Author Topic: Time for another ME flame war!  (Read 1332 times)

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #45 on: April 24, 2002, 08:56:09 PM »
Quote
Israel is a country that had and has to do some dirty buisiness to stay alive.Anyone who looks at what`s going on in the middle east can see that there will never be peace untill one side is completly defeated.

The Palestinians have been completely defeated.

Their country has been occupied for 35 years.

There still isn't peace.

There won't be peace until Israel gives them a deal, their own country.

Israel won't do that because that means no more land to colonize.

Hence, no peace.

Offline ~Caligula~

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 613
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #46 on: April 24, 2002, 09:51:32 PM »
Why should Israel give them any land?
Palestine`s not only Israel or the west bank but Jordan ,Syria and part of Egypt.How come palestinians aren`t demanding land from those countries?
Their desire of having their own country is by far not as strong as their desire of destroying Israel.
That`s just how it is,and that`s why Israel has to beat them over and over again.They just never learn.

Offline weazel

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1471
Neither side wants peace...
« Reply #47 on: April 24, 2002, 11:45:03 PM »
The US should drop H-bombs on both and be finished with it.

Offline ~Caligula~

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 613
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #48 on: April 25, 2002, 12:14:49 AM »
Very nice idea..........next...

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #49 on: April 25, 2002, 01:24:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nashwan

The Palestinians have been completely defeated.

Their country has been occupied for 35 years.

There still isn't peace.

There won't be peace until Israel gives them a deal, their own country.

Israel won't do that because that means no more land to colonize.

Hence, no peace.


If I have time today, I'll go through your big wall of text you posted in this thread. It all depends on how much work there is. Let me just say that
a) there were no Israeli army before the state of Israel was created, and
b) the arabs attacked Israel within 6 hours of the creation of the nation.
I fail to see how it would be possible for Israeli army troops to be "On the offensive" months before the arab attack.

Leaving that aside, as I said, I'll try to find some time to go thorugh all the text you posted today. There are some things you should remember.

There is no, and there never has been any Palestinian country.

Some day there will be peace. By the way things are going right now, I suspect that will only happen after the Israelis decide that enough is enough and empty the west bank of Palestinians one way or the other.

It really is not possible to give the Palestinians a country of their own. Why? Several reasons, most notably:

1. They dont seem to want one, unless they get their rediculous demands met..and that wont happen.

2. Examples of (1) is the status of Jerusalem,  water rights (kinda important in a country mostly filled with sand), the rights of palestinian refugees to return (to what, one might ask) etc etc

3. The security issues. It is not possible to make deals with the arabs, it is not possible to trust the arabs, you simply cannot. These people have their own agenda (no Israel in mid east), and they seem to use any method possible to advance their goals.

Let me give one example:
In 1982 Israel invaded Lebanon after countless attacks across the border by Hezbollah terrorists. These attacks were either random shelling across the border using katyusha rockets, mortars or whathaveyou, OR they used commando-style cross border infintration raids using heavily armed terrorists. These raiders had but one objective, to kill as many Israelis as possible (there is a very well known occation when such a group managed to enter a jewish settlement and slaughtered a number of sleeping Israelis)

Eventually this led to Israel saying enough is enough, they invaded Lebanon, with the objective of removing the PLO from Lebanon, and to create a security buffer in the southern part of Lebanon. After that, there were no more shelling of Israeli villages, and there were no more cross border activity.

So what happens next? Well, time pass, and the Hezbollah and the IDF slug it out with eachother in the buffert zone. There are alot of casualties on both sides. Naturally the pacifist left in europe and the US startyed squeaking and moaning over this (In fact, that seems to be their sole purpose of being, to squeak and moan, be it over election results in Florida or France, Israeli actions, or whatever)

The Hezbollah claimed that the only reason they fought the Israelis was because of the injust and illegal occupation of southern Lebanon. "Leave us alone and we will leave you alone" they said. (The left in Europe and the US supported them naturally...after all, all they wanted was to be free and not-occupied by the Israelis)

SO
The Israelis withdrew from southern Lebanon. And guess what happened next? Yup, the shelling of Israeli villages and towns within reach has started again.

