Author Topic: My spit14 costs too much thread.  (Read 1438 times)

Offline CMC Airboss

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 705
      • http://www.cutthroats.com
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #45 on: July 25, 2002, 03:54:32 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by AKDejaVu
Why was it perked?  As a pre-emptive LW whining reduction device.

A whine prevention initiative on these boards, perhaps?  Spit14 postings could have surpassed the Chog whines.

MiG

Offline Stickman

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #46 on: July 25, 2002, 04:04:45 PM »
"Try diving in a Spit14 when someone is about to bounce you (esecially if you've just been on autoclimb!). I tell you that its acceleration is much slower than La7, La5, Yaks, N1K2s, 109s (perhaps except E4, F4), Tempest, 190s, etc. I dare say that it dives slower than a Spit9! Of course if you're already doing 320 plus then of course it'll accelerate well but between 160 - 280 it is extremely poor. "



About the only thing a Spitfire could beat in a dive acceleration in WWII was a Zeke. The Spitfire (ALL of them) were piss poor in a dive. Once they got up to speed they could hold a good top speed in the dive, but they were very slow getting there. If you're getting run down in the initial part of the dive, then good, 'cause you should be.


"The only other good thing I find is that it handles extremely well in a high speed dive, i.e. around 500mph."

And that's exactly opposite how it should be. The Spitfire (except the clipped wing version) handled horrible in a dive. The roll became so slow that it could be considered unmaneuverable and at extreme speeds the wings could twist, giving ailerons the opposite control response. The 109's were just as bad (even a tad worse, or at least the control surface stiffness began at a slightly lower speed).

I wonder, how is this modeled in Aces High? Do control surfaces stiffen at high speeds in the 109, Spitfire, Zekes, etc.?

Offline hblair

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4052
      • http://www.cybrtyme.com/personal/hblair/mainpage.htm
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #47 on: July 25, 2002, 04:24:56 PM »
As always, great points karnak.

IMHO all the perk plane values should be given a look, as well as more of the late war planes added to the list. But hey, the new mission based arena may be out soon and we won't have to care about the MA anymore. :)

Offline Montezuma

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 959
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #48 on: July 25, 2002, 04:41:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nifty
I wouldn't mind the F4F-4 and FM2 sharing the F4F tag (FM2 basically is a F4F-8 made by GM instead of Grumman.)  .


Strange thing I noticed about the wildcats is that if you select 'plane type' icons you will see an 'F4F-4' icon for a friendly FM2, but enemies will see 'FM2'.

Offline Saintaw

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6692
      • My blog
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #49 on: July 25, 2002, 04:48:08 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Shiva


Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt, tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt.   :)


only when the catapults are forbiden, they get their potential ? (or something similar) :D

... it's been some 15 years +  :cool:
Saw
Dirty, nasty furriner.

Offline Wlfgng

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5252
      • http://www.nick-tucker.com
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #50 on: July 25, 2002, 04:55:29 PM »
people keep saying how perking should/shouldn't be done because this/that aircraft has such and such performance in RL.

again, the perk system isn't about RL performance but more about game play/balance.

It's more likely that it was perked because so many people wanted to fly it... personally I agree.  I'd hate to see the arena dominated by spit14's.

Offline SKurj

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3630
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #51 on: July 25, 2002, 05:51:41 PM »
Karnak... thrila used the jug as a measuring stick not i +)

He flew it once... and made this thread...

Thanks Wmaker


SKurj

Offline funkedup

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9466
      • http://www.raf303.org/
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #52 on: July 25, 2002, 05:59:40 PM »
Cerberus est canis.

Offline Shiva

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 966
      • http://members.cox.net/srmalloy/
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #53 on: July 25, 2002, 07:33:51 PM »
Quote
only when the catapults are forbiden, they get their potential?


"When catapults are outlawed, only outlaws will have catapults."

