Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => The O' Club => Topic started by: stealth on May 23, 2011, 07:34:16 PM
-
Nuff Said http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coiTJbr9m04 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coiTJbr9m04)
Info on Multiplayerhttp://kotaku.com/5801353/ (http://kotaku.com/5801353/)
(http://mmgn.com/Lib/Images/Blogs/Normal/Modern-Warfare-3-Development-Blog-19-05-2011-1069469.jpg)
(http://www.modernwarfare3xbox360.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/official_modern_warfare_3_trailer-300x201.jpg)
-
I WANT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O :O
-
BF3.
-
BF3.
this.
kotaku had some leaked gameplay footage of mw3 out for 2 days before it got shut down, its nothing special.
COD is nothing but the same crap repackaged each year. The only reason is sells like it does is because
1. Advertisement.
2. its the easiest fps to play. it takes very little skill to learn so even the "casual" gamer can get into it.
ive stoped buying any activision game after what they did to infinity ward.
-
saw it already but ill watch more vids when it comes out so i can decide
-
BF3.
(http://www.honda-tech.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=43810&stc=1&d=1243914682)
-
Im sorry, and no offense, but if you waste your money on this game you are an idiot. Every COD since MW has SUCKED. Plus, BF3 is going to use COD as toilet paper.
This is gameplay, it looks better and sounds better then COD cinematic. Also as Tyran said, COD takes NO SKILL to play at all. Go snipe in BFBC2 and tell me its easy. When your shooting across for map with no auto aim, bullet drop, the different bullet speed depending on the gun, the different bullet weight, and the fact you have to lead and compinsate for the time it takes the bullet to get to the target, its NOTHING like COD. COD is point and shoot.
http://www.youtube.com/user/Battlefield?v=TfrrAp1blaM&feature=pyv&ad=10891138180&kw=BF3
-BigBOBCH
-
Im sorry, and no offense, but if you waste your money on this game you are an idiot. Every COD since MW has SUCKED. Plus, BF3 is going to use COD as toilet paper.
This is gameplay, it looks better and sounds better then COD cinematic.
-BigBOBCH
What about World at war?
-
omg i went through the whole vid and when it finished it said there were 408 more comments :O
-
What about World at war?
WAW got some of worst ratings, it was ok, not that great.
-BigBOBCH
-
What about World at war?
WaW blowed.
American Campaign was the worst ever all the Japanese did was charge no tactics. Made it super easy.
-
lol perfect comment
"Modern Warfare is like Die Hard, Battlefield is like Black Hawk Down
Both are fine, take your pick, or both for that matter :)"-HearingEveryRhyme
-
BF3.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
thread over
-
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
thread over
I agree. Even the COD makers know, that when BF3 is released they are going to have a MASSIVE fight on their hands. BF3 looks by far like one of the MOST AMAZING FPS EVER.
-BigBOBCH
-
I feel ashamed now, cause its my favorite online game to play. Single player is cool though.
-
I feel ashamed now, cause its my favorite online game to play. Single player is cool though.
Raptor, the problem is COD is TO easy to play. BF you require 20x the skill. Snipers, snipers are NO JOKE in BF, you have to know what your doing. You cant just point and shoot like in COD.
-BigBOBCH
-
Raptor, the problem is COD is TO easy to play. BF you require 20x the skill. Snipers, snipers are NO JOKE in BF, you have to know what your doing. You cant just point and shoot like in COD.
-BigBOBCH
my favorite class in Bf2
-
my favorite class in Bf2
Sniping is literally 20x harder in BF then COD, which is why I LOVE IT.
In BFBC2 I love blowing someones head off across the map, while I aim 3 feet above them and over 6 feet ahead of them to compensate for movement.
WAY more realistic then COD.
-BigBOBCH
-
My favorite role in BFBC2 is sniper with about a 68% hit percentage, but the best part is moving and spoting, calling out enemies and throwing disco balls and taking tags from unsuspecting people with my knife, lol my best game was when i followed this poor guy around and knifed him 5 times everytime i killed him i was coming out of the bushes he never seen me. Wookie suits rock lol
-
What about World at war?
the only good thing to come out of WaW was Zombies. the spawn system online was horrible, and all the cod ppl did was :furious over the tanks in the game (further proof they couldnt survive on battlefield).
plus, on single player hardcore mode, all the enemy did was spam grenades, that was god awful.
