Author Topic: Wbill strike again;) (Read 1029 times)

Raubvogel · « **Reply #15 on:** July 23, 2003, 09:14:03 AM »

Aren't there enough crappy half-finished games centered around 1940 ETO?

ViFF · « **Reply #16 on:** July 23, 2003, 09:18:51 AM »

just saw this too on the total sims bob website:

Quote

Over 72 airplanes, 15 tanks and ground vehicles, ships and aircraft carriers, and many of the important artillery pieces of the period.

I would love to see which types they reffering to when they say "over 72 airplanes" in a game set on the 1940-41 time frame.

let me guess... could this be the original 72 airplanes already in the WB3 program ? like the Ki61, Ki-43, F4U, P-51D & Fw190D ?

All those that have nothing to do with the bob...

WestyAH · « **Reply #17 on:** July 23, 2003, 09:24:10 AM »

True it doesn't jive with a realistic BoB. But it does with "WB:1942" !!

Dowding · « **Reply #18 on:** July 23, 2003, 09:24:18 AM »

Quote

I can only offer my sympathy to those who are still sticking with iEN and wb3.

While I can offer a figurative slap around the chops for anyone who would consider supporting this incompetent degenerate of a man. Why on earth would anyone give money to this idiot is beyond me.

majic · « **Reply #19 on:** July 23, 2003, 11:13:06 AM »

Uhg. I bought this Civil War game with the History Channel logo on it. Worst piece of crap ever. I thought since I had seen Sid Meier's Gettysburg years ago, they could have improved on the size and scale of a game like that. They didn't even come close to that scale. The History Channel logo on a game now means to me it will probably suck.

EDIT: Hey, what do you know, I just looked at the cd and it carries the Activision name too.

muckmaw · « **Reply #20 on:** July 23, 2003, 11:23:51 AM »

If you've made the game right, you don't need any logo on it. It will sell itself. Games are sold by word of mouth and reviews if they are good, and logos and flashy advertising if the suck.

majic · « **Reply #21 on:** July 23, 2003, 11:45:39 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by muckmaw
If you've made the game right, you don't need any logo on it. It will sell itself. Games are sold by word of mouth and reviews if they are good, and logos and flashy advertising if the suck.

I know, but I'm really stupid. And I mean stupid.

Sikboy · « **Reply #22 on:** July 23, 2003, 11:52:33 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by muckmaw
If you've made the game right, you don't need any logo on it. It will sell itself. Games are sold by word of mouth and reviews if they are good, and logos and flashy advertising if the suck.

If you are trying to attrack new customers, the right marketing does wonders. My guess is that they are attempting to grab people who didn't walk into wal-mart looking for a flight simulator.

Now, after they log on and play for a while, hopefully they will end up over here in AH lol.

-Sik

Bcnu · « **Reply #23 on:** July 23, 2003, 11:59:09 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Ack-Ack

What's amazing from the WB forums is that none of the phan boyz caught the Japanese plane screenshot for the BoB game.
Ack-Ack

Probably because it took four posts for WBers to do exactly that where they can speak freely, on a.g.w. (and the first three were mainly "I can't think of anything civil to say" hehe)

http://agw.warbirdsiii.com/bbs/showthread.php?s=&threadid=22743

Also apparently the ETO volunteer team says their terrain is not the one to be used in this box, FWIW.

Kekule · « **Reply #24 on:** July 23, 2003, 12:03:14 PM »

viff, you know your comment regarding the player-made terrain being used for BoB is incorrect. WBs and iEN has lots of problems, there's no need to fabricate more.

And... I'm surprised AH players even know what a Ki-43 looks like.

Anyway, from what I can tell, it looks like a spitfire in the image, not a Ki-61. I don't fly dweebfires so what the hell do I know?

Fear not, WB haters, in due time you might just get your wish.

Kekule
18th Sentai

Ack-Ack · « **Reply #25 on:** July 23, 2003, 12:08:32 PM »

It's so obvious that we are all missing it.

Wild Bill = Voss

Ack-Ack

Ack-Ack · « **Reply #26 on:** July 23, 2003, 12:10:45 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by majic

EDIT: Hey, what do you know, I just looked at the cd and it carries the Activision name too.

Most like one of Activision's Value games.

Ack-Ack

Apache · « **Reply #27 on:** July 23, 2003, 12:10:54 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Kekule
viff, you know your comment regarding the player-made terrain being used for BoB is incorrect. WBs and iEN has lots of problems, there's no need to fabricate more.

And... I'm surprised AH players even know what a Ki-43 looks like.

Anyway, from what I can tell, it looks like a spitfire in the image, not a Ki-61. I don't fly dweebfires so what the hell do I know?

Fear not, WB haters, in due time you might just get your wish.

Kekule
18th Sentai

Of course we know what one looks like. There is a piss load of us here from WB.

...and you're welcome here anytime, IMO.

ramzey · « **Reply #28 on:** July 23, 2003, 12:10:55 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Kekule
viff, you know your comment regarding the player-made terrain being used for BoB is incorrect. WBs and iEN has lots of problems, there's no need to fabricate more.

And... I'm surprised AH players even know what a Ki-43 looks like.

Anyway, from what I can tell, it looks like a spitfire in the image, not a Ki-61. I don't fly dweebfires so what the hell do I know?

Fear not, WB haters, in due time you might just get your wish.

Kekule
18th Sentai

oh, som of us even know how look ki84:)

btw. fast responce, pictures was changed now;)

Kekule · « **Reply #29 on:** July 23, 2003, 12:25:14 PM »

Thanks apache.

That was just a tongue in cheek joke from this gnat-dweeb. hehe