Author Topic: how about the Helldiver?  (Read 544 times)

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
how about the Helldiver?
« Reply #15 on: October 31, 2002, 03:51:07 PM »
Wear and tear.

Offline udet

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2242
      • http://www.angelfire.com/nd/mihaipruna/dogfight.html
how about the Helldiver?
« Reply #16 on: October 31, 2002, 06:04:00 PM »
Hey, I started this thread and it is about the Helldiver. So forget about some rice eating Jap flying mousetrap and gimme some input on whether you want the Helldiver in AH or not.

Offline J_A_B

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3012
how about the Helldiver?
« Reply #17 on: October 31, 2002, 06:21:14 PM »
The Helldiver is armed with 2 Hispanos in the nose...imagine the HO whines!  

Of course, HO is about all it could do :)   But for MA purposes it'd be a decent choice and would probably see some use in fleet battles, particularly the ones where the fleet gets parked only a few limes offshore  It carries about as much ordnance as any of the Navy fighters and could strafe better than any of the CV planes except the perked F4U-1C.  Being a bomber-type plane I imagine it'd also be marginally more survivable in MA base-attack missions.  It'd certainly see more use than the TBM  :)


The "rice-eating mousetrap" would also be a good choice, better able to protect itself against enemy fighters but it wouldn't carry as much ordnance.


J_A_B

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
how about the Helldiver?
« Reply #18 on: October 31, 2002, 09:03:14 PM »
No ty, the Helldiver was huge pos in real life and the Navy hated it thats why it is called "The Beast" . The Grace on the other hand was a superlative plane, handeling comparable to the Zero, great speed and preformance for it's type, and a very usable load, very rugaed construction, good defensive aramement and two Type 99 MK II cannons firing forward( same guns as the N1K2-J). The US plane set is laughafably devaloped compared to the other countryes in AH espichaly the Japanes, Russians and Italians.

Offline J_A_B

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3012
how about the Helldiver?
« Reply #19 on: October 31, 2002, 09:15:52 PM »
Well this thread was about the Helldiver and he asked for support :)



Otherwise I agree with you.  

J_A_B

Offline brady

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7055
      • http://personal.jax.bellsouth.net/jax/t/y/tyr88/JG2main.html
how about the Helldiver?
« Reply #20 on: October 31, 2002, 10:26:19 PM »
Well... I feal his pain I know all about wanting a plane and secreatly knowing it more than likely will never come to throughition. But Don't give up hope m8t Your dream plane is US and HTC likes to model US planes:)

Offline udet

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2242
      • http://www.angelfire.com/nd/mihaipruna/dogfight.html
how about the Helldiver?
« Reply #21 on: November 01, 2002, 12:07:50 PM »
there's nothing wrong with that. It's easier to find info on US or British planes, therefore they will be modelled more realistically.

Offline Nifty

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4400
how about the Helldiver?
« Reply #22 on: November 01, 2002, 01:39:43 PM »
Not any time soon.  The plane was not reliable and the pilots of the time preferred the plane we've already got, the Dauntless.

The Helldiver could be added later on after much of the glaring holes in the planeset are patched.
proud member of the 332nd Flying Mongrels, noses in the wind since 1997.