WaW blowed.
American Campaign was the worst ever all the Japanese did was charge no tactics. Made it super easy.
you mean banzai charging? that was a japanese tactic.
in All honesty, MW3 will sell more than BF3, because it shares the same winning success halo shares, which is advertisement.
mw2 will sell more, but bf3 will be the better game by far.
-
the only good thing to come out of WaW was Zombies. the spawn system online was horrible, and all the cod ppl did was :furious over the tanks in the game (further proof they couldnt survive on battlefield).
plus, on single player hardcore mode, all the enemy did was spam grenades, that was god awful.
you mean banzai charging? that was a japanese tactic.
in All honesty, MW3 will sell more than BF3, because it shares the same winning success halo shares, which is advertisement.
mw2 will sell more, but bf3 will be the better game by far.
exactly
-
You now realize that every commercial FPS is almost exactly the same with slight differences in multiplayer game modes and controller layouts
-
You guys need to love this video, I mean it's WW3. HOW IS THIS GAME NOT EPIC. If you think Battle Field or COD games are bad. Then eather I'm in the Matrix or you guys are only up for PC only games.
-
You guys need to love this video, I mean it's WW3. HOW IS THIS GAME NOT EPIC. If you think Battle Field or COD games are bad. Then eather I'm in the Matrix or you guys are only up for PC only games.
Battlefield being bad? no.
COD being bad? yes. there very unoriginal too. battlefield has pretty much done the modern warfare/ww3 aspect allready.
-
I am buying both, but I think BF3 will be overall cooler, Mw3 though, will be good to group up with friends and kill stuff on.
-
I got a question, if you guys actually watch youtube you'll know where I got this from.
If you could get a game right now, which would you choose. Modern Warfare 3 or Battle Field 3?
-
Same game engine with different textures for a 4th time?
Roll on BF3.
-
BF3.
QFT
-
Same game engine with different textures for a 4th time?
Roll on BF3.
This right here is the meat of the matter. BF3 will be using the Frostbite2 engine. The only down side to that is that there will be no DX9 support; I'm not entirely sure about this however. COD hasn't have a new engine since MW and it's beginning to show.
-
This right here is the meat of the matter. BF3 will be using the Frostbite2 engine. The only down side to that is that there will be no DX9 support; I'm not entirely sure about this however. COD hasn't have a new engine since MW and it's beginning to show.
just for clarification, W@W and Black Ops does NOT use the same game engine as the modern warfare series. MW uses the quak 3 engine i believe, designed by infinity ward.
W@W and BO are tryarch games. and use a completely diff engine.
but ether way, there both pretty bad. MW1 was the only game it looked stunning on. after that, nothing.
-
the only good thing to come out of WaW was Zombies. the spawn system online was horrible, and all the cod ppl did was :furious over the tanks in the game (further proof they couldnt survive on battlefield).
plus, on single player hardcore mode, all the enemy did was spam grenades, that was god awful.
you mean banzai charging? that was a japanese tactic.
in All honesty, MW3 will sell more than BF3, because it shares the same winning success halo shares, which is advertisement.
mw2 will sell more, but bf3 will be the better game by far.
Banzai charges were only used by the most determined troops when defeat was inevitable. Otherwise they'd surrender or the marines would blast and corkscrew them out of their caves. Jungle warfare was a mess.
CoD and Battlefield are apples and oranges. CoD is great for those times when you just want to crack some skulls. Battlefield is much tougher, but if you get together there can be some utterly hilarious moments (4 people in an IFV, 'nuff said). Along with that, you can have those epic moments like a 600 meter headshot with 50 caliber sniper rifle, or having some buddies give you on demand CAS with a UAV or helicopter.
However, CoD gives you more room to mess around (dual wielding shotguns with a crossbow that shoots explosive bolts, anyone) and has a greater 'fun' factor than many other games. The stupid stuff you can do (mowing people down out of a helicopter using a minigun) makes it all worth it. That isn't to say that you can't do awesome stuff in battlefield, either.