Offline Innominate

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2702
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #54 on: July 25, 2002, 07:38:11 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wlfgng

It's more likely that it was perked because so many people wanted to fly it... personally I agree.  I'd hate to see the arena dominated by spit14's.


The perk system should stop the arena from being dominated by the perk planes, but except for the tempest, 262, and c-hog, it goes too far and makes the perk planes next to un-used.

Offline thrila

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3190
      • The Few Squadron
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #55 on: July 25, 2002, 07:43:50 PM »
Skurj, i didn't use the p47 as a measuring stick. the only reason i mentioned the jug was because i got shotdown by one, whatever i got shotdown by i would have moaned about it- it just happened to be a jug.  It could have been anything that shot me down, i would have still made this thread about the spit14 not being worth 60perks.  It was my first spit14 sortie this tour- i don't fly it often because I don't think it's worth it.  This sortie reminded me why i don't fly the spit14.  

P.S. What is it with those mutant smiley's you have, skurj.:p
"Willy's gone and made another,
Something like it's elder brother-
Wing tips rounded, spinner's bigger.
Unbraced tailplane ends it's figure.
One-O-nine F is it's name-
F is for futile, not for fame."

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23048
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #56 on: July 25, 2002, 09:34:13 PM »
akak,

The last time I flew it, I flew it as a E fighter (same as I fly the Mk IX usually).  Blew the tail off of a Bf110G-2 (didn't get the kill as he chose to ride it 25,000ft down and I didn't live that long), but was then attacked by a higher F4U-1D (or F4U-1) that had come into icon range as I begain my dive on the 110.  I didn't see him until after I had killed the 110.  I tried to climb away, but he had too much E on me.  I tried to dive away because turning in a perk plane virtually gaurantees that you'll lose it.  This guy was, unfortunatly for me, willing to burn ammo, not a bad shot and lucky.  He got a few pings, them pilot kill.  Climb rate alone cannot get you out of a bad situation.  You need dive speed and level speed to acomplish that.  Climb alone doesn't work because any higher con that shows up completely negates that escape route.  Speed can be equalized by diving (both aircraft will have roughly the same compression limits) and then leveling.  That means a plane like the Me262 or Tempest always has an out if it maintains any reasonable ammount of altitude below it.

If the P-38 can out turn the Mk XIV there is something very wrong in the FM.  The Spitfire  Mk XIV has much, much lower wingloading and a better power to weight ratio.  To put it bluntly, I don't believe that the P-38 can even come close to sustaining a turn fight with a Mk XIV.

Verm,

Read my long post.  I state that the Spitfire Mk XIV is frequently flown incorrectly, when it is flown.  Which is practically never.  Even with its boosted usage due to people mistakenly taking it instead of a Spitfire Mk IX, it only had 376 kills as of yesterday evening.  Clearly the Spitfire Mk XIV, like the F4U-4, are not worth the price.


Remember, the Spitfire Mk XIV must use its WEP in combat or you might as well have taken a Spitfire Mk IX.  Because it has to use its WEP for fighting to even begin to justify its perk price, very little of the WEP is left when it needs to run.  Without WEP a Spitfire Mk XIV climbs at a good, but not steller, 3,900 feet at its best altitude of 11,000ft.  That altitude is too low to be useable, any Spitfire Mk XIV at that low of an altitude in a combat zone is a dead Spitfire Mk XIV unless it has a great stick in it.  The vast majority of us are not great sticks.  At its more survivable altitude of 20,000ft it has a MIL climb of 2,600ft per minute.  At 20,000ft the Spitfire Mk IX climbs at 2,700ft per min. on MIL and 3,300ft on WEP, the Bf109G-10 at 3,400 and 3,700. the Fw190D-9 at 2,400 and 3,000, the P-38L at 2,800 and 3,300, the P-47D-30 at 2,300 and 3,000 and the P-51D at 2,400 and 2,750.  The Spitfire Mk XIV's climb is not that much better at altitude, and down low where its climb rate is that much better there will be enemies coming in from high enough to completely negate its climb, and all of those enemies will be gunning for it.