----
You cannot trust these people, there is no way to achieve peace with these people, and they will not stop...ever. They are like Terminator on steroids, and they are ready to do just about anything (be it suicide bombers or other terrorist actions) to achieve their goal...to rid the world of Israel.


----
And (as usual) history is bound to repeat itself. Now the Israelis have crushed the Palestinian infrastructure, and guess what..the suicide bombings have pretty much stopped...Which is kinda weid, because the terrorist organizations should not be dependent on the Palestinian infrastructure in order to function now should they..?

Hmm...gee...I wonder why the terrorist activity has pretty much dissapeared after the Israelis have dismantled the Palestinian "government" and "security" forces.

BUT,
people like yourself are squeaking and moaning again over the poor innocent palestinians who only want a country of their own. And the vicious murderous Israeli thugs who roam the streets of Palestinian cities killing people at random, or just for the heck of it...or whatever...

Soon the US will force Israel to pull back from the Palestinian towns, and soon humanitarian aid will start to flow back into Palestine..and soon the terrorists will start killing Israeli civilians again.

You make me sick.

Offline Dowding (Work)

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 627
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #50 on: April 25, 2002, 02:04:44 AM »
Quote
...people like yourself are squeaking and moaning again...


It seems to me like Nashwan was trying to have a debate, avoiding comments like:

Quote
You make me sick.


It seems you are incapable of doing the same.

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #51 on: April 25, 2002, 02:10:17 AM »
Thanks for that fascinating analysis.

And it seems to be your only addition to the debate too. Well, thanks for trying.

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #52 on: April 25, 2002, 03:48:11 AM »
Quote
You make me sick.

Coming from someone who has stated he would like to kill Arabs, I'll take that as a complement.

Quote
a) there were no Israeli army before the state of Israel was created, and


The Haganah was the de facto Israeli army, before the founding of the state of Israel.

When the IDF proper was formed, it was merely a name change from the Haganah, although Haganah is still part of the name (Tzava Haganah Yisrael)

The Haganah had a strength of approx 45,000 men prior to the ending of the British mandate and the founding of Israel.

Quote
b) the arabs attacked Israel within 6 hours of the creation of the nation.

The IDF have their own website, with a history section.

The first sentence of the first article is
"A unique feature characterizing the first phase of the War of Independence up to May (1948) was the "battle for the roads." "

So for the IDF the war had begun before the Arab armies invaded, before independence.

Tiberias, Haifa, Jaffa and Jerusalem were towns that were in the areas granted to the Palestinians under partitioning. Before Israel declared independence, before any Arab armies invaded, Tiberias, Haifa and Jaffa had been conquered and most of the Arabs driven out, and the Israelis had driven a wedge through Palestinian territory to Jerusalem.

Quote
Some day there will be peace. By the way things are going right now, I suspect that will only happen after the Israelis decide that enough is enough and empty the west bank of Palestinians one way or the other.

Considering your views, I am sure that is a very enjoyable prospect for you.

The problems are too great for it to happen, however.

Firstly, the vast majority of Israelis wouldn't support it. They know there history, and images of people being rounded up and driven off in trucks wouldn't go down well with them.

Secondly, it wouldn't go down well with the rest of the world.
You can't evict 3 million odd people without causing a humanitarian disaster, with many thousands of the old and young dieing, not least from lack of water in the Middle East.

Thirdly, none of the surrounding Arab states would welcome the refugees, any more than the US would conive at ethnic cleansing of Canada by welcoming displaced Canadians.

Quote
It really is not possible to give the Palestinians a country of their own. Why? Several reasons, most notably:

1. They dont seem to want one, unless they get their rediculous demands met..and that wont happen.

The Palestinians rediculous demands presented at the Taba talks were:

96.9% of the territory of the West Bank.
Control of water sources inside their own territory.
Control of their external borders.
Agreement to an international presence to monitor their military.
Control of their own immigration policies.

The only points of contention with the Israelis were:
Israel offered 94% of the West Bank
Israel wanted control of all water sources
Israel wanted control of Palestinian external borders.
Israel wanted several corridors running through Palestinian territory, splitting it up into 3 blocks.

Under the current Iraeli leadership, none of the above would happen. Sharon has stated as recently as Monday that even the most isolated Israeli settlement is as important to him as Tel Aviv, and not to be given up. He has said he will never allow a Palestinian state, only areas of self rule on some matters.

