Well, from your previous postings I already understood that you aren't exactly the brightest of lights. more of a broken bulb to be honest and therefore I'll try to explain...again.
I wrote 'unprecedented' and that single word sparked of another incoherent ranting speech from you. Let's say you put aside your emotional ties to certain events that came up in this discussion and about which you obviously feel very strongly and look at the facts. For example, regarding scale the most 'significant': the Turkish genocide, the more reliable estimates vary between just below one till about 1,5 million casualties including those slain before the seizure of power in 1908 and in the 90's of the 19th century. Hardly comparable to the approx. 55 million of WWII, eh?
And if you should decide to do something entirely new, live an experience you've never had, you could go to the local library and apply for membership. Then you could borrow an English dictionary and look up the meaning of 'unprecedented scale', then you would notice that, combining what I wrote up here and what I cited below, you were not reading properly, let alone making any sense in the reply.
You stated:" Unprecedented scale by your Left-wing Euro-centered education. You must be referring to WWI maybe? or WWII ?? Hitler was not the first to perpetrate genocide my friend. He was just the most efficient. The Turks murdered millions of Greeks and Armenians in the late 19th early 20th century. God-they still are finding skulls in Turkey today...millions and millions. Did this count in your Unprecedented scale."
Taking the numerical difference between 55 and 1,5 mil into account, the former was indeed a genocide on an unprecedented scale because regarding the scale it was unprecedented, i.e. never preceded by an equivalent. Now you understand what unprecedented scale means?
As for your moving plea for my forefathers who defended Europe against the Muslims, in those times Europe was a retarded, barbaric society compared to the Eastern and Arabian worlds. Both in the scienctific and social sense. And those 'thugs' who invaded us were the same who defended their homes from other thugs who held crusades to take their land, or were the pillaging and murdering crusaders any better than the Turks doing the same? Even someone as biased and narrow-minded as yourself should recognize that there are always two sides to a story and the truth is inevitably in or near the middle.
BTW, 'Left-wing' in your first sentence, you sure keep the money coming. LOL, Simpleton