Author Topic: A point of Reason  (Read 1829 times)

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
A point of Reason
« on: April 14, 2003, 07:07:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dowding
Simply pointing out that slamming France for looking after its own interests, while hanging on to some illusion that the US hasn't done the same is a little daft.

You ought to read some of the resolutions the US had vetoed in relation to Israel - they make interesting reading.


Lets look at this a mite more carefully..

Iraq sits on the biggest pile of oil.. and wants a nuclear plant. France sells it to them. You think Iraq needs a nuclear plant to generate cheap electricity?

Iraq butchers it's own people with WMD, invades Kuwait, amasses the 3rd largest army in the world .. do you think France slapped an embargo on thier military exports to Iraq??

Do you find it somehow 'wrong' that the United States and UK form a coalition with other like minded nations to toss this mass murdering Iraqi dictator?

Is there something wrong in sending the world a strong message that the policy of arming, succoring or supporting or doing ANY buisness with a mass murdering terrorist supporting regime is not going to be greeted with anything other than loud demands that such activity cease?

What is so difficult to understand about defining that a date in history has arrived where such actions that support terrorist states are in fact actions that make you an enemy of the Coalition Against Terror?

No, the days of 'Gray Areas' have slipped behind us. Yes, the world is quickly becoming 'Black and White'.. Nations MUST pick a stance.. support terror states, suffer the consequences. No more mealy mouthed 'just looking after our intrests'.. if your 'intrests' are tied up in terror states, you invested poorly.

possibly fataly.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A point of Reason
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2003, 07:28:36 PM »
Gray? Gray?

You want to ban or perk their favorite color?
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Seeker

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
A point of Reason
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2003, 07:47:00 PM »
What colour are the IRA?

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A point of Reason
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2003, 07:59:46 PM »
Looks like they're wearin' black hats from here.

Brits stole their country fair and square, pardner, just like we did to the Indians... after the Brits showed us how to do it, anyways.

So, they better just cinch up and ride on.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
A point of Reason
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2003, 08:08:01 PM »
Are you having trouble deciding whether you're for them or against them?

Quote
Originally posted by Seeker
What colour are the IRA?

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
A point of Reason
« Reply #5 on: April 14, 2003, 08:14:38 PM »
One of the reasons Britan so strongly supports us now is we ended the 'blind eye' policy towards support for the IRA comming from America.

Support for Terrorism, regardless of flag, (and YES, this includes israel) MUST stop.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline Arlo

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24760
A point of Reason
« Reply #6 on: April 14, 2003, 08:30:41 PM »
Israeli terrorism? :rolleyes: I think you'll find that the U.S. taking a no nonsense stance against terrorism will create closer bonds with Israel than ever before.

 Israel has been dealing with terrorists attacking it's people for a long time. Palestinians being terrorized by Israelis? I don't buy it for a second. You and I both know that the IDF doesn't have the resources to do anything but concentrate efforts on those who are strongly suspected of being/supporting terrorist activity.

Everytime there's a photo of an Israeli tank or a patrol walking down the street with Palestinian children nearby then there's people wanting to use them as "proof" of oppression. It's not. For those who wish to believe it, there's no need. For those who don't easily fall for such rather obvious photo ops, it's just as much a waste of time.

I would like to think that if you lived in an area where known ... publically vocal, admitted terrorists were next door. Terrorists who have said, in no uncertain terms, they will not stop their acts of terrorism until you, your wife, your children, your parents, your friends ... were all dead ... at their hands ....  I would like to think that you wouldn't be running around calling whatever defense or guard units that were assuring your safety and rooting out the threat ... terrorists.

Ahem ....

Thank you. :D

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
A point of Reason
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2003, 08:48:29 PM »
both sides in the palestinian israli conflict have lost all credibility in my eyes.

i flat refuse to look upon a nation that elects as it's chief politician a genuine bomb tossing terrorist as an ally. I see no diffrence between charon and arafat. None.

Instead, I'm lookin at isreal with american eyeballs.. peace and stability are my new watchwords.. those that threaten it are american adversarys.

A peace treaty was signed. Time to enforce it.. at the point of a gun if necessary. Every settlement raised under Charons proxy is another bomb earmarked for an american building, thanks to our blind support for a regime in israel that sponsors blatant racisim.
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
A point of Reason
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2003, 08:59:10 PM »
Hangtime, since I am in an unusually anti-American mood tonight - or rather since I am in a mood to contradict just about anyone I can, I shall do so here too :D.

