Lazerr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #20 on: January 26, 2026, 08:45:48 PM »
There is so much interesting science/technology to read and learn about:

Artificial Intelligence & Tech: Generative AI models.

Health & Biology: A novel, stem-cell-derived "pain sponge" is being developed to soak up pain signals before they reach the brain.

Space & Physics: Physicists have observed a quantum spinning effect in a levitating magnet, confirming long-sought gyroscopic magnetic behavior.

I know I am exaggerating but when there are so many fascinating things to learn, do we really want to find a hidden agenda in the fact that internal combustion engines eject water? :confused:

Clearly they do as you have pointed out previously.. what else is coming out of them at high altitude we dont know about?

Clearly they wouldn't be using something that currently DOES leave vapors behind at altitude..

Might be too obvious if they didn't?  Right?

You seem to have too much faith in what a lot would consider a crooked world order.. Blue or Red.
« Last Edit: January 26, 2026, 08:48:59 PM by Lazerr »

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7656
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #21 on: January 26, 2026, 09:33:14 PM »
At least when I dipped into paranoid hysteria is was too much weed, decades ago.

Much bigger fish to fry
AH Tech Hangar
Windows Gaming Tweaks

Offline Busher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2668
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #22 on: January 26, 2026, 10:20:13 PM »


You seem to have too much faith in what a lot would consider a crooked world order.. Blue or Red.

Evil is obvious enough that it need not be camouflaged.
Being male, an accident of birth. Being a man, a matter of age. Being a gentleman, a matter of choice.

Offline Lazerr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #23 on: January 26, 2026, 10:23:19 PM »
At least when I dipped into paranoid hysteria is was too much weed, decades ago.

Much bigger fish to fry

Or people talking about other video games on this forum..

Doxxing people in an online flight sim community..

The list is long..

Oh wait.. that was pretty recent.

You've demonstrated there still must be a little dope in your system.

Got to see some of your mornic commentary in the MA tonight to.

Got to see some pisspoor flying to match that of the typing here and there.

I feel like I'm seeing a trend...

Offline DmonSlyr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7589
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #24 on: January 27, 2026, 05:40:48 AM »
Its kinda strange to me they try so hard to discredit, provide no real backup for their discrediting claims, and then call you paranoid for asking questions from your observations and research. Isnt that strange. For the longest time, they denied cloud seeding existed, until a cloud seeding CEO got on FOX and discussed what they do. So now that we know cloud seeding is a real thing. Why would they deny other aerosol spraying techniques that may be damaging? Its interesting how hard they chirp against emissions pollution, but don't seem to care at all about contrials hat dont dissipate Iike water does and form skies so thick it blocks the suns light like my last picture.

What I found really interesting is, one day, not a single contrail  in the sky at 30k feet and its perfectly sunny outside. The next, temp doesn't change, but at 30k theres 5 perfectly spread out contrails spreading out in the sky rather than dissapearing behind the jet like normal contrails. Skies at 30k feet dont change that much. The air doesnt change much at that alt. Are we just supposed to assume there was no flights that day? Or that the sky at 30k changed so much day over day that now contrails stay in the air longer?

Why try so hard to discredit?
« Last Edit: January 27, 2026, 05:42:34 AM by DmonSlyr »
The Damned(est. 1988)
-=Army of Muppets=-
2014 & 2018 KoTH ToC Champion

Offline Lazerr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5330
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #25 on: January 27, 2026, 06:45:44 AM »
Its kinda strange to me they try so hard to discredit, provide no real backup for their discrediting claims, and then call you paranoid for asking questions from your observations and research. Isnt that strange. For the longest time, they denied cloud seeding existed, until a cloud seeding CEO got on FOX and discussed what they do. So now that we know cloud seeding is a real thing. Why would they deny other aerosol spraying techniques that may be damaging? Its interesting how hard they chirp against emissions pollution, but don't seem to care at all about contrials hat dont dissipate Iike water does and form skies so thick it blocks the suns light like my last picture.

What I found really interesting is, one day, not a single contrail  in the sky at 30k feet and its perfectly sunny outside. The next, temp doesn't change, but at 30k theres 5 perfectly spread out contrails spreading out in the sky rather than dissapearing behind the jet like normal contrails. Skies at 30k feet dont change that much. The air doesnt change much at that alt. Are we just supposed to assume there was no flights that day? Or that the sky at 30k changed so much day over day that now contrails stay in the air longer?

Why try so hard to discredit?

Any time someone has a thought that doesn't fit this type of persons narrative, it's a natural reaction to rebel, throw insults,, stomp feet and whine like a little baby.  Almost impossible to have any kind of discussion with them, because some how they wrap politics into it.  See above.

