Aces High Bulletin Board
General Forums => Aircraft and Vehicles => Topic started by: nrshida on February 24, 2012, 01:35:55 PM
-
I've been encouraged by a friend to give the K-4 a little try and I have a few minor questions which I'm too lazy to research myself, so I thought I'd just ask here instead :lol
Firstly, how come the G-14 has bulges in the cowl for the heavy machine guns, but the K-4 does not, even though it apparently has the same machine guns.
Secondly is the power and torque significantly more than than the G-14 or is the airframe lighter, or the airscrew different or does it have more revs on WEP because it seems much easier to get stuck trying to manoeuvre against the torque.
Thirdly is the K-4 more stable as it seems to feel so and is this because of increased weight in the nose?
Finally why is there a missing instrument on the left of the panel and what was it. Or in other words, who stole the clock radio from my dashboard and where can I file my insurance claim. It was a Rolex you know* :old:
*Rock on Ron White :rock
-
The K-4 has bulges, just better streamlined.
Yes the engine in the K-4 is more powerful than in the G-14.
-
Finally why is there a missing instrument on the left of the panel and what was it. Or in other words, who stole the clock radio from my dashboard and where can I file my insurance claim. It was a Rolex you know* :old:
Rolex is a terrible time keeper so your better off.
-
The K-4 (and G10s if I recall) had the same feed chutes for the cowling guns, but it simple smoothed out the cowling to cover them more aerodynamically.
It's hard to find a good example, but here's one (the light on the plastic shows the curve of the bulge) that illustrates how it sticks out to each side:
(http://i301.photobucket.com/albums/nn48/MikeTheModeller/Modelblog/DSCF3202b.jpg)
P.S. Below 10K the G14 and K4 are nearly identical. Only above 10k, above 15k, and upward towards 25k do you notice much of a performance gain. Above 10K the 109K-4 gets better and the G-14 gets worse. Below that they trade off advantages and are almost the same, fight-wise.
-
I've been encouraged by a friend to give the K-4 a little try and I have a few minor questions which I'm too lazy to research myself, so I thought I'd just ask here instead :lol
Firstly, how come the G-14 has bulges in the cowl for the heavy machine guns, but the K-4 does not, even though it apparently has the same machine guns.
The airframe was streamlined between the G and the K models. The k4 has a retractable tail wheel too.
Secondly is the power and torque significantly more than than the G-14 or is the airframe lighter, or the airscrew different or does it have more revs on WEP because it seems much easier to get stuck trying to manoeuvre against the torque.
The K4 has a DB605D while the G-14 has a DB605AS. The G14 actually has better low alt climb and low speed acceleration.
Thirdly is the K-4 more stable as it seems to feel so and is this because of increased weight in the nose?
The K-4 is better balanced, but a well flown G-14 can do some amazing stall tricks due to the instability.
Finally why is there a missing instrument on the left of the panel and what was it. Or in other words, who stole the clock radio from my dashboard and where can I file my insurance claim. It was a Rolex you know* :old:
Its not a clock, its the prop pitch indicator. I don't think it works properly in AH, but in RL, all the 109s had a manual pitch override.
-
Wow, thanks for all the information. :salute I also didn't know that about Rolex, I've only got an old Casio and the battery ran out 18 years ago :lol
If the performance figures are similar at the lower altitudes how come the K-4 is so much more popular in the MA?
-
If the performance figures are similar at the lower altitudes how come the K-4 is so much more popular in the MA?
Two reasons...
1) The K4 can catch most runners. This is more important in a 109 than other rides because of its 30mm cannon. For most, one must be in very short range to make a shot, so often other players run once the adv is lost, and unlike 50cals which can make hits from 600+ out, unless you are grizz, you prob wont be able too.
2) The K4/G14 goes in fads, I remember several years back when I flew the G14 almost exclusively, towards the end of my G14 tenure, many more G14 pilots started showing up, including a G14 squad. That blip faded and the K4 became popular. As self serving as it sounds, I think it has some to do with the number of top sticks fly'n it and being successful in it.