Quote
2. Examples of (1) is the status of Jerusalem, water rights (kinda important in a country mostly filled with sand), the rights of palestinian refugees to return (to what, one might ask) etc etc

The right of return was all but settled, with around 10,000 Palestinians a year allowed to return to their property in Israel, providing Jewish immigration is a larger figure. ie if only 5000 Jews arrive in Israel, less than 5000 Palestinians will be allowed to return that year.

Water rights are the dispute, with Israel wanting to continue their consumption of 250 litres per person per day, and wanting to continue restricting the Palestinians to 50 litres per person per day.

The status of Jerusalem was also agreed upon, with East Jerusalem being the Palestinian capital, West Jerusalem the Israeli capital.

Of course, none of thi remains on the table with Sharon in charge, and if the hisory of the Oslo accords are anything to go by, any agreement would have been renaged upon by a right wing Israeli government.

Quote
3. The security issues. It is not possible to make deals with the arabs, it is not possible to trust the arabs, you simply cannot. These people have their own agenda (no Israel in mid east), and they seem to use any method possible to advance their goals.

Oh I agree, the filthy untermensch.

Quote
The Hezbollah claimed that the only reason they fought the Israelis was because of the injust and illegal occupation of southern Lebanon. "Leave us alone and we will leave you alone" they said. (The left in Europe and the US supported them naturally...after all, all they wanted was to be free and not-occupied by the Israelis)

SO
The Israelis withdrew from southern Lebanon. And guess what happened next? Yup, the shelling of Israeli villages and towns within reach has started again.

Hezbollah are controlled by Syria. The current fiction for the dispute is some farmland, that Israel claims is Syrian territory, Syria and Lebanon claim is Lebanese territory.

Israel occupies the farm land along with the Golan heights, that Syria wants back. Syria is using Hezbollah to attack Israel to keep the issue of the Golan open.

Hezbollah themselves are also motivated by a sense of solidarity with the Palestinians, as can be seen by the fact that cross border attacks often coincide with Israeli attacks on the Palestinians.

Quote
You cannot trust these people, there is no way to achieve peace with these people, and they will not stop...ever. They are like Terminator on steroids, and they are ready to do just about anything (be it suicide bombers or other terrorist actions) to achieve their goal...to rid the world of Israel.

THe same was said of the Sinai. It was vital to the defense of Israel. The Egyptians would just take it back and use it to launch more attacks on Israel.

Irael gave it back, and have had peace with Egypt ever since.

However, follow your racist beliefs to their logical conclusion.

You can't make peace with the Arabs. Israel has to expel the Palestinians to Jordan, and settle the West Bank.

The Palestinains, Hezbollah etc will keep on attacing Israel.

Israel has to occupy parts of Lebanon and Jordan to stop cross border attacks.

Occupation brings a steady death toll amongst Israeli troops doing the occupying. That's why they pulled out of Lebanon.

So Israel can't occupy the countries bordering them, but they can't let any Arabs live on their borders. What's your solution to this little problem?

I know, kill all the Arabs!

Quote
And (as usual) history is bound to repeat itself. Now the Israelis have crushed the Palestinian infrastructure, and guess what..the suicide bombings have pretty much stopped...Which is kinda weid, because the terrorist organizations should not be dependent on the Palestinian infrastructure in order to function now should they..?

Hmm...gee...I wonder why the terrorist activity has pretty much dissapeared after the Israelis have dismantled the Palestinian "government" and "security" forces.


Quote
Soon the US will force Israel to pull back from the Palestinian towns, and soon humanitarian aid will start to flow back into Palestine..and soon the terrorists will start killing Israeli civilians again.

So, rather than the Palestinian infrastructure being destroyed, it sounds more like the suicide bombers have stopped because the Palestinians are still under curfew, liable to be shot if they go outdoors breaking the curfew, can't travel about because Israel has called up 40,000 reservists.

Israel is in a financial crisis caused by the operations in the West Bank. They have just introduced emergency taxes, and are looking at stopping child benifit to Israeli Arabs as one of the cutbacks they can make (Jews of course will still get the benifit)

In other words, Israel can't maintain the clamp down, and as soon as they go, suicide bombings are likely to resume. God knows the Palestinians have even more cause to hate now than they did.