Iraq sits on the biggest pile of oil.. and wants a nuclear plant. France sells it to them. You think Iraq needs a nuclear plant to generate cheap electricity?

Who cares what Iraq wants to do? Atomic energy is cleaner and doesn't mess up the environment like burning oil does. The iraqis probably have bad feeling because they burned all those fields in '91, and the French are just pitching in to make earth a cleaner place. How dare you question their motives?

Seriously though, business is business. There are types of reactors that do not produce weapons grade plutonium. Don't think the Iraqis ordered that, but cannot confirm it

Iraq butchers it's own people with WMD, invades Kuwait, amasses the 3rd largest army in the world .. do you think France slapped an embargo on thier military exports to Iraq??

Saddam didn't butcher his own people with WMDs. He killed Kurds and members of hostile tribes. The West, in its infinite wisdom, divided up the Middle East without taking into account different tribes and ethnic groups. So while Saddam killed Iraqis, it wasn't 'his' people. Of course one could argue this is a mere semantics issue.

Do you find it somehow 'wrong' that the United States and UK form a coalition with other like minded nations to toss this mass murdering Iraqi dictator?

I find it wrong and hypocritical to give Saddam WMDs and be his friend when it suits the US and then complain when France does the same thing, only to a much lesser degree. (I've posted references to the US sellling of bacteria and the like in another thread, can search for it if you doubt this). The US knew who Saddam was - 'he's a son of a squeak, but he's OUR son of a squeak'. Thing is, with him being a SOB, he changed allegiance. So I agree with what they do NOW, but the US should try to play High And Morally Correct considering what Raygun and the likes of him did. France protects its interests, the US does the same. Sometimes the two are conflicting and usually the guy with the bigger gun wins out and gets to be the Moral Righteous Dude, at least to the ignorant public who swallow stories whole without checking on history. Not saying that you do it, but the general population (my faith in the general population, after seeing some 'peace, not bombs' activists, have gone to an all time low).

Is there something wrong in sending the world a strong message that the policy of arming, succoring or supporting or doing ANY buisness with a mass murdering terrorist supporting regime is not going to be greeted with anything other than loud demands that such activity cease?

Nope. Should have done that 25 years ago, instead of supplying a tyrant with weapons so he could defeat or fend off an Enemy Of The US at the time (Iran).

What is so difficult to understand about defining that a date in history has arrived where such actions that support terrorist states are in fact actions that make you an enemy of the Coalition Against Terror?

Nothing. I'd just want the historical context to be brought in so Patriots in Europe and elsewhere don't put themselves up to be righteous always-doing-the-right-thing-ists.

No, the days of 'Gray Areas' have slipped behind us. Yes, the world is quickly becoming 'Black and White'..

Here we disagree my friend. The world becomes more, not less, complex. It becomes more shades of gray. Aye, some things are crystallized and made simple, yet others become ever more complex.

Nations MUST pick a stance.. support terror states, suffer the consequences.

Yes, and nations must also be able to understand that 'if you're not with us, you're against us' is an over simplification of things. A little example: George wants to steal an apple from his neighbors apple tree. He tells Frank, who says he ain't in on it because his mother knows the neighbor.  George tells John, who is undecided and the two try to convince  him to do/not do the thing. At no time does Frank threaten to tell the neighbor about the plan. Yet George claims that Frank, by his reluctance to go along with the plan, is now against him; effectively allied with the neighbor and actively supporting him as much as he can.

This is not true and the whole story is an oversimplification of therealpolitics of today

more mealy mouthed 'just looking after our intrests'.. if your 'intrests' are tied up in terror states, you invested poorly.

Aye. And the US has made such investments in the past. I guess that's where some resentment grows - the apparent hypocricy. Now *I* know that times have changed along with administrations. I understand the new conditions and the new post 9/11 world and what choices it brings. And still I dislike the Holier Than Thou attitude found in European AND American societies. It'd be much simpler if people were honest and put the cards on the table; no rational man would argue against the need to do what you say then Hangtime. But the resentment from the apparent hypocricy make people choke and angry, which grows resentment, which grows counter resentment, which suddenly turns French fries into Freedom fries.


possibly fataly.


Oh touché. Almost missed it. Was actually a very good use of a short, yet powerful end commentary. Nice touch - for a Runstang driver. :D


__________________

Offline NUKE

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8599
      • Arizona Greens
A point of Reason
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2003, 09:15:22 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Toad
Brits stole their country fair and square, pardner, just like we did to the Indians... after the Brits showed us how to do it, anyways.

 


I wouldn't say we stole the Indian's "country" per say.

Seems to me we got most if not all our land legally.

1st we won independence from England and took over the colonies

2nd, we purchased from France( Louisianna Purchase) all the land from the Misssissippi, west to the Rockies, south from the Gulf of Mexico and north to Canada in 1803 .

3rd, Mexico ceded all claims to it's territory west from the Rockies to the west coast, north to the 49th parallel and south to the Rio Grande.

Texas joined the union having first been controlled by various groups including the Spanish, Mexicans and an independent Texas state.

Can't leave out the Purchase of Alaska from Russia

In truth, we are not the one's who stole the Indians land. Actually did the Indians ever have legal onwership of any clearly defined land area?

So to say America stole the Indians land is somewhat of a falsehood in my opinion.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2003, 09:27:28 PM by NUKE »

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A point of Reason
« Reply #10 on: April 14, 2003, 09:24:34 PM »
Ever heard the phrase "hotter than a $2 pistol?"

What is your position on buying known stolen goods from a known fence?


;)
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!

Offline Hangtime

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10148
A point of Reason
« Reply #11 on: April 14, 2003, 09:45:56 PM »
Quote
I find it wrong and hypocritical to give Saddam WMDs and be his friend when it suits the US and then complain when France does the same thing, only to a much lesser degree. (I've posted references to the US sellling of bacteria and the like in another thread, can search for it if you doubt this). The US knew who Saddam was - 'he's a son of a squeak, but he's OUR son of a squeak'. Thing is, with him being a SOB, he changed allegiance.


Yup. Funny thing about us americans.. we play baseball. When yer at the plate eyeballing the pitcher, the last thing to worry about is what team that assbite played for last season.

We can't do a damn thing about the last 100 years worth of mistakes..  Grandpa always said.. 'cut the cards'. This hand's been dealt. Now we gotta play 'em, and we're not trying to draw to an inside straight. We already hold the aces. Wanna place a bet?

Quote
but the US should (not) try to play High And Morally Correct considering what Raygun and the likes of him did


Oh, I dunno.. after two world wars which left our borders unchanged, a coupla gazzzillion billion crisp US dollars spent to preserve the western democracys in the face of world-wide communisim and toltalitarianisim should give us some small bragging rights, doncha think?

 
Quote
France protects its interests, the US does the same.


Yesterdays French Intrests looked a hell of a lot like the demise of Americas Intrests Tomorrow to me. I dunno what in hell France's problem with pulling the plug outright on Saddam 13 years ago was... I do know we sure as hell did. Don't blame Frances inability to discern saddam as an enemy with ours. When we put him on the 'don't feed this animal' list, the French shoulda started investing in Russian oil pipelines to europe.  

 
Quote
Here we disagree my friend. The world becomes more, not less, complex. It becomes more shades of gray. Aye, some things are crystallized and made simple, yet others become ever more complex.


Yah.. know whatcha mean. Budwieser tastes great unless yer snortin coke. Then it tastes like crap and Heiniken tastes great. Go Figure.

Quote
It'd be much simpler if people were honest and put the cards on the table; no rational man would argue against the need to do what you say then Hangtime. But the resentment from the apparent hypocricy make people choke and angry, which grows resentment, which grows counter resentment, which suddenly turns French fries into Freedom fries.


Whelp.. if the only cohesive argument to not supporting terror is that we created castro 50 years ago, and the world continues to judge us by allende and noriega then all is lost. If on the other hand we start doing the right thing like pinching the places that breed the disease, and cutting the apron strings to antagonist states like israel, maybe you'll get the resta the way up on the bandwagon and help flog the horses into a gallop.

If america judged europe by the same wayback machine they use to paint our portraits we'd still be sending bomber harris over berlin every night. We only ask that THIS american administration be judged on the world stage by what it does NOW.. not by what the past ones did. Just as we're judging the French Administration based on what it's doing NOW.

Meantime, I hope our boneheaded dimwit of a president really is doing the right thing and is not just another haliburton puppet.

gives me the willies to even murmur it.

 
Quote
Oh touché. Almost missed it. Was actually a very good use of a short, yet powerful end commentary. Nice touch - for a Runstang driver.  


We've been grasping for straws ever since Teddy Roosevelt said 'Speak softly, but carry a big stick'. On the BBS, it's YELL AT THE PINHEADS, CAUSE THEY CAN'T READ!
The price of Freedom is the willingness to do sudden battle, anywhere, any time and with utter recklessness...