Gloating Story Begins Here
It was Rush on Atacama Desert in BFBC2, and I had just unlocked the USAS-12 (a full-auto shotgun). I grabbed the 'Assault' kit with six bricks of upgraded C4 and hopped in a helicopter. I flew over to the first base, parachuted out, blew a guy away. Then I shot another one, reloaded, and threw my C4 on the M-COM station. Another guy came, so I hurled a grenade over the top, ran to cover, and detonated my C4. 300+ points with the push of a button.
These two games do two different things, and are amazing in their own right. I will most certainly buy MW3 for the PS3 and BF3 for the PC, to get the most out of each platform and game.
-Penguin
-
BF3 is way better the COD. The point is it requires more skill, you cant just run and gun and point and shoot.
-BigBOBCH
-
Only way i would ever play BFBC3 is on PC, well as a matter of fact thats the only way i play FPS games, i Use my PS3 just for GT5, couple other racing games and the BluRay player.
-
BF3 is way better the COD. The point is it requires more skill, you cant just run and gun and point and shoot.
-BigBOBCH
That's where the fun is, though. CoD isn't supposed to be realistic, it's supposed to be wild and crazy! Have you ever wondered why Treyarch put in Nuketown and Firing Range? It's because those maps create a constant supply of action. WMD is awesome for SnD, the amount of space makes the tension almost unbearable.
-Penguin
-
That's where the fun is, though. CoD isn't supposed to be realistic, it's supposed to be wild and crazy! Have you ever wondered why Treyarch put in Nuketown and Firing Range? It's because those maps create a constant supply of action. WMD is awesome for SnD, the amount of space makes the tension almost unbearable.
-Penguin
those maps are also the most whined about by the COD community.
like i said, COD is easy mode fps, anyone can pick it up& immediately start to play it. it takes little to no skill to play, just the standard knowledge of "point shoot reload repeat".
most cod ppl hate battlefield because it requires them to use not only that knowledge, but to think up tactics, strategies, and other things cod lacks.
-
Only way i would ever play BFBC3 is on PC, well as a matter of fact thats the only way i play FPS games, i Use my PS3 just for GT5, couple other racing games and the BluRay player.
We need to get together on GT5 ZooM, I haven't played in a while but would be fun to do some pink slip racing.
-
this.
kotaku had some leaked gameplay footage of mw3 out for 2 days before it got shut down, its nothing special.
COD is nothing but the same crap repackaged each year. The only reason is sells like it does is because
1. Advertisement.
2. its the easiest fps to play. it takes very little skill to learn so even the "casual" gamer can get into it.
ive stoped buying any activision game after what they did to infinity ward.
Hey Tyrannis check out the logos at the end of the video...i spy an Infinity Ward logo ;)
-
Hey Tyrannis check out the logos at the end of the video...i spy an Infinity Ward logo ;)
well yes, infinity ward is the name of the group working on the MW versions of COD. but thats not the original IW team that made modern warefare 1/2. half of that team left activision over an ugly incident and joined with EA to form there own group (i believe they call themselves martyrdom now).
the IW team now, is the team that worked on warhammer 4,000 i believe. ether way activision is a money pig. who charges $15 for dlc content thats only worth about $5-$10. if Activision buys take-two, i will cry. because rockstar is a part of take-two. and rockstar is one of the very few game creators left who actually take pride in what they make (grand theft auto, red dead redemption, etc).
if activision was to take it over, they would create half of a game, then release the other half as DLC and charger $15-$20 extra so you could play the full game.
a clear sign of this is the fact that the original Infinity ward team wanted to give up on call of duty after 2, they didnt want the modern warfare series to be a part of the cod triligy. they merely wanted it to be called "modern warfare".
but activision made them slap the COD name on there and threatened to not publish the game if they didnt. because activision knows anything with COD slapped on its name sells. and then procded to advertise the crap out of it.
-
I have had fun on both comparable games, MW2 is fun, so is BFBC2
It is just a different style of game where as MW2 is more like an arcade game, BFBC2 is realistic. BFBC2's graphics destroy any other game I have ever played and I can't wait for their new one to come out this fall.
-
lol perfect comment
"Modern Warfare is like Die Hard, Battlefield is like Black Hawk Down
Both are fine, take your pick, or both for that matter :)"-HearingEveryRhyme
this
-
That's where the fun is, though. CoD isn't supposed to be realistic, it's supposed to be wild and crazy! Have you ever wondered why Treyarch put in Nuketown and Firing Range? It's because those maps create a constant supply of action. WMD is awesome for SnD, the amount of space makes the tension almost unbearable.
