Turkey hasn't asked NATO for assistance, so I don't see why we should need to send help until they ask for it.
Hans Blix makes his latest (and probably final) report on Friday, and there will be a security council vote - wouldn't it make sense to wait until then before passing judgement on French/German intentions? Afterall, it is how they vote that counts, not all this posturing beforehand.
The French have always been tricky customers when it comes to international relations with the US. I don't think this time things are any different, but there will be no veto. No big deal. Germany, for obvious reasons, is staunchly anti-war. Until the Balkan crisis, they hadn't deployed troops outside their border for 50 odd years. It's embedded in the German national character to avoid conflict at all costs - and to be honest I can largely understand that given 20th century history.
Personally, I believe the whole casus belli for this conflict has been confused and changed from either WMD to terrorism so many times, with the US/UK grasping at anything that might support their case that I'm very skeptical about anything they say.
I still don't understand why intelligence about possible weapons sites was not passed onto the inspectors as soon as they went in.
On the other hand, I don't doubt that Saddam has chemical and possibly biological weapons and needs to be confronted. But I also believe that to hold the view that oil has nothing to do with this course of action is patently ridiculous. It may not be the sole reason, but it is a reason. I think the US perhaps views Iraqi oil as an insurance policy against a deterioration in Saudi-US relations or the overthrow of the Saudi government by Islamic extremists.
A post-Saddam Iraq might be a great democratic Western ally if handled right. They have a well educated, technological middle class and are not religiously indoctrinated. I don't believe the 'the only good iraqi is a dead iraqi' crap some people post on this board. But you can lead horse to water, but the horse has to want to drink. Unless a well planned, funded and supported plan is in place in Iraq, we could be creating huge problems for ourselves.
I'd like to see more effort in the middle Eastern peace process. I see the continuing Israeli-Palestinian problems as the biggest recruitment advertisement for Islamic terrorists in the world today. Without an end to it, the militants (on both sides) will always have the popular support they need to continue the blood-bath.
Overall, the 'war on terrorism' cannot be fought with smart bombs, no matter how smart they might be.