...at home, or abroad.

Offline StSanta

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2496
A point of Reason
« Reply #12 on: April 15, 2003, 05:44:03 AM »
Hangtime writes:

Yup. Funny thing about us americans.. we play baseball. When yer at the plate eyeballing the pitcher, the last thing to worry about is what team that assbite played for last season.

LOL, aye can relate to that. Our mercenary soccery players do much the same. But at least we hav the decency to booooooh them when they touch the ball playing on their former home stadium. That makes us a more moral people than you Yanks :D.

We can't do a damn thing about the last 100 years worth of mistakes.. Grandpa always said.. 'cut the cards'. This hand's been dealt. Now we gotta play 'em, and we're not trying to draw to an inside straight. We already hold the aces. Wanna place a bet?

For a Yank, you make a lot of sense. And yer way of putting it is very Yank-esque too. Your point is very valid and I read it as you now put it in your first post. Just thought I'd add it to get a perspective on things.

Oh, I dunno.. after two world wars which left our borders unchanged, a coupla gazzzillion billion crisp US dollars spent to preserve the western democracys in the face of world-wide communisim and toltalitarianisim should give us some small bragging rights, doncha think?

Yes, IF you are as open about your failures and dirty skunkwork too. Allende, for instance. Pinochet. Aiding the Taliban. Vietnam and the domino effect. And also it'd be nice if there was some kind of recognition of the fact that the US didn't do it all by themselves. But other than that, I agree that you've earned your bragging rights. Bragging can be done tactfully or arrogantly though, without the need to pee on other nations that disagree on certain topics. I.e what I sometimes find lacking in Americans is the ability to put themselves in someone elses shoes and realize that they, too, feel passionately about something - for a reason. Just a wee bit tired of being grouped together with Chirac and his actions. That dude wants the EU to become powerful so he can use it as an extention of France's glory. France isn't a superpower any more. It really isn't that important a country, come to think of it. Anyway, Denmark is far more important because our girls are better looking and not so snobby. Come visit and I'm sure they can show you how friendly our female population can be. Even to runstang driving cat hate/lovers.

Yesterdays French Intrests looked a hell of a lot like the demise of Americas Intrests Tomorrow to me. I dunno what in hell France's problem with pulling the plug outright on Saddam 13 years ago was... I do know we sure as hell did. Don't blame Frances inability to discern saddam as an enemy with ours. When we put him on the 'don't feed this animal' list, the French shoulda started investing in Russian oil pipelines to europe.

I don't know how many times the US has run over European interests. American judge Saddam as an immediate, clear and present danger. France doesn't. And to be honest when I first got a hint that Bush was out after Iraq I *laughed* at the idea. Sure he is a murderous tyrant, but an intelligent such if he'd wanted to spread WMDs he could have done it long ago and so forth. So the same situation is evaluated differently, not just because of economy. As we now have seen, what happened in Iraq is part of a much bigger Bush administration agenda/policy - i.e instead of remaining passive and expecting Saddam to behave, the US takes a risk in an attempt to at least control the most obvious areas where WMD might be stored or made.

So I think this is a complex issue with many ingredients. Aye, there is economical issues for France. Then there's pride - France has always been an arrogant country and it has *always* worked semi-against the US. Must annoy the hell out of them that Americans can be less arrogant yet despite their'simple mindedness and lack of sophistication' more powerful. Me, I like seeing Chiraq getting put down. Probably is some Viking instinct in me from back in the days when they intently disliked the 'northern savages' :D. Sorry straffo (who might be related to me through rape...err, read 'inter-marriage'.

Yah.. know whatcha mean. Budwieser tastes great unless yer snortin coke. Then it tastes like crap and Heiniken tastes great. Go Figure.

ROFL! Hm, haven't tried that, but I assume it is as with Carlsberg and Tuborg. Guess I'll have to go find me a few pounds of the white stuff - in the interest of science, I must throughoutly investigate your claim

Whelp.. if the only cohesive argument to not supporting terror is that we created castro 50 years ago, and the world continues to judge us by allende and noriega then all is lost. If on the other hand we start doing the right thing like pinching the places that breed the disease, and cutting the apron strings to antagonist states like israel, maybe you'll get the resta the way up on the bandwagon and help flog the horses into a gallop.

Good point. However, in light of previous incidents and previous American claims ('we're doing this for the greater good of mankind' type arguments) you must understand why there is widespread skepticism towards what the real goals for US administrations are. I mean, Average joe you can sell 'Operation Liberation' crap to, but anyone with a semblance of a mind and a little understanding of REAL LIFE (as in dog eats dog) knows that even 'righteous' nations do what they need to do to keep their people fat and happy.