-Penguin
You dont get my point, any retard with one arm and two fingers can play COD. Its TO EASY, it requires no skill at all.
-BigBOBCH
-
Comparing BF3 to CoD is like comparing the pilots in AH who fly spits to the ones who fly anything else. BF3 is a bit more complex, while CoD is a bit more rambo style and gamey as well.
In the end they're both first person shooters, and I plan on getting both.
-
Dumb question but didnt Infinity ward get released from Activision?
How would infinity ward be able to make Call of Duty because isnt the rights owned by Activision?
-
All this is, is your opion. Why do you guys insist on beating each other up on what they like :lol.
All my friends are on COD so I would most likely play that, however BF is a much better game. I just can't get into consoles anymore. :salute
-
Dumb question but didnt Infinity ward get released from Activision?
How would infinity ward be able to make Call of Duty because isnt the rights owned by Activision?
because of this....
well yes, infinity ward is the name of the group working on the MW versions of COD. but thats not the original IW team that made modern warefare 1/2. half of that team left activision over an ugly incident and joined with EA to form there own group (i believe they call themselves martyrdom now).
the IW team now, is the team that worked on warhammer 4,000 i believe. ether way activision is a money pig. who charges $15 for dlc content thats only worth about $5-$10. if Activision buys take-two, i will cry. because rockstar is a part of take-two. and rockstar is one of the very few game creators left who actually take pride in what they make (grand theft auto, red dead redemption, etc).
if activision was to take it over, they would create half of a game, then release the other half as DLC and charger $15-$20 extra so you could play the full game.
a clear sign of this is the fact that the original Infinity ward team wanted to give up on call of duty after 2, they didnt want the modern warfare series to be a part of the cod triligy. they merely wanted it to be called "modern warfare".
but activision made them slap the COD name on there and threatened to not publish the game if they didnt. because activision knows anything with COD slapped on its name sells. and then procded to advertise the crap out of it.
-
Dumb question but didnt Infinity ward get released from Activision?
How would infinity ward be able to make Call of Duty because isnt the rights owned by Activision?
Nope ActiBlizz still owns the Infinity Ward studio but most of the old crew jumped ship after the two head men quit/got fired. Of course I'm a PC gamer so having to listen to Jason West and Vince Zampella trying to justify the crap they saddled them with all I could do was :rofl
-
meh...the CoD games remind me more and more of the Madden football series. Same basic game released year after year with different jersey colors, cover art and maybe a new feature or two.
-
Personally every COD after COD4 has been semi fun for the first week, then it is boring as hell. Why you ask? Because every COD the same game, the only difference is the maps and guns, im sorry, some of the guns.
-BigBOBCH
-
meh...the CoD games remind me more and more of the Madden football series. Same basic game released year after year with different jersey colors, cover art and maybe a new feature or two.
Yeah but that wasn't a problem until after how many umpty-teen-years of releases? It built EA Games. And it still makes a decent profit each year even though I think it's finally lost its nostalgia.
-
mehhh
wonky wonky donkey donkey dooodle dooodle dippity dippity doodie.
-
You dont get my point, any retard with one arm and two fingers can play COD. Its TO EASY, it requires no skill at all.
-BigBOBCH
Not all of it. It's simply not true.
Grab your copy of CoD, go on YouTube, and look up 360 noscope. Now get in a match, and try to replicate the feat. Not so easy, huh?
Try to get at least three kills every single time you die, without fail. Not so easy, huh?
Try to get a kill with a grenade across the map. Not so easy, huh?
The point is that CoD is a broader game than it appears. It's controls are intuitive and simple to use, and it seems like any idiot can pull off anything. This is simply not the case. Try doing tricks, try putting limitations on yourself, try setting achieve a supremely high goal. There are plenty of was to play CoD, and trust me, we may never see them all.
I like both BF, CoD, and heck, even HALO is fun once in a while. It's the reason why I can enjoy PacMan after a game of chess. Each is special and amazing (not to mention frustrating) in their own ways. I prefer battlefield, but having more people to play with on CoD is also fun.
