1
Films and Screenshots / Re: Some people rely on alternate facts
« Last post by Shane on Today at 04:33:43 AM »My point is that afterword on 200 you acted as if I intentionally rammed you...
It takes some imagination to think that somebody like me who can barely fly a fighter would have the "skill" to intentionally "ram" you.
I have seen others do it so I know it is possible. I've seen a fighter that was out of ammo pull up in front of a bomber and kill it somehow after they said they were out of ammo and going to ram them.
Here's the rest of the film... continues for a few minutes after your death in which... well, watch for yourself and then try to walk back your bs from above.
My point was, work on your HO or learn to move out of the way. If you look at your first Ho/ram (the one I didn't get a message saying I collided with you) you will see that instead of pulling into a HO/ram solution, I held fire and went under you, getting a pw from your shot as you clipped your prop on your front end. The second one I decided to forego and trade HO/rams with you, and I won.
At no point did I claim that you deliberately tried to ram me in the sense you're claiming; you ho/rammed exactly for the reason you stated yourself, "...somebody like me who can barely fly a fighter..." or did you? Your stats indicate you're above "barely capable." I think I named the film appropriately.
Naw, you're just here on my ankle, misrepresenting, because I made your feels all uncomfortable.
<edit: lofl, you didn't even watch the film I posted first, just straight up went into your deflection. Maybe watch both films so you can put less misrepresentation in your misrepresenting.>