Offline Staga

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5334
      • http://www.nohomersclub.com/
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #53 on: April 25, 2002, 04:18:37 AM »
Nashwan It has been a pleasure to read your posts;

Offline babek-

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 459
      • http://members.tripod.com/KG51EDELWEISS
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #54 on: April 25, 2002, 05:09:13 AM »
100% agree.

Offline Hortlund

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4690
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #55 on: April 25, 2002, 06:03:22 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nashwan

The Palestinians rediculous demands presented at the Taba talks were:

96.9% of the territory of the West Bank.
Control of water sources inside their own territory.
Control of their external borders.
Agreement to an international presence to monitor their military.
Control of their own immigration policies.

The only points of contention with the Israelis were:
Israel offered 94% of the West Bank
Israel wanted control of all water sources
Israel wanted control of Palestinian external borders.
Israel wanted several corridors running through Palestinian territory, splitting it up into 3 blocks.
[/b]

Thats right, the Palestinians said no, they wanted to go for broke, and indeed they lost. Instead of having 94% of the west bank, no control over the water, no control over their borders, no own immigration process, what did they get? Thats right, the secret prize they got for turning the offer down was NOTHING. Now they have absolutely zip. They wanted to play hardball, well they lost and now they are paying the prize for it.

On water rights:
That water has to come from somewhere. If the Israelis would have given up the water rights and handed them to the palestinians Israel would have been forced to import water from Turkey. Now how would the water get from Turkey to Israel I hear you ask? A pipeline THROUGH SYRIA. Yeah…I wonder why the Israelis turned that one down.

On Palestinian control over external borders:
Take a look at a map over Israel. Take a look at the west bank. If you would let the Palestinians have control over the external borders you would effectively open up the entire country. 95% of the populated areas of Israel are within artillery range from the West bank and Lebanon. You would effectively take the IAF out of the equation too, since most of the Israeli military airfields would be within arty range. IT AINT GONNA HAPPEN.

On control of Immigration rights:
Yeah, and what would the first thing to happen be? Jordan, Syria, Lebanon and Egypt emptying their refugee camps reinforcing the Palestinians with millions of new wannabe-martyrs.

On breaking up Palestinian territory with roads:
Look at a map again. Consider where the Palestinian and Israeli settlements are located. Try to form a continuous Palestine territory AND a continuous Israeli territory. Good luck.

Quote

Under the current Iraeli leadership, none of the above would happen. Sharon has stated as recently as Monday that even the most isolated Israeli settlement is as important to him as Tel Aviv, and not to be given up. He has said he will never allow a Palestinian state, only areas of self rule on some matters.
[/b]
Good.
Quote

The right of return was all but settled, with around 10,000 Palestinians a year allowed to return to their property in Israel, providing Jewish immigration is a larger figure. ie if only 5000 Jews arrive in Israel, less than 5000 Palestinians will be allowed to return that year.
[/b]
LOL "all but settled" Where do you get these ideas? Where are the refugees supposed to return? You are aware of the fact that the pals want the refugees to be able to return to their previous homes inside Israel right? The demand is as ridiculous as if some German family who used to live in East-Prussia before the war wanted to return to their old estates, throw out the current owners, and be given the same rights as a Russian citizens. It aint gonna happen.  
Quote

Water rights are the dispute, with Israel wanting to continue their consumption of 250 litres per person per day, and wanting to continue restricting the Palestinians to 50 litres per person per day.
[/b]
Well, the issue is a bit more complicated than that, see above.
Quote

The status of Jerusalem was also agreed upon, with East Jerusalem being the Palestinian capital, West Jerusalem the Israeli capital.
[/b]
Hmm...yes...that would be the agreement that the Palestinians refused to sign then?
Quote

Hezbollah are controlled by Syria. The current fiction for the dispute is some farmland, that Israel claims is Syrian territory, Syria and Lebanon claim is Lebanese territory.