In conclusion, you can never compare one game to another without running into their paradgims (the things you accept as part of the game without question). They are from almost two different genres, but each has something to offer.
-Penguin
-
my favorite cod game is the first modern warfare, anyone on here play on pc?
oh and my 10 year old sister can play cod like a pro haha
-
Not all of it. It's simply not true.
Grab your copy of CoD, go on YouTube, and look up 360 noscope. Now get in a match, and try to replicate the feat. Not so easy, huh?
Try to get at least three kills every single time you die, without fail. Not so easy, huh?
Try to get a kill with a grenade across the map. Not so easy, huh?
The point is that CoD is a broader game than it appears. It's controls are intuitive and simple to use, and it seems like any idiot can pull off anything. This is simply not the case. Try doing tricks, try putting limitations on yourself, try setting achieve a supremely high goal. There are plenty of was to play CoD, and trust me, we may never see them all.
I like both BF, CoD, and heck, even HALO is fun once in a while. It's the reason why I can enjoy PacMan after a game of chess. Each is special and amazing (not to mention frustrating) in their own ways. I prefer battlefield, but having more people to play with on CoD is also fun.
In conclusion, you can never compare one game to another without running into their paradgims (the things you accept as part of the game without question). They are from almost two different genres, but each has something to offer.
-Penguin
Sorry to burst your bubble, but Dropshotting takes no skill, I have had games with over 64 kills and less then 4 deaths. I also had a 4-1 K/D Ratio on CODMW2 before I went and sold it. I was actually VERY good at COD. My point is its TO easy.
-BigBOBCH
-
At first I was only going to get Battlefield 3, but after I saw Modern Warfare 3's trailer I think I'll get both. I'm looking forward to see what it's like.
-
At first I was only going to get Battlefield 3, but after I saw Modern Warfare 3's trailer I think I'll get both. I'm looking forward to see what it's like.
NOOO TRAITOR! BF3 will destroy COD ;)
The graphics, sound effects, it almost sounds real.
-BigBOBCH
-
Sorry to burst your bubble, but Dropshotting takes no skill, I have had games with over 64 kills and less then 4 deaths. I also had a 4-1 K/D Ratio on CODMW2 before I went and sold it. I was actually VERY good at COD. My point is its TO easy.
-BigBOBCH
Maybe so but you have to realize other people may like that style of gameplay, i have the first 2 MW games but on PC and yes i agree its a run,gun and nade fest people doing things that's impossible to do, but again some like that and that's why they play them, i shelved mine once the Battlefield series came around because i liked it 10 times over more structure, better squad aspect and the maps are just Better i still play BC2 but BC3 i think is going to set the standards in improved graphics
-
better squad aspect
That is another huge thing. In COD any one person can win the game for your team. In BF you HAVE TO work as a team.
-BigBOBCH
-
Not all of it. It's simply not true.
Grab your copy of CoD, go on YouTube, and look up 360 noscope. Now get in a match, and try to replicate the feat. Not so easy, huh?
Try to get at least three kills every single time you die, without fail. Not so easy, huh?
Try to get a kill with a grenade across the map. Not so easy, huh?
The point is that CoD is a broader game than it appears. It's controls are intuitive and simple to use, and it seems like any idiot can pull off anything. This is simply not the case. Try doing tricks, try putting limitations on yourself, try setting achieve a supremely high goal. There are plenty of was to play CoD, and trust me, we may never see them all.
I like both BF, CoD, and heck, even HALO is fun once in a while. It's the reason why I can enjoy PacMan after a game of chess. Each is special and amazing (not to mention frustrating) in their own ways. I prefer battlefield, but having more people to play with on CoD is also fun.
In conclusion, you can never compare one game to another without running into their paradgims (the things you accept as part of the game without question). They are from almost two different genres, but each has something to offer.
-Penguin
ive done half the stuff youve named. (including killing 2 people in FFA with a simple smoke grenade on nuketown).
now, try to go do ALL that, on battlefield.
if you play battlefield like you would cod, you'd become nothing more but easy kills.
-
That's why I don't play Battlefield that way. Like I've said before, they are two different games and demand two different playstyles.
-Penguin
-
BF3.
I have a feeling BF3 will go over like Medal of Honor did, all hype. I've bought every BF game in the series and 1942 was the only good one, I sold everything else. What I learned though was anything with DICE or EA (especially EA) on the cover, will be bad.