-
It's been around longer. It's about 10mph faster. If you're diving it's slightly more streamlined. Depending on the altitude, it may be slightly faster than the G14... So you can chase those bombers up to 30K and then still chase a fighter down to the deck.
I think reputation, mostly...
Looking here:
(http://www.hitechcreations.com/components/com_ahplaneperf/genchart.php?p1=84&p2=1&pw=2>ype=0&gui=localhost&itemsel=GameData)
(http://www.hitechcreations.com/components/com_ahplaneperf/genchart.php?p1=84&p2=1&pw=2>ype=2&gui=localhost&itemsel=GameData)
You can see they aren't too much off, until you get up in altitude. As mentioned, some folks say there is a balance/feel difference between the two... I don't know if I agree with that. I think they are very close. G-14 turns ever so slightly tighter with and without flaps. Overall I don't see much reason to take a K-4 other than personal preference, or if you're going up above 15k. Outside of that, the G-14 has WGRs, gunpods, 20mm hub, etc. It's got almost all you need.
-
Yes, the G14 will out turn the K4 with and without flaps. This is because the g14 weighs less.
-
The K4 has a DB605D while the G-14 has a DB605AS.
Only the G-14/AS used the that engine.
2/3rds of G-14 new production used the DB605A engine (2689 vs 1377)
-
The K4 has some instabilities too much like the G14... learn to use them to your advantage. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCVK3nhkOAg&feature=channel_video_title&noredirect=1
Krusty, there's definitely a different feel between all of the 109s, very little, but you can tell.
-
The K4 has some instabilities too much like the G14... learn to use them to your advantage. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCVK3nhkOAg&feature=channel_video_title&noredirect=1
Krusty, there's definitely a different feel between all of the 109s, very little, but you can tell.
Cool vid, and nice shooting! Wish had tricks like that! :joystick:
-
Ardy what do you mean by "manual prop pitch override" or "prop pitch indicator"
-
Ardy what do you mean by "manual prop pitch override" or "prop pitch indicator"
I forgot the exact term, the 109 the pilot could either set the desired RPM and have the prop governor adjust the prop pitch, or the pilot could override the governor and manually adjust the prop pitch.
EDIT: It looks like I'm wrong about that exact gauge. The gauge that Shida is referring too is the MW pressure gauge. Dial #47 is the prop-pitch indicator.
"34 Pessure Gauge for MW Installation"
(http://www.airpages.ru/eng/img/abb1.gif)
1 Horizontal Stab. Trim; 2 Flap Handwheel; 3 Cabin Vents; 4 Fuel Selector Handle; 5 Tail Wheel Lock; 6 Glove Heater Plug; 7 Stabilizer Trim Indicator; 8 Engine Primer Hand Pump; 9 Bomb or Drop Tank jettison; 10 Prop Pitch Auto/Man. Switch; 11 Man. Coolant Valve Controls *; 12 Momentary Limit Switch; 13 Quick-Stop Handle; 14 Fuel Selector & Cutoff; 15 Winter Start Handle; 16 Throttle with Thumb Switch for Prop Pitch Control; 17 Motor Generator for Artificial Horizon; 18 UV Cabin Lights; 19 Canopy jettison Handle; 20 Starter Handle; 21 Landing Gear Push Buttons; 22 Selector Switch for 21 cm Rockets or MK 108 **; 23 Landing Gear Indicators; 24 Magneto Switch; 25 Switch for MW Installation; 26 Jettison Switch for 21 cm Rocket Tubes **; 27 Windscreen Cleaning Valve; 28 Main Elect. Circuit Breaker; 29 Master Weapon Switch; 30 Ammunition Counters & Indicators; 31 Armor Glass Windscreen; 32 Gun Sight Revi 16B; 33 Gun Sight Mount; 34 Pessure Gauge for MW Installation; 35 Airspeed Indicator; 36 Artificial Horizon; 37 Vertical Speed Indicator; 38 Altimeter; 39 Repeater Compass; 40 AFN2 Instrument Flight Indicator; 41 Instrument Flight Panel; 42 Fuel & Oil Pressure Gauge; 43 Coolant Temperature Gauge; 44 Tachometer; 45 Flare Gun Port; 46 Oil Temperature Gauge; 47 Prop Pitch Indicator; 48 Manifold Pressure Gauge; 49 Emergency Land. Gear Release; 50 Low Fuel Warning Light; 51 ZSK 244A Bomb Arming Panel; 52 Cover for MK 108; 53 Control Column Grip; 54 Charging Button For MK 108; 55 B2 Button for Bomb Release; 56 Bl Button for MK 108 or Rockets; 57 A Button for MG 131; 58 Radiator Flap Control ; 59 Fuel jettison Handle; 60 Circuit Breaker Panel; 61 Compass Deviation Card; 62 Oxygen Monitor; 63 Oxygen Pressure Gauge; 64 Drop Tank Fuel Transfer Sight Glass; 65 Oxygen Regulator; 66 Main Valve for Oxygen System; 67 Control for FuG 16ZY Radio; 68 Frequency Selector for FuG 16ZY Radio; 69 Headphone Volume Control; 70 Control for FuG 25a (IFF) Radio; 71 Headphone Jack; 72 Oxygen Mask Hose.
* only on initial AC
** omitted in later A/C
-
Oh ok, very cool!
-
Wow, thanks for all the information. :salute I also didn't know that about Rolex, I've only got an old Casio and the battery ran out 18 years ago :lol
If the performance figures are similar at the lower altitudes how come the K-4 is so much more popular in the MA?
As has been said, it's high-speed acceleration is astonishing (great for those runstangs), and it is slightly more stable I think in a lightly-laden knife fight (or rather, maybe it's just easier to not over-laden like a G-14)... then again K < G < F < E too, why choose the second from the top-line?
-
I find the K4 to personally be a bit easier to handle then the G14. I'm no K4 expert, like some here, but I tend to do better then average in it. I think it in part has to do with the G14's WEP. The WEP on a G14 is a huge boost over it's military power, while it's less extreme on the K4. Either plane you have to be extremely carefull with WEP at low speeds and high angles. All 109's fly similiar, but they each have their own personalities and fans.
:salute
BigRat
-
I find the K4 to personally be a bit easier to handle then the G14. I'm no K4 expert, like some here, but I tend to do better then average in it. I think it in part has to do with the G14's WEP. The WEP on a G14 is a huge boost over it's military power, while it's less extreme on the K4. Either plane you have to be extremely carefull with WEP at low speeds and high angles. All 109's fly similiar, but they each have their own personalities and fans.
:salute
BigRat
-
why choose the second from the top-line?
Well the handling mainly. I did one month in the G-14 in the MA and I can feel a big difference between the G-14 and the K-4.
Ah it's quite a bit faster, I didn't realise. The extra speed and good altitude performance probably explains the popularity.
The missing gauge is immediately to the right of number 35 (Airspeed Indicator) and it's not labelled on Ardy's diagram either.
Great stuff, thanks for the information guys.
-
The K4 has a DB605D while the G-14 has a DB605AS.
In AH G-14 has DB605AM, not AS. This is easily seen by looking at the shape of the cowl.
-
:aok
-
In AH G-14 has DB605AM, not AS. This is easily seen by looking at the shape of the cowl.
Only to the trained eye! :old:
-
Only the G-14/AS used the that engine.
2/3rds of G-14 new production used the DB605A engine (2689 vs 1377)
In AH G-14 has DB605AM, not AS. This is easily seen by looking at the shape of the cowl.
So the G14 AH is DB605AM or DB605A (is there a difference)?
-
So the G14 AH is DB605AM or DB605A (is there a difference)?
The DB605AM used MW50. The DB605A did not.
The S engine used the larger supercharger from the DB603 engine.
-
(http://i1114.photobucket.com/albums/k526/rwrk2/G-14--K-4-Bulges.gif)
Do you see why I asked about the apparently absent machine gun bulges? :headscratch:
-
The DB605AM used MW50. The DB605A did not.
The S engine used the larger supercharger from the DB603 engine.
oh cool, thanks.
-
Ironically the missing gauge is a clock it seems:-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jq3eMzrTmxo
Rolex, for sure. Write the cheque, premium boy!
-
G14 is to slow. When I fly it I always have the feeling that, that runner got away because I wasn't in a k4, or I roped
Myself up because I didn't have the climb rate of k4.
-
The truth is you like flat chested women JOACH1M (see gif above)! :banana: :old:
I also got the feeling winging with you yesterday that the K-4 had a lot more steam in the vert, I guess it's a combination of better streamlining and more power.
-
The truth is you like flat chested women JOACH1M (see gif above)! :banana: :old:
I also got the feeling winging with you yesterday that the K-4 had a lot more steam in the vert, I guess it's a combination of better streamlining and more power.
I'm kind of a butt guy myself :old: :banana:
The k4 just feels alot more powerful, but there is a difference in handling from what I can tell when flying it. The handling difference isnt much to make me want to fly the g14 over the k4.
-
Thanks for the input Jo. I'll have a careful think about it all including the merits of a sound butt :salute
-
For fights under 10K, and against most opponents the G14 is my ride of choice. If it's above 10k/and or I'm fighting nothing but Ponys and La7s, the K4 is my ride.
The G14 just seems to dance a little better. Don't get me wrong, the K4 can dance too, but I just prefer the G14 at lower altitudes for some reason.
Just fly them both for a while, get the feel of each, what they like, what they don't like, what you find more to your style, etc etc. They are both fun fun, and to a joy when that 30mm lands! :devil
-
EZ mode heroes :P
-
The G6 is easier :)
-
(http://i570.photobucket.com/albums/ss147/tnelson3_bucket/220px-Nothitler.jpg)
-
Well the handling mainly. I did one month in the G-14 in the MA and I can feel a big difference between the G-14 and the K-4.
Ah it's quite a bit faster, I didn't realise. The extra speed and good altitude performance probably explains the popularity.
The missing gauge is immediately to the right of number 35 (Airspeed Indicator) and it's not labelled on Ardy's diagram either.
Great stuff, thanks for the information guys.
Sarcasm is horrible over the internets: I refering to why the K-4 is so much more popular in the MAs than the G-14, most just skip the whole series and go straight to the top of the line. The G-14 is actually a very good plane.
-
Sarcasm is horrible over the internets: I refering to why the K-4 is so much more popular in the MAs than the G-14, most just skip the whole series and go straight to the top of the line. The G-14 is actually a very good plane.
Oh yes sarcasm :lol Here, help yourself to my stir pot gif, that would've made the point:-
(http://i1114.photobucket.com/albums/k526/rwrk2/stirpot.gif)
-
maybe for some its a 'bigger the number is better' but for me, the K4 is hands down preferable because its more stable in the stall, it accelerates a lot faster, and overall feels a lot more comfortable. I suppose if you really push the G14 at the lower speed bands (under 200) with expert flap work and little or no desire for a quick extension - then it will get a better cross shot. But if you intend to keep it fast, and really want to push the vert, then the K4 just hangs for a bit longer.
my 2 p
-
maybe for some its a 'bigger the number is better' but for me, the K4 is hands down preferable because its more stable in the stall, it accelerates a lot faster, and overall feels a lot more comfortable. I suppose if you really push the G14 at the lower speed bands (under 200) with expert flap work and little or no desire for a quick extension - then it will get a better cross shot. But if you intend to keep it fast, and really want to push the vert, then the K4 just hangs for a bit longer.
my 2 p
In terms of acceleration, the K-4 accelerates just 3% faster than the G-14. That's truly insignificant. Steady climb rate? Virtually identical to 15,000 feet. The G-14 out-turns the K-4 clean, and more easily with flaps. It boils down to speed and better vision forward. That's where the K-4 beats the G-14. That speed can translate into better zoom climb, as well as egressing from a bad situation...