Israel occupies the farm land along with the Golan heights, that Syria wants back. Syria is using Hezbollah to attack Israel to keep the issue of the Golan open.
[/b]
Hezbollah are also funded and equipped by Iran. Dont forget that. And yeah, Syria wants the Golan heights back. Cant imagine why the Israelis wont give it back though…considering how far artillery positioned on those heights will reach (Tel Aviv anyone?)
Quote

Hezbollah themselves are also motivated by a sense of solidarity with the Palestinians, as can be seen by the fact that cross border attacks often coincide with Israeli attacks on the Palestinians.
[/b]
Is that justification in any way in your opinion? "Yes, the are shelling towns and villages, but they are motivated by a sense of solidarity"

Besides, what the F&%¤ do you know about their motivation? You say solidarity, I say hate. Because you have to hate pretty much in order to willfully and intentionally kill civilians.
Quote

THe same was said of the Sinai. It was vital to the defense of Israel. The Egyptians would just take it back and use it to launch more attacks on Israel.

Irael gave it back, and have had peace with Egypt ever since.
[/b]
Perhaps indicating that land is not as holy for Israel as you might want to imply? Israel is more than willing to change land for peace. Problem with the west bank and the Golan heights is that Israel would be changing land for more terrorist attacks instead.

Besides, when the peace deal with Egypt was made, there were no terrorist activity funded and led by Egypt against Israel. Perhaps that might have something to do with things too?
Quote

However, follow your racist beliefs to their logical conclusion.

You can't make peace with the Arabs. Israel has to expel the Palestinians to Jordan, and settle the West Bank.

The Palestinains, Hezbollah etc will keep on attacing Israel.

Israel has to occupy parts of Lebanon and Jordan to stop cross border attacks.

Occupation brings a steady death toll amongst Israeli troops doing the occupying. That's why they pulled out of Lebanon.

So Israel can't occupy the countries bordering them, but they can't let any Arabs live on their borders. What's your solution to this little problem?

I know, kill all the Arabs!
[/b]
There are options you know. One would be to allow the Pals some self governing in some cities and areas. Then you surround these areas with Berlin-wall -like defenses. Easier than just emptying the west bank of palestinians.

There are no cross border attacks from Jordan into Israel. But the safety zone in Lebanon would have to be reoccupied. Here the UN could actually do some good. But we all know that wont happen. Ideal solution would be to have UN troops in that safety zone, but Lebanon and Syria wont allow that…why not? Because they want the Hezbollah to keep killing Israelis "To keep the issue about the Golan heights open"
Quote

So, rather than the Palestinian infrastructure being destroyed, it sounds more like the suicide bombers have stopped because the Palestinians are still under curfew, liable to be shot if they go outdoors breaking the curfew, can't travel about because Israel has called up 40,000 reservists.
[/b]
What are you talking about? There is no "Palestinian curfew". There has been curfews set in various cities and towns at various times, but not a general curfew for Palestinians. Next theory please. And they can travel wherever they want, as long as they arent carrying explosives on them. (And given that they have permits to enter Israel naturally, if they want to go to Israel that is)
Quote

Israel is in a financial crisis caused by the operations in the West Bank. They have just introduced emergency taxes, and are looking at stopping child benifit to Israeli Arabs as one of the cutbacks they can make (Jews of course will still get the benifit)
[/b]
Yeah, I know, and that is bad. But there is a motion in the US congress right now to grant Israel $200 million, so your worries for the Israeli economy is probably exaggerated. They will make it, I'm confident in that. Besides, Im sure they can accept a financial crisis for a while, considering that the suicide bombings have stopped.
Quote

In other words, Israel can't maintain the clamp down, and as soon as they go, suicide bombings are likely to resume. God knows the Palestinians have even more cause to hate now than they did.
[/b]
Im not so sure about that. The Israelis have an ingenious strategy where they are going after the mid and high-level leaders of the PLO and the terrorist organizations. They realized that it is too hard to try to stop the individual bombers, it is better to go after the infrastructure that supplies the bombers with bombs. In this last crackdown on the terrorists, the Israelis managed to capture several high ranking leaders alive. That is a severe blow to the terrorists. The Israelis also managed to get Arafats second in command alive (funny, dont you think that Arafats second in command guy is also the leader of the Al Acqsa brigades…you know, the suicide bombers). The Israelis also have 35 known terrorists held up in Bethlehem. With any luck, all this will lead to a severe blow to the terrorist organizations, and severely hamper their ability to bomb women and small children.

Offline ~Caligula~

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 613
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #56 on: April 25, 2002, 02:03:07 PM »
Hortlund You da man:D

Offline ~Caligula~

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 613
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #57 on: April 25, 2002, 04:07:32 PM »
Quote
A Palestinian fighter's version of the Jenin battle
'Al-Ahram Weekly'


CAIRO - Omar sits restlessly on his chair in the safe-house. He is an "engineer" from Jenin refugee camp: one of the revered bomb-makers from the City of the Bombers. To the Israelis he is the most lethal, and wanted, of terrorists. The poison from the cobra's head.

We meet late last Thursday, hours after he escaped from the camp as Israeli soldiers took control of the area. We are still close enough to Jenin that we can see the constant stream of illumination flares, three launched by the army at a time, that light up the soldiers' dark work in the city below.

But Omar will not be staying here long. He is going to ground deeper in the West Bank before regrouping with his comrades from Jenin.

There may not be too many. Even according to Israeli army sources, at least 100 fighters were killed and hundreds more wounded and captured during the eight days of savage fighting.

Omar will not give his name or age. He is slim, in his mid-20s, with a closely cropped beard. He is a member of Islamic Jihad, but says in Jenin all the factions were loyal to only one cause: liberation or death.

Visible beneath a blue bomber jacket is the tightly bandaged stump of his right arm, the end of which he rubs distractedly.

How did he lose it? During the previous invasion of Jenin by the Israeli army several weeks ago, he says. He was hiding with only his arm visible as he tried to throw a kwa - a home-made pipe bomb - at a tank. Shrapnel from a shell severed it, he says.

But as a bomb-maker, one of the most highly respected positions in the Palestinian resistance, he could equally have lost the arm in less glorious circumstances: in one of the explosions that are a professional hazard of his job.

Omar admits he is one of only a few dozen fighters not to emerge either dead or in plastic handcuffs from the fiercest battle waged by the Palestinians during the Israeli army's invasion of the West Bank.

Of his group of 30 gunmen, only four escaped from the camp on Wednesday, after the Palestinian arsenal ran dry. Most of the others were shot dead.

"Of all the fighters in the West Bank, we were the best prepared," he says.

"We started working on our plan: to trap the invading soldiers and blow them up from the moment the Israeli tanks pulled out of Jenin last month." Omar and other "engineers" made hundreds of explosive devices and carefully chose their locations.

"We had more than 50 houses booby-trapped around the camp. We chose old and empty buildings and the houses of men who were wanted by Israel, because we knew the soldiers would search for them," he said.

"We cut off lengths of mains water pipes and packed them with explosives and nails. Then we placed them about four meters apart throughout the houses - in cupboards, under sinks, in sofas." The fighters hoped to disable the Israeli army's tanks with much more powerful bombs placed inside rubbish bins on the street. More explosives were hidden inside the cars of Jenin's most wanted men.

Connected by wires, the bombs were set off remotely, triggered by the current from a car battery.

According to Omar, everyone in the camp, including the children, knew where the explosives were located so that there was no danger of civilians being injured. It was the one weakness in the plan.

"We were betrayed by the spies among us," he says. The wires to more than a third of the bombs were cut by soldiers accompanied by collaborators. "If it hadn't been for the spies, the soldiers would never have been able to enter the camp. Once they penetrated the camp, it was much harder to defend."

And what about the explosion and ambush last Tuesday which killed 13 soldiers?

"They were lured there," he says. "We all stopped shooting and the women went out to tell the soldiers that we had run out of bullets and were leaving." The women alerted the fighters as the soldiers reached the booby- trapped area.

"When the senior officers realized what had happened, they shouted through megaphones that they wanted an immediate cease-fire. We let them approach to retrieve the men and then opened fire.

"Some of the soldiers were so shocked and frightened that they mistakenly ran towards us." On Wednesday, after the fighters ran out of ammunition, he says, armored vehicles roamed the streets calling out to them in Arabic: "You are finished and can't win against us. We are more powerful than you. Surrender."

He saw one fighter who went down to the street with his hands in the air shot dead by snipers. He chose to flee the camp, although he will not say how.

Using his left arm, Omar shot a revolver during the gun battles.

With a new intensity on his face, he leans forward to ask a question. Do I think the doctors will be able to give him a strong new artificial arm with fingers he can operate. I don't know, I say. Why?