Offline Animl-AW

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7656
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #26 on: January 27, 2026, 08:36:14 AM »
HA! Well yall post so much weird stuff ya become hard to take serious, yet here it is in AI. It’s just NOT a viable approach which I think is obvious. Ya can’t dust the entire earth everyday.

Half truth tho.

Dropping aluminum dust or oxide particles in the atmosphere is a theoretical geoengineering concept known as Welsbach seeding, designed to reflect sunlight, reduce greenhouse-induced warming, and cool the Earth by dispersing particles from aircraft. While patented in 1991, this technique is not considered a viable or currently deployed method by experts.

Concept Details: The 1991 Hughes Aircraft patent (US Patent 5003186) proposed dispersing 10 to 100-micron aluminum oxide particles in the stratosphere (7-13 km altitude) to convert infrared radiation and allow it to escape into space.

Purpose: The primary goal is to counteract global warming by creating a reflective layer, often discussed within the broader scope of stratospheric aerosol injection.

Misconceptions: Such theories are often linked to "chemtrail" conspiracy theories, which the U.S. Air Force has dismissed as a hoax based on a 1996 theoretical paper, "Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025," which was a fictional scenario, not a deployed program.

Distinction from Cloud Seeding: Unlike aluminum, common cloud seeding uses silver iodide or dry ice to induce rain, which is a different process used for localized weather modification.

So the concept exist, so does Santa Claus

This took me 4 seconds. Yas don’t fact check before ya soeak. This is Qanon style garbage
« Last Edit: January 27, 2026, 09:01:41 AM by Animl-AW »
AH Tech Hangar
Windows Gaming Tweaks

Offline Eagler

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20438
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #27 on: January 27, 2026, 10:03:48 AM »
Just because a government or its military or law enforcement or.. ***.. says it's true doesn't always mean it is...

Eagler
Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | Pimax Crystal Super | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline DmonSlyr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7589
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #28 on: January 27, 2026, 10:14:46 AM »
Isnt it funny how he takes AI and the Airforces word for it that they know about it but certainly dont do it. Lmao. Yet I posted an Air Force military whistleblower who left the airforce because they were lying over this. And yet he totally write her off. Then I post a picture of darkening Oregon skies with trails and yet that's just "muh Q anon conspiracy theory" lmao. If anything, his post give us a clear indication that they are infact very real.
The Damned(est. 1988)
-=Army of Muppets=-
2014 & 2018 KoTH ToC Champion

Offline Busher

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2668
Re: Revisiting an old topic
« Reply #29 on: January 27, 2026, 10:37:04 AM »
Its kinda strange to me they try so hard to discredit, provide no real backup for their discrediting claims, and then call you paranoid for asking questions from your observations and research. Isnt that strange. For the longest time, they denied cloud seeding existed, until a cloud seeding CEO got on FOX and discussed what they do. So now that we know cloud seeding is a real thing. Why would they deny other aerosol spraying techniques that may be damaging? Its interesting how hard they chirp against emissions pollution, but don't seem to care at all about contrials hat dont dissipate Iike water does and form skies so thick it blocks the suns light like my last picture.

What I found really interesting is, one day, not a single contrail  in the sky at 30k feet and its perfectly sunny outside. The next, temp doesn't change, but at 30k theres 5 perfectly spread out contrails spreading out in the sky rather than dissapearing behind the jet like normal contrails. Skies at 30k feet dont change that much. The air doesnt change much at that alt. Are we just supposed to assume there was no flights that day? Or that the sky at 30k changed so much day over day that now contrails stay in the air longer?

Why try so hard to discredit?

With so much going on I am sorry you choose to see a conspiracy of evil in something as innocuous as water vapor... and what is also interesting is the fact we had this same discussion 2 or 3 years ago.

1: All jets leave a trail of water vapor. If the upper air (30=40K) is relatively dry, the water vapor evaporates quickly and the jet's contrail will be short in length and short in duration - or might not form at all.

2: If the upper air is relatively moist, the contrails will not easily evaporate (actually sublimate since contrails quickly freeze) and can easily extend for hundreds of miles.

3: Upper winds which often exceed 100 knots can spread contrails and create the look of cirrus clouds.]

4: You said "Skies at 30k feet dont change that much. The air doesnt change much at that alt." I have no idea why you would make that definite statement or why you would believe that. It is categorically false. The ride at altitude is usually smooth but can also be dangerously rough. You might see a jet climbing to altitude where it briefly leaves a visible contrail that appears and disappear. That jet likely climbed through a relatively moist layer of upper air.


You said "Why try so hard to discredit?" Discredit what? or who? You?
This phenomenon was observed and proven long before you or I was even born. Maybe you might want to ask yourself how something that has existed since airplanes started to fly high, has only recently (realtively) become the source of such suspicion.
Being male, an accident of birth. Being a man, a matter of age. Being a gentleman, a matter of choice.