The CoD series has entertained me ever since the beginning. Really wish they'd go back to the old style, but I like where they are going with it now. :aok
-
I just love the rush of FPSs like COD and BF mostly COD. This is because you can clear room by room using tactics and stuff. That is if guys don't run and gun spraying everything with cross map tomahawks. Plus the ocasional camper with a claymore in front of him. I honestly don't see how you could hate COD, I mean you gotta like one of them.
-
Nuff Said http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coiTJbr9m04 (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coiTJbr9m04)
Info on Multiplayerhttp://kotaku.com/5801353/ (http://kotaku.com/5801353/)
(http://mmgn.com/Lib/Images/Blogs/Normal/Modern-Warfare-3-Development-Blog-19-05-2011-1069469.jpg)
(http://www.modernwarfare3xbox360.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/official_modern_warfare_3_trailer-300x201.jpg)
no
BF3.
and no.
both games a pointless and a waste. id rather have the next fallout game in a year.
-
noand no.
both games a pointless and a waste. id rather have the next fallout game in a year.
Then why post here?
Look at me, look at me!
-
noand no.
both games a pointless and a waste. id rather have the next fallout game in a year.
you cant compare fallout with cod&battlefield, there 2 VERY different genres of gaming. so no, im a fallout fan but i'd strongly disagree with both games being pointless. especially seeing how fallout:new vegas got its gun roster idea's from black ops.
-
Then why post here?
Look at me, look at me!
Joe you need to shut your mouth, your negative influence isn't needed on the BBS board.
-
Then why post here?
Look at me, look at me!
everyone is entitled to an opinion, even if it doesnt agree with the subject at hand.
-
everyone is entitled to an opinion, even if it doesnt agree with the subject at hand.
He's trying to make Skorpion look bad cause of one of his others posts, what happens in one thread, should stay in that thread. And he's just being flat out mean in my opinion.
-
I have a feeling BF3 will go over like Medal of Honor did
Idk about that, MoH was rushed out the door. BF3 is going to be similar to BFBC2 in the aspect of the game. They are taking their time on BF3.
-BigBOBCH
-
Idk about that, MoH was rushed out the door. BF3 is going to be similar to BFBC2 in the aspect of the game. They are taking their time on BF3.
-BigBOBCH
plus BF3 is being developed with twice the team the bad company series were.
-
ive done half the stuff youve named. (including killing 2 people in FFA with a simple smoke grenade on nuketown).
now, try to go do ALL that, on battlefield.
if you play battlefield like you would cod, you'd become nothing more but easy kills.
Got called all kinds of names in BC2 when I would get kills with the 40mm smoke grenades. I have tried COD mp but with it being hacked to hell and back it just wasn't any fun. On top of that the whole PC using matchmaking like a console was absolute trash.
-
Got called all kinds of names in BC2 when I would get kills with the 40mm smoke grenades. I have tried COD mp but with it being hacked to hell and back it just wasn't any fun. On top of that the whole PC using matchmaking like a console was absolute trash.
thats why i stick with the fallout games/homefront. nobody cares what you do on there.
you cant compare fallout with cod&battlefield, there 2 VERY different genres of gaming. so no, im a fallout fan but i'd strongly disagree with both games being pointless. especially seeing how fallout:new vegas got its gun roster idea's from black ops.
also how did NV get its guns from black ops?
i dont see laser pistols/rifles or plasma rifles/lasers. not even a single gauss rifle. only 2 things i saw that might be from a COD gun list were the assault carbine and the marksman rifle.
-
thats why i stick with the fallout games/homefront. nobody cares what you do on there.
also how did NV get its guns from black ops?
i dont see laser pistols/rifles or plasma rifles/lasers. not even a single gauss rifle. only 2 things i saw that might be from a COD gun list were the assault carbine and the marksman rifle.
then your not looking hard enough lol.
i'd name off all the goods but it would be half the list and i cant think of there nicknames on NV.
-
Tyrannis I'll make it easy for you. Here is the list of weapons in NV.
http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Fallout:_New_Vegas_weapons
Here are the weapons in Black Ops.
http://www.cod7blackops.com/weapons/
Shouldn't be too hard to name them with the information right in front of you.
-
Tyrannis I'll make it easy for you. Here is the list of weapons in NV.
http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Fallout:_New_Vegas_weapons
Here are the weapons in Black Ops.
http://www.cod7blackops.com/weapons/
Shouldn't be too hard to name them with the information right in front of you.
or i can just tell skorpion to look at those 2 lists and its pretty easy to see which weapons were put in both games (unless youve not played black ops)
im waiting for pss to come back up so i can by dead money.
-
Tyrannis, your the one who claims that nearly half of the Black Ops weapons appear in NV. Back up your claim and name them.
-
Joe you need to shut your mouth, your negative influence isn't needed on the BBS board.
So is this not negative influence? jeezus
Also this is the only good trailer I have found for MW3 and I hate the idea of the game.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VGt5Onx0_I (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VGt5Onx0_I)
-
Tyrannis, your the one who claims that nearly half of the Black Ops weapons appear in NV. Back up your claim and name them.
whats with you ankle humping me all a sudden? who are you? :headscratch:
like i said, look at the list, and you can pretty much see the similarities.
-
whats with you ankle humping me all a sudden? who are you? :headscratch:
like i said, look at the list, and you can pretty much see the similarities.
:lol :rofl
he wasnt ankle humping, hes asking where you found out that 90% of the guns are in NV because of black ops?
or i can just tell skorpion to look at those 2 lists and its pretty easy to see which weapons were put in both games (unless youve not played black ops)
im waiting for pss to come back up so i can by dead money.
and why is it so hard for you to look at it? you can read, right?
i know that only a few guns are in NV that are kind of like black ops. but how did they copy some of the guns in NV from black ops when they both came out near the same date?
:headscratch:
-
Tyrannis, I've looked at both lists and see very few similarities.
To answer your question, I am 40 year old virgin living in my parents basement. The world outside scares me.
Skorpion...to be fair he said about half not 90%.
-
Tyrannis, I've looked at both lists and see very few similarities.
To answer your question, I am 40 year old virgin living in my parents basement. The world outside scares me.
Skorpion...to be fair he said about half not 90%.
Is that tongue in cheek? :confused:
-Penguin
-
:lol :rofl
he wasnt ankle humping, hes asking where you found out that 90% of the guns are in NV because of black ops?
and why is it so hard for you to look at it? you can read, right?
i know that only a few guns are in NV that are kind of like black ops. but how did they copy some of the guns in NV from black ops when they both came out near the same date?
:headscratch:
1. work on your math. 90% is not a half.
2.the list of firearms to appear in black ops came out ALOT sooner than both games came out (before NV even had a release date)
3. cant YOU read? why do i need to point out the obvious for YOU?
4. arent you a little young to be playing an M rated game anyways? :headscratch:
-
I've played both, and let me tell you, the similarities are negligible. The Service Rifle is an old M-16 prototype, and the Assault Rifle is based upon the FAL, and has been there since Fallout 2. The Chinese Assault Rifle is based upon the AK-series, and if we're going to split hairs over copying other games' guns, then both copied it from Counter Strike (if not an earlier game).
All the melee weapons in New Vegas are either completely unique or in the case of the combat knife, ubiquitous. The minigun is older than CoD, and the rest of the Big Guns are unique. The Marksman Carbine is also ubiquitous, it is a development of the M4 series.
The weapons are completely different, and the similarities exist only exist in weapons that go back to DOOM or Counter Strike. You won't find any nuclear bomb catapaults in Black Ops, and the FAMAS is certainly not included in the Fallout timeline.
-Penguin
-
thats why i stick with the fallout games/homefront. nobody cares what you do on there.
You misunderstand me. Getting called names because you impact killed someone swelled my epeen. At the time it wasn't used very much.
-
1. work on your math. 90% is not a half.
2.the list of firearms to appear in black ops came out ALOT sooner than both games came out (before NV even had a release date)
3. cant YOU read? why do i need to point out the obvious for YOU?
4. arent you a little young to be playing an M rated game anyways? :headscratch:
ok, ill say this one time, and one time only. Its a free country, i can do what i want with my xbox and video games. those are reccomendations.
i was using 90% because my keyboard is messed up, my sister spilled syrup all over the keyboard and now numbers one thru eight are broken.
and finally, it doesnt matter if a list of weapons for black ops came out before new vegas, they had alot of guns developed when it came out already, probably one of the first things done. and i read it, why cant you?
until my mother dies and you adopt me (id rather commit suicide) then you can tell me what to do with my video games.
-
I've played both, and let me tell you, the similarities are negligible. The Service Rifle is an old M-16 prototype, and the Assault Rifle is based upon the FAL, and has been there since Fallout 2. The Chinese Assault Rifle is based upon the AK-series, and if we're going to split hairs over copying other games' guns, then both copied it from Counter Strike (if not an earlier game).
All the melee weapons in New Vegas are either completely unique or in the case of the combat knife, ubiquitous. The minigun is older than CoD, and the rest of the Big Guns are unique. The Marksman Carbine is also ubiquitous, it is a development of the M4 series.
The weapons are completely different, and the similarities exist only exist in weapons that go back to DOOM or Counter Strike. You won't find any nuclear bomb catapaults in Black Ops, and the FAMAS is certainly not included in the Fallout timeline.
-Penguin
uh, if your talking about the assault rifle in FO3, thats not a FAL, thats G3. the autocarbine in NV is an ar-15(which is the commando in blops).
ok, ill say this one time, and one time only. Its a free country, i can do what i want with my xbox and video games. those are reccomendations.
i was using 90% because my keyboard is messed up, my sister spilled syrup all over the keyboard and now numbers one thru eight are broken.
and finally, it doesnt matter if a list of weapons for black ops came out before new vegas, they had alot of guns developed when it came out already, probably one of the first things done. and i read it, why cant you?
until my mother dies and you adopt me (id rather commit suicide) then you can tell me what to do with my video games.
LOL, no actually, you cant. theres a ratings system for a reason little one. if your were maybe 16, then sure letting you play M rated games would be sorta ok, but at 14? nah.
uh, child there are 2 ways to enter numbers on a keyboard 1. the number pad. and 2. the numbers lining the top of the letters. and you also have a virtual keyboard in your options menu. learn to lie better :rolleyes:
adopt you? :huh
-
Tyrannis, I took your advice and I read thought both lists. Since Black Ops doesn't have energy weapons, power fists, pool cues, or golf clubs, I skipped those sections in the NV guide. Here is what I found:
China Lake = Grenade Launcher
M60 = Light Machine Gun
M16 = Service Rifle
Commando = Assault Carbine
M1911 = .45 Auto Pistol
Python = .44 Magnum Revolver
Frag Grenade = Frag Grenade
C4 = C4
Eight total matches. By my count Black Ops has a total of 54 weapons. 14.8% of the weapons match.
If you your totally honest, all of the weapons listed have appeared in other games prior to Black Ops. With that in mind one could claim Black Ops ripped of many of the FPS that came before it.
-
If you guys don't like Call of Duty games or BF. Your obviously not real gamers. In which case your comment and opinion doesn't count for nothing besides the people saying TV roughts your brains. Unless you played the old DOOM.
AT THE LEAST, you gotta like Homefront, WOW, Minecraft, Net-DS games, SOCOM.
The funny thing is thousands if not millions of videos have been made of COD or some other FPS.
Plus at the very LEAST the last paper thick floor, before you hit lava. You gotta like Poker Games. I hope all of you who have played a video game at least like ONE of these games.
-
Tyrannis, I took your advice and I read thought both lists. Since Black Ops doesn't have energy weapons, power fists, pool cues, or golf clubs, I skipped those sections in the NV guide. Here is what I found:
China Lake = Grenade Launcher
M60 = Light Machine Gun
M16 = Service Rifle
Commando = Assault Carbine
M1911 = .45 Auto Pistol
Python = .44 Magnum Revolver
Frag Grenade = Frag Grenade
C4 = C4
Eight total matches. By my count Black Ops has a total of 54 weapons. 14.8% of the weapons match.
If you your totally honest, all of the weapons listed have appeared in other games prior to Black Ops. With that in mind one could claim Black Ops ripped of many of the FPS that came before it.
there are also 2 guns, that look nothing alike, but have the (almost) same name-CZ57 and the CZ75 avenger (NV)
-
there are also 2 guns, that look nothing alike, but have the same name-CZ57 and the CZ75 avenger (NV)
not the same name check your spelling noob.