"Because I want to be able to hold a heavy rifle again. That way I can kill more Israeli soldiers. It's that or become a suicide bomber."




no comment...

Offline lord dolf vader

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1528
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #58 on: April 25, 2002, 06:50:36 PM »
same paper different artical. bet you have a comment on this one.






"The US, which has at successive junctures posed as the prime, then sole, sponsor and occasionally a full partner in the Arab Israeli peace process, has single-handedly undermined all its qualifications to serve in such capacities. The only function it retains is as the foremost partner of Israel and, as a consequence, the sole sponsor of the atrocities Israel is perpetrating against the Palestinian people.

Many explanations have been given in the struggle to fathom, or justify, the curious inconsistencies that have given rise to this position. What is certain, however, is that Washington has lost its credibility as a fair and impartial partner or mediator in the intricate process of seeking a settlement to an even more complex conflict.

Common cultural affiliations, ideological outlooks and the existence of a powerful Jewish lobby in the US may help to explain Washington's pro-Israeli bias. However, these factors cannot explain why it is so staunchly and exclusively pro-Israeli as to jeopardise its own interests in the region and its international prestige.

The US's unmitigated support for Israel's aggression and crimes against humanity in Palestine will leave a deep and lasting scar on its image, particularly in the Third World and among the Arabs. The nation that sought to promote itself as the champion of human rights, and invented the concept of humanitarian intervention to defend those rights, appears blind to the humanitarian plight of the Palestinian people. It has done nothing to stop the massacres being perpetrated against the Palestinians in West Bank camps and cities. US Secretary of State Colin Powell, for example, could not be bothered to see for himself the devastation Israeli forces wreaked on Jenin. Instead, he reiterated Sharon's accusations against Arafat and ended his tour by giving the war criminal in Tel Aviv and his occupation army a grace period to cover up evidence of their crimes.

Nor will the world forget that the US threatened to use its veto to prevent a Security Council resolution to send international forces to protect the Palestinian people. Similarly, it brandished its veto to forestall a resolution to send an international investigatory commission to Jenin, forcing the Security Council to adopt, instead, resolution 1405, creating a mere "fact-finding" committee whose remit will extend only to the making of recommendations rather than instigate further actions based on its findings.

There is no doubt who was pulling the strings. Israel made it clear that the resolution was passed only after intense communications with Washington. It further refused to have UN Middle East envoy Terji Roed-Larsen included in the committee because he was audacious enough to announce that Jenin looked as though it had been struck by a natural disaster. The appalled Roed-Larson responded that he could very well understand why Israel objected to his inclusion in the fact-finding team, and that he would present his testimony to the committee.

At least there was one US official who could not conceal his horror. Upon seeing the inhabitants of Jenin searching through the rubble of their demolished homes in order to extricate the corpses buried in mass graves, Assistant Secretary of State William Burns stated that "what we see here is an appalling human tragedy." On the very day that Burns issued this statement, US President Bush declared that Sharon was "a man of peace."

Little wonder that Washington's credibility is at rock bottom. Given its collusion in the atrocities perpetrated against the Palestinians, in violation of all international conventions, how can Washington continue to pose as a defender of human rights, democracy, freedom and justice?

In responding to this situation, it is increasingly obvious that the Arabs must stop appealing to the US to take a more active role in efforts to reach peace, since the closer the US gets involved the more Israel escalates its crimes and the greater the suffering of the Palestinian people. Instead the Arabs, whose foreign ministers will be meeting soon, should bring the Palestinian case in its entirety before the Security Council and demand that that international body assume its full responsibility towards a human tragedy that is the product of a brutal foreign occupation. That the occupying power, in addition to the crimes it commits against innocent civilians, has threatened neighbouring states for merely voicing their sympathies for the victims of its brutality makes this increasingly imperative. This will entail invoking Chapter 7 of the UN Charter, which furnishes the mechanisms to counter what has become a very real threat to international peace and security.