For what its worth, I think the Spitfire XIV should absolutely be a perk plane.  I simply think that the perk icon renders it unusable.  As AKIron said, double jeopardy is too much to ask.  The perk planes have to be a reward if the perk system is to work, and with gangbang calling icons they aren't anywhere near a reward.  I can get gangbanged for free anytime I want.  All I have to do is fly my Mosquito into an area where the enemy holds the numbers (I fly Rook, its easy to find those places).  Why should I pay 20-70 of my "reward" points just to ecperience that?

SKurj,

CC.  I misunderstood you.  Sorry.

Without the perk icons, the prices are fine.  With the perk icons, the aircraft are pointless.

hblair,

Thanks.  Unfortunately, I won't even fly the Spitfire Mk XIV in the newly proposed arena.  It will still have the "SPIT14" icon and still call a gangbang onto itself.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #57 on: July 25, 2002, 10:43:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Raubvogel
Would you have made the same decision if the icon had just said "Spit"? Probably not. That's my point.


Actually, yes. A Spit above a Mustang... probably ANY cannon armed spit anyway... is a serious threat. They dive well, turn just fine and the guns will "do" you in short order.

In fact, now that I think about it.. I really don't like having much of anything above a Mustang. ;)

After all, the Mustang has basically one asset. It's reasonably fast. Not the fastest.. there are lots of other aircraft out there now that can run one down. The rest of the capabilities are essentially "average" for the MA planeset.

So, yeah.. if your plane had just said "Spit" we'd have still tried to deal with you first.

:)
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Urchin

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5517
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #58 on: July 26, 2002, 12:08:34 AM »
I don't think the "gangbang me' icon has everything to do with it.  Sure, it does have something to do with it (flew one tonight defending a carrier- I had at one point a Spitfire, an La7, and a, get this.. TBM trying to get me).  

Of course, I've had far more than 3 guys on me at any one time in such 'un-gangbang iconed' planes like the 109F4, 190A5, A6M2,etc.  People follow the path of least resistance, remember.  It is probably easier for the 'average' player to kill an enemy with 3 friendlies 'helping' (or competing) than it is for them to kill an enemy alone.  The only thing that can get you out of a gangbang is acceleration (foremost) and top speed (just about as important).  The Spit 14 has one, but not the other.  It is in about the same shows the 109G10 is in, it is almost fast enough to get away, but not quite.  

The Spit 14s 'gangbang' icon just makes it worse though, since people tend to start drooling when they see one.  I would agree that it isn't worth 60 points, or however many it is.  Of course, I very rarely fly perk planes, so I have a freaking horde of perk points built up.  I will say that I don't see the point of putting planes in the game if the average player hardly ever gets to use them though.

Offline akak

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 986
      • http://www.479thraiders.com
My spit14 costs too much thread.
« Reply #59 on: July 26, 2002, 12:48:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
akak,



If the P-38 can out turn the Mk XIV there is something very wrong in the FM.  The Spitfire  Mk XIV has much, much lower wingloading and a better power to weight ratio.  To put it bluntly, I don't believe that the P-38 can even come close to sustaining a turn fight with a Mk XIV.




Here's another film where I turn with another Spitfire XIV in the P-38, only my crappy aim allowed the fight to last as long as it did.

As for someone saying it had poor dive performance and accelertion, there is a point in the fight were the Spitfire XIV tried to make a break for it and dives to the deck.  In his dive, he clearly out dives my P-38L and then when he reaches the deck, accelerates away.  It's only when he reverses and tried again to enter into a turn fight that I'm able to get him.  A definite example of how not to fly the Spitfire XIV, had the pilot used Energy fighting tactics instead of trying to get an angle, out come would have been different.

Someone else posted earlier that it shouldn't be flown like a normal Spitfire and they're right.

P-38L vs. Spitfire Mk XIV Part 2



Ack-Ack
479th FG - Riddle's Raiders