Anti-Americans Clue Me In Please

[Toad]

"No people will tamely surrender their Liberties, nor can any be easily subdued, when knowledge is diffusd and Virtue is preservd. On the Contrary, when People are universally ignorant, and debauchd in their Manners, they will sink under their own weight without the Aid of foreign Invaders."
Samuel Adams, letter to James Warren, 1775

Well, half of that is already there, fer sure.

[Eagler]

we don't need to drop bombs, just hi speed modems/computers, Xboxs, coca cola, McD's & playboys - tell the 15 to 25 crowd theres more where that came from when you get rid of the guy with the bighead and mustache - wha-la problem solved

imagine how many Xboxs you could drop for each cruise missisle? hell, throw in a 25" sony to boot ....

[Siaf__csf]

Posted by Toad:

But, of course, Hussein or Bin Laden killing innocent civilians doesn't concern you in the least.

It's no different to Bush or Rumsfelt killing innocent civillians, is it? By taking into the act you lower yourselves to the level of the terrorists. That's mighty sad.

[blitz]

Originally posted by funkedup
How can you condemn past US governments for helping to empower butchers like Bin Laden and Hussein while you simultaneously condemn the current US government for trying to take down Bin Laden and Hussein?  You need to pick one.

We don't condemn US for tryin to take down them.

It's the way and the words Bush & his warmongers choose that some people strongly dislike.
We simply don't want a single nation puts itself in the position of the worlds cop.


Regards Blitz



America is threatened by Iraq in no way, it's just plain redicoulous

[lazs2]

miko... you prove my point... the people of iraq are living under someone every bit as bad as stalin at his worst... by your own logic and statements.... we should invade and any people would be willing to take a chance on the "devestation".   If you claim that the only reason not to invade the soviet union was that ..... stalin died?   sheesh.... how many people died or, more accurately, lived their whole lives under that despot?   how many will live/have lived their entire lives under the sadman?  

 What comfort would you offer?   "don't worry..... these regiems tend to go go away on their own...... eventually.."
lazs

[StSanta]

Heh trashing generates trashing.

You'll notice that most posts are opposing the war, not the US.

OTOH the Eurowussies direct insults to nations comments are worse.

[Toad]

Originally posted by Siaf__csf
Posted by Toad:
 

It's no different to Bush or Rumsfelt killing innocent civillians, is it? By taking into the act you lower yourselves to the level of the terrorists. That's mighty sad.

Yes, it is extremely different. It's completely different. It's not the same at all.

If you can't see the difference, I feel sorry for you because you are a "mighty sad" excuse for an intellect.

Now, I could enumerate some differences, but it'll mean more to you if you reflect on it and come up with a few yourself.

Toodle-pip.

[Toad]

Originally posted by blitz
We don't condemn US for tryin to take down them.

It's the way and the words Bush & his warmongers choose that some people strongly dislike.
We simply don't want a single nation puts itself in the position of the worlds cop.


Regards Blitz



America is threatened by Iraq in no way, it's just plain redicoulous

Now THAT'S funny! Is this your girlfriend speaking for you?

You don't like the way Bush TALKS about this? That's your big problem?

You don't like the WAY he's going to do it? That's your big problem? (I suppose you have a better strategic and tactical plan for the employment of military force to remove Hussein?)

You don't want the US to be the world's cop? OUT-FORKING-STANDING! Guess what? We're tired of doing it! What serendipity!


Problem is...... NONE of yas have a military that's capable of even whipping Iraq....... and that won't take much....... let alone an outfit like North Korea which WILL take much.

So, let us know when you actually hire a policeman or two.

(But maybe Rumsfeld will have all our troops home before you get that done... in fact, I'm SURE that will happen because you guys will NEVER hire.   )

[Monk]

Wohooo....easy, Toad;)
I think its called "envy" in German.

[sling322]

We simply don't want a single nation puts itself in the position of the worlds cop.

Sorry to break this to you Blitz....but the US has been the world's cop for a long time.

[blitz]

Originally posted by sling322
Sorry to break this to you Blitz....but the US has been the world's cop for a long time.

Even worse then, but thats a new step we see now and we strongly dislike it because this cop ( Bush & the boys) are corrupt.

Regards Blitz




America is threatened by Iraq in no way, it's just plain redicoulous

[Suave]

Thus far the inspections haven't yeilded much, or even deterred Hussien from his pursuit of WMD .

I see it like this we really only have two choices:

1 Permanent inspections, with our military deployed to the region for decades, pissing off the Saudi  people who resent our presence and taxing our economy . The inspections would have to be indefinite, as soon as the UN and US leave, he would be back to his old tricks.

2 Finish the war that has been going on for too long and get the bulk of our forces out of there . Yes there will be bloodshed, but it will be brief and it will mean much less bloodshed in the future. Yes we will need civil affairs personel in country to stabilize and rebuild. But again this is much less costly than option 1 .

In my opinion option #2 will yield the most happiness, for us, the Iraqis and the Saudis .

[Ghosth]

3 points

A Saddam has weapons of mass distructoin. We KNOW this, they have scuds they havn't used, chem & biological weapons that could in theory destroy any country. They have been trying for years to get a Nucular capability.

B He will use them, he has used them in the past on both enemy's & his OWN PEOPLE!

C Even if he himself does NOT use them, how hard is it for him to say. "Hey terrorists, want to have some fun? Come get this stuff & scatter it wherever you like"

If it was just one of any of these 3 points we would  not Prepareing to
invade. Example, North Korea & their breeder reactor.

Fact remains hes is not only a threat to us, but the whole world.

[Ping]

But what really matters is that by the end of the night I'm prolly gonna be truely hammered.

[kbman]

Does anyone have solid evidence that Saddam has only one testicle? If  that were the case, then I think the comparisons to Hitler would be more substantive. I withhold judgement until I see the evidence.

kbman