The case that the Arabs will bring before the Security Council rests on a number of resolutions that the Security Council has itself passed. The first is Resolution 181 of 1948, which Israel had to accept as a condition for being admitted to the UN. Under this resolution, the territory comprising historic Palestine was partitioned to create two sovereign states -- Israel and Palestine on 56 and 44 per cent of the land respectively. Since then Israel has expanded into half of the territory allocated to a Palestinian state and then occupied the remaining 22 per cent in June 1967. What the Palestinians today are demanding is only the occupied 22 per cent, or half the land promised to them under the partition resolution. As Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri put it: "The Israelis think that what they have they should keep and what remains should be divided between them and the Palestinians."

Other documents to be placed before the Security Council include a host of resolutions adopted by the General Assembly and the Security Council, calling for Israel's withdrawal from the occupied territories, the right of return for Palestinian refugees and the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with its capital in East Jerusalem. Specifically, I refer to UN General Assembly Resolution 194 pertaining to the return of refugees; UN Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, issued in the wake of the June 1967 and October 1973 wars respectively; and, finally, Security Council resolutions 1397, 1402, 1403 and 1405, all adopted within the past five weeks, and, as a whole, demanding the establishment of a Palestinian state, the withdrawal of occupation forces and the immediate implementation of these resolutions.

The task of the Arab governments, after reminding the Security Council of these resolutions, is to urge it to enforce them. Towards this end they should appeal to the UN to consider invoking Chapter 7 of the UN Charter, which provides for the use of armed force in order to enforce its resolutions.

The Arab governments must be determined not to let Washington's anticipated threat to use its veto prevent them from bringing the Palestinian cause before the Security Council. It has become essential to expose Washington for what it is: a full accomplice in Israel's crimes and the first and foremost impediment to the implementation of the resolutions of international legitimacy. The Arabs must make it clear that the US and Israel are defying the entire world.

The Security Council, for its part, must resolve the Palestinian case by adopting all the necessary resolutions towards ending the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories. In this regard it must treat Israel as a state operating outside international law and in defiance of Security Council resolutions intended to apply the law. It must, therefore, explore, in accordance with Chapter 7, means of enforcing its resolutions.

Simultaneously, the Security Council must assume the urgent task of investigating the crimes committed against the Palestinian people in Jenin and other Palestinian cities and camps. The events that have and continue to take place in Palestine furnish model conditions for compelling the dispatch of an international protection force under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter.

In short, the most immediate needs at present are to provide protection for the defenceless Palestinian people and to mount an investigation into the crimes committed against humanity in the land of Palestine. Initial estimates indicate that more than a thousand Palestinians died in Jenin alone. If this appalling figure is not enough to awaken the American conscience, then the international community must take action to investigate these crimes, the horrors of which will be exposed regardless of attempts to cover up evidence and distort facts. "

Offline ~Caligula~

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 613
Time for another ME flame war!
« Reply #59 on: April 25, 2002, 08:56:50 PM »
Quote
The case that the Arabs will bring before the Security Council rests on a number of resolutions that the Security Council has itself passed. The first is Resolution 181 of 1948, which Israel had to accept as a condition for being admitted to the UN. Under this resolution, the territory comprising historic Palestine was partitioned to create two sovereign states -- Israel and Palestine on 56 and 44 per cent of the land respectively. Since then Israel has expanded into half of the territory allocated to a Palestinian state and then occupied the remaining 22 per cent in June 1967. What the Palestinians today are demanding is only the occupied 22 per cent, or half the land promised to them under the partition resolution.


How come they`re not demanding the other 88% from those "other"countries?
Can`t You see it`s not about wether they`re gonna have a land or not,it`s about pushing Israel off the map.

So the arabs are pissed at the US.Big diddlying deal.What are they gonna do?
If they cared about palestinians they would take care of them in those regugee camps,where they keep them as animals now.
The palestinians are just a tool in the greater arab hands,with the sole porpuse of  destroying Israel.They don`t give a toejam about what happened in Jenin,they just use it for propaganda.
They actually kill more arabs than israel ever will.


Quote
At least there was one US official who could not conceal his horror. Upon seeing the inhabitants of Jenin searching through the rubble of their demolished homes in order to extricate the corpses buried in mass graves, Assistant Secretary of State William Burns stated that "what we see here is an appalling human tragedy." On the very day that Burns issued this statement, US President Bush declared that Sharon was "a man of peace."


So the jews dug mass graves under the palestinian homes,than bulldozed them over it?
Give me a diddlyin` break!!
How can You belive these people?They can`t even make up a decent lie.