FWIW, I'm with the US, but I'll judge each situation as it comes. Cannot just hand you a blank check and then trust Bush and his administration. In part because I feel your political system isn't really representative of the people - there's too much money and too few choices and too many obvious lies for me to have any real trust in the American political system. Oddly enough judging by voter apathy, I am not the only one with this attitude. And yes I know I shouldn't meddle in US affairs coz I ain't a yank, but when something interests me or affects me, I meddle anyway. Have a right to an informed opinion and all :)

If Bush handles NK in an OK way, and IF he puts pressure on Israel, then I shall be impressed by him. NK can be dealt with diplomatically - however there is too much pressure from religious right and Jewish lobbying groups for Bush to really apply pressure on Israel. And I honestly don't think he cares so much about the israeli/Palestinian situation. More like handling it like a neessary evil that must be dealt with, sort of like struggling with 'do I get up to take a piss or do I stay in bed and try to fall asleep?' Status quo is acceptable to him, I think.

But maybe I've misjudged him

If america judged europe by the same wayback machine they use to paint our portraits we'd still be sending bomber harris over berlin every night. We only ask that THIS american administration be judged on the world stage by what it does NOW.. not by what the past ones did. Just as we're judging the French Administration based on what it's doing NOW.

Excellent point. An objective person would do just that and I'll strive to do it myself as well as inspiring others to do the same.

Meantime, I hope our boneheaded dimwit of a president really is doing the right thing and is not just another haliburton puppet.

gives me the willies to even murmur it.


LOL! This is an EXACT copy of my own thoughts on it. He might be changed from the coke snorting rich playboy he was - I do believe the man came out of that stronger and with integrity. The question is who is really in control. Personally I sense that the pupeteers thought they easily could control Bush. Perhaps they can, but I suspect that they do, to some extent, control him, but they're finding it much more difficult than expected.


We've been grasping for straws ever since Teddy Roosevelt said 'Speak softly, but carry a big stick'. On the BBS, it's YELL AT THE PINHEADS, CAUSE THEY CAN'T READ!

ROFL! LOL that's just plain nasty, allied PheegkDogkk! :D

Offline Dowding

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6867
      • http://www.psys07629.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/272/index.html
A point of Reason
« Reply #13 on: April 15, 2003, 06:09:21 AM »
Must have missed this one.

Santa has answered many of your points. For me, you still haven't countered the fundamental point I was making. Each nation looks after its own interests.

And how can you claim moral authority when discussing Iraq? Your government put Saddam there, ignored his murderous regime, sold him the means to use WMD on his neighbours (and didn't stop when he used them on thousands of civilians either). Everyone knew exactly what we was capable of.

You might claim naivety. If that is the case, then it's the largest incidence of wishful thinking since the people of troy decided a nice big wooden horse would look peachy in the middle of their city.

No Westerner can claim the moral high ground for their government, in relation to Iraq. And the argument about freeing Iraq doesn't wash. This conflict was about WMD - the whole humanitarian thing was spun into the equation only very recently. A nice side-effect, especially for the people of Iraq, but a side-effect none-the-less.

Toad - "After the British showed us how to"? Sounds like you are shifting responsibility again. Being the land of the free (and given that the British were the great Yuropean Satan), America should have embraced the Indians, let them keep all that rich Western States land and been all altruistic and decent to bow-and-arrow shooting friends. Maybe opened a petting zoo for the buffalo instead of driving them to near extinction. :D
War! Never been so much fun. War! Never been so much fun! Go to your brother, Kill him with your gun, Leave him lying in his uniform, Dying in the sun.

Offline Toad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18415
A point of Reason
« Reply #14 on: April 15, 2003, 07:19:09 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dowding
.

Toad - "After the British showed us how to"? Sounds like you are shifting responsibility again.  


Not at all. Read the part where I said "we stole it fair and square".

That's the part you never seem to be able to admit. You guys stole Northern Ireland. Period. No if's, and's or but's. You stole a whole bunch of other places too... you might even hold the record for stealing places. But it seems you just can't admit it.

I can and do.

As for the "learned from the Brits"... well? Credit where credit is due. Who was the best at stealing places back then?

Lastly, we became "us" or (US) in 1776. Look where the frontier was then and what had happened to the Indian tribes "behind" that frontier.
If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude than the animated contest of freedom, go from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains sit lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen!