lazs2: Ok... factor intelegence. I haven't seen those figures but it would have to come up with some kind of profile like... "people with x IQ or lower and X yearly income have X amount of homicides per 100,000 regardless of race. I don't think that will do it...
They will in almost all income/intelligence groups.
The situation will be somewhat worse at the bottom - but mostly due to effects of concentration. That would be cultural circumstance - not an indication of ingerent "evilness".
100 dumb people living in a community of 1000 regular people would be much less likely to get into trouble than the same 100 dumb people living alone like it happens in inner-city gettoes.
how do you regulate intelegence?
What do you mean by regulate? You can screw it up by wrong nutrition or using drugs/alcohol during pregnancy.
There are no methods of raising it by a measurable amount - whatever the expence. Some methods (Head Start) add 6-10 IQ points to young children but by the age of 17 the difference between them and a control group goes away, so they actually accelerate it rather than add to it.
What you can do is create an environment where dumb people are less likely to cause problems and create jobs they can perform, etc.
BTW, while most of the antisocial people are dumb, only a minor fraction of dumb people are anti-social. That is very important to remember.
Just because over 50% of criminals are black, only a very small fraction of black are criminals.
Do you think that Blacks have NOT been marginalized by discrimination?
Sure they were. That does not mean that the discrepancies we see today are mostlythe result of discrimination that ended two generations ago. There are studies that allow to isolate the effects - good studies done by conciensious people. Not just in US. Not just in places where blacks are minority or are not represented, etc.
So either you are trolling, or I was wrong in my assessment of you.
Unfortunately I am not trolling. You are welcome to examine the same studies/information I did and find flaws in them. I would be only to happy to learn that the problem is solvable. I have no desire for my children to live in a racially-torn world. I do not believe it would be good for them even if theyw ere guaranteed the role of "oppressors" - let alone victims.
I've done a lot of homework on that topic. I tried to bring extensive descriptions of the studies and results but never got an argument on the vurtues of the data presented - just got called names. So I leave it to the people to read the books/articles. I could give you the references if you have trouble finding them - which is highly unlikely. Whether you agree with my point now or not, it would never hurt to know the arguments of the opposing side. You would have to spend time though - few thousand pages worth.
If you list a specific example how a study can be skewed, I would be happy to examine it. So far I can see one clear statement:
midnight Target: IQ tests are racially biased too.
Not the ones I am referring too. You do not try to discredit physics based on incorrect theories that physicists believed 150 years ago.
Care to name a kind of study that could was/have been done over the last 50 years and how it could have been biased and I will respond.
The link you've provided is not that convincing. The author does not use any numbers - just makes a hypothetical point and discards the whole issue. Yes, there may be racial bias - but in may be eliminated. Was it? Yes, the drug-posession may be more skewed. But by how much? Were the results used in the studies he mentions without such adjustments? Where are the references?
What about murders ? Murder Victims - hard to skewed race statistics of a murder victim, isnt'it? Children out of wedlock?
The degradation of the family through poor male role modeling.
And you think those can be unrelated to intelligence?
Animal: I would love to see miko, lazs and some others have a discussion with some professors I have met.
Since it is not likely, would you care to direct us to any books or articles those esteemed fellows produced on the relavant subject? Barring that, would you ask them what reading they would recommend?
The guys I've read were quite accomplished academicians too.
H. Godwineson: The great majority of African-Americans in the U.S. have, throughout our history, been poor.
Lack of equality and social mobility kept capable blacks living among less capable ones. Also, there were no corrupting government handouts. Once that situation got corrected, capable blacks left.
Black American social ills are mostly a result of the Great Society. In 1965 black illegitimacy rates were 25%. Now they are 70%.
But white's are "only" 36% - how come such a discrepancy? So it can't be just welfare.
miko