Originally posted by -aper-
Grendel
I saw lots of reports from russian pilots who claimed they fought with He-113. It's not a prove that He-113 had ever been built.
P-51A had never been used by VVS.
I'd better believe that FAF pilots fought with LaGG-3's
Well, they were used. As already shown below even when it was first claimed SU never had any.
Also, those gents bloody well know what a Lagg-3 was.
Mr. Karhilas description of the enemy plane also does not fit LaGG-3 at all. A square rudder, straight wing tips, full metal construction which came apart under his cannon and machine gun fire giving him a perfect look and so on. He had time there to make mental notes and has great memory. From the plain description our Kossu thought "that is a P-51" when we chatted once with him, and further speaking only confirmed it. Which Soviet plane had square rudder, straight wing tips, radiator under fuselage, P-51A/B like canopy and was used against Finland in 1944? Most paperwork says that couldn't have been a P-51 - but it was. And Karhila's P-51 shootdowns were not the only ones.
Sorry, you don't know how perfectly all proof points to P-51. The only question is where the P51s exactly came from.
Same with P-38s. We are currently working on interview of mr. Hemmo Leino, who actually encountered P-38s over Karelian isthmus and was 100% definite about his identification. WHERE those came from and why they were dogfighting there, four P-38s versus two FAF Messerchmitts, with mr. Leino trying to climb to attack with wing cannoned 109 G6/R6 - but not having enough climbrate to reach the combat. Very interesting... He didn't have as perfect proof of mr. Karhila, but enough time to watch the combat and speak with his squadmates afterwards.
It is all very interesting

New mysteries to dig into!