« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: New beta.  (Read 1011 times)

Offline MaddDog

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 247
New beta.
« on: October 20, 2003, 05:42:43 PM »
New Betas out, wOOt wOOt:D :aok
Logged

Offline F4i

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 368
      • http://www.ghost-squadron.org/main/frame.html
New beta.
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2003, 09:17:57 PM »
I'm sooo glad that the frame rates have come up.  :aok

TBolt
Logged

Offline mrblack

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2191
New beta.
« Reply #2 on: October 21, 2003, 01:09:07 AM »
Just goes to show that HTC is on the job:aok

I am in AW of these guys!
I only wish I could write code.

But i simply don't have the grey matter for it LOL.
Can you imaging making computer games for a living?
What a blast that must be for a creative mind:)
« Last Edit: October 21, 2003, 01:23:42 AM by mrblack »
Logged

Offline MaddDog

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 247
Exactly
« Reply #3 on: October 21, 2003, 01:17:09 AM »
You can see in this beta already that its starting to improve, my frame rates are alot more steady and also higher.:)
Logged

Offline Ghosth

  • AH Training Corps (retired)
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8497
      • http://332nd.org
New beta.
« Reply #4 on: October 21, 2003, 07:48:17 AM »
Mine went from 25 in tower to 45.

THANK YOU HTC!
Logged

Offline RazrWire

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
New beta.
« Reply #5 on: October 21, 2003, 10:03:56 AM »
My frame rate went from 45-60 down to about 8-12 at the lowest settings.  My computer cant handle all these graphics i suppose.  Looks like there goes another game to technology.  first WW2OL now this.

RazrWire
     -Dirty Fokkers-
Logged

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
New beta.
« Reply #6 on: October 21, 2003, 11:11:21 AM »
"Looks like there goes another game to technology. first WW2OL now this."

Technology moves forward ... so must we.
Logged
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
New beta.
« Reply #7 on: October 21, 2003, 11:31:13 AM »
Problem is still when firing guns though, brings my frame rate from 50-60 down to 8.
Logged
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
New beta.
« Reply #8 on: October 21, 2003, 02:07:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wilbus
Problem is still when firing guns though, brings my frame rate from 50-60 down to 8.


"We're only interested in the tower frame-rates for now. We'll address flying
frame-rates in future beta releases. "
Logged

Offline RangerBob

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 70
New beta.
« Reply #9 on: October 21, 2003, 03:33:24 PM »
"My frame rate went from 45-60 down to about 8-12 at the lowest settings. My computer cant handle all these graphics i suppose. Looks like there goes another game to technology. first WW2OL now this. "

RazrWire,

1st, they are right when they say technology moves on. I'm wondering what kind of a pc you have? Maybe you just need a video card upgrade?

2nd, You should note that WWII Online recently optimized their code to help correct the stutter/frame rate problems they had. They made enormous progress, especially with Pentium 4's.

3rd, This is really a beta release. You just can't judge the fps while they are testing, and looking for input. Wait until they make their final adjustments to pass judgement on the frame rate problem.

Ranger Bob
Logged

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
New beta.
« Reply #10 on: October 21, 2003, 05:00:36 PM »
Thats one of the things about computers technology is always moving forward, it never stands still; perhaps you'd happier with a console toy? I hear those purple boxes of crap are coming down for Christmas.
Logged

Offline Glasses

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1811
New beta.
« Reply #11 on: October 21, 2003, 09:01:57 PM »
Yup my FPS at TWR is at a steady 59 FPS probably because of my Shatty monitor.They have nontheless come up flying like they said would be addressed later(they're still crappy) :D :aok
Logged

Offline RazrWire

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2
New beta.
« Reply #12 on: October 21, 2003, 09:31:58 PM »
i have a P3 596mHz processor, MX440 64mb video card, 640mb of ram, Win XP home... cable, what else?  i know my P3 is my bottle neck, but i just dont have the time or the money to invest in a new computer.
Logged

Offline BenDover

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5803
New beta.
« Reply #13 on: October 22, 2003, 02:02:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Glasses
Yup my FPS at TWR is at a steady 59 FPS probably because of my Shatty monitor.They have nontheless come up flying like they said would be addressed later(they're still crappy) :D :aok


Why don't you up your refresh rate?
Even crap monitors should be able